The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving effects of the mushroom Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus) on mild cognitive impairment: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial
Abstract
A double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled trial was performed on 50‐ to 80‐year‐old Japanese men and women diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment in order to examine the efficacy of oral administration of Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus), an edible mushroom, for improving cognitive impairment, using a cognitive function scale based on the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS‐R). After 2 weeks of preliminary examination, 30 subjects were randomized into two 15‐person groups, one of which was given Yamabushitake and the other given a placebo. The subjects of the Yamabushitake group took four 250 mg tablets containing 96% of Yamabushitake dry powder three times a day for 16 weeks. After termination of the intake, the subjects were observed for the next 4 weeks. At weeks 8, 12 and 16 of the trial, the Yamabushitake group showed significantly increased scores on the cognitive function scale compared with the placebo group. The Yamabushitake group's scores increased with the duration of intake, but at week 4 after the termination of the 16 weeks intake, the scores decreased significantly. Laboratory tests showed no adverse effect of Yamabushitake. The results obtained in this study suggest that Yamabushitake is effective in improving mild cognitive impairment. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hashimoto, M., Tanabe, Y., Fujii, Y., Kikuta, T., Shibata, H., & Shido, O. (2005) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/135.3.549 · Cited by 288
Cited by
Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: edible, medicinal and poisonous species
Wu, F., Zhou, L.-W., Yang, Z.-L., Bau, T., Li, T.-H., & Dai, Y.-C. (2019) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-019-00432-7 · Cited by 394
The biology of ergothioneine, an antioxidant nutraceutical
Borodina, I., Kenny, L. C., McCarthy, C. M., Paramasivan, K., Pretorius, E., Roberts, T. J., van der Hoek, S. A., & Kell, D. B. (2020) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422419000301 · Cited by 296
“The kinds of evidence include both doubleblind, placebo-controlled clinical trials(341) and observational Erg”
BackgroundErgothioneine, an adaptive antioxidant for the protection of injured tissues? A hypothesis
Halliwell, B., Cheah, I. K., & Drum, C. L. (2016) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.124 · Cited by 123
Feng, L., Cheah, I. K.-M., Ng, M. M.-X., Li, J., Chan, S. M., Lim, S. L., Mahendran, R., Kua, E.-H., & Halliwell, B. (2019) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-180959 · Cited by 112
D’Cunha, N. M., Georgousopoulou, E. N., Dadigamuwage, L., Kellett, J., Panagiotakos, D. B., Thomas, J., McKune, A. J., Mellor, D. D., & Naumovski, N. (2018) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114517003452 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Mori, K., Inatomi, S., Ouchi, K., Azumi, Y., & Tuchida, T.
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-372
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1573
- OpenAlex
- W1987686962
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving effects of the mushroom Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus) on mild cognitive impairment: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ptr.2634
- The paper
- Mori, K., Inatomi, S., Ouchi, K., Azumi, Y., & Tuchida, T. (2009). Improving effects of the mushroom Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus) on mild cognitive impairment: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Phytotherapy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.