The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized, Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Open accessAbstract
Curcumin is known to possess potent antiinflammatory and antiarthritic properties. This pilot clinical study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of curcumin alone, and in combination with diclofenac sodium in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Forty‐five patients diagnosed with RA were randomized into three groups with patients receiving curcumin (500 mg) and diclofenac sodium (50 mg) alone or their combination. The primary endpoints were reduction in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28. The secondary endpoints included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for reduction in tenderness and swelling of joint scores. Patients in all three treatment groups showed statistically significant changes in their DAS scores. Interestingly, the curcumin group showed the highest percentage of improvement in overall DAS and ACR scores (ACR 20, 50 and 70) and these scores were significantly better than the patients in the diclofenac sodium group. More importantly, curcumin treatment was found to be safe and did not relate with any adverse events. Our study provides the first evidence for the safety and superiority of curcumin treatment in patients with active RA, and highlights the need for future large‐scale trials to validate these findings in patients with RA and other arthritic conditions. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Curcumin: A Review of Its Effects on Human Health
Hewlings, S., & Kalman, D. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100092 · Cited by 2,720
Molecular pharmacology of inflammation: Medicinal plants as anti-inflammatory agents
Tasneem, S., Liu, B., Li, B., Choudhary, M. I., & Wang, W. (2019) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.001 · Cited by 358
Curcuminoid Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial
Panahi, Y., Rahimnia, A., Sharafi, M., Alishiri, G., Saburi, A., & Sahebkar, A. (2014) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.5174 · Cited by 310
Curcumin and colorectal cancer: An update and current perspective on this natural medicine
Weng, W., & Goel, A. (2022) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.02.011 · Cited by 287
Self-citationHaroyan, A., Mukuchyan, V., Mkrtchyan, N., Minasyan, N., Gasparyan, S., Sargsyan, A., Narimanyan, M., & Hovhannisyan, A. (2018) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12906-017-2062-z · Cited by 232
Chen, L.-L., Fan, Y.-G., Zhao, L.-X., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2023) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.106301 · Cited by 200
Sahebkar, A., Mohammadi, A., Atabati, A., Rahiman, S., Tavallaie, S., Iranshahi, M., Akhlaghi, S., Ferns, G. A., & Ghayour‐Mobarhan, M. (2013) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.4952 · Cited by 183
Curcumin: an effective adjunct in patients with statin-associated muscle symptoms?
Sahebkar, A., Saboni, N., Pirro, M., & Banach, M. (2017) · Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12140 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandran, B., & Goel, A.
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1719-1725
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1573
- OpenAlex
- W1560004065
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.