Cited by 77Phytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionPharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants

A systematic review of the clinical use of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) to ameliorate cognitive dysfunction

Ng, Qin Xiang, Loke, Wayren, Foo, Nadine Xinhui, Tan, Weng Jun, Chan, Hwei Wuen, Lim, Donovan Yutong, Yeo, Wee Song·2020·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

Many developed countries are experiencing a rapidly "greying" population, and cognitive decline is common in the elderly. There is no cure for dementia, and pharmacotherapy options to treat cognitive dysfunction provide limited symptomatic improvements. Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha), a popular herb highly valued in Ayurvedic medicine, has often been used to aid memory and cognition. This systematic review thus aimed to evaluate the clinical evidence base and investigate the potential role of W. somnifera in managing cognitive dysfunction. Using the following keywords [withania somnifera OR indian ginseng OR Ashwagandha OR winter cherry] AND [brain OR cognit* OR mental OR dementia OR memory], a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Clinicaltrials.gov databases found five clinical studies that met the study's eligibility criteria. Overall, there is some early clinical evidence, in the form of randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials, to support the cognitive benefits of W. somnifera supplementation. However, a rather heterogeneous study population was sampled, including older adults with mild cognitive impairment and adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. In most instances, W. somnifera extract improved performance on cognitive tasks, executive function, attention, and reaction time. It also appears to be well tolerated, with good adherence and minimal side effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.6552

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, Q. X., Loke, W., Foo, N. X., Tan, W. J., Chan, H. W., Lim, D. Y., & Yeo, W. S.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Mental Health (SG)
  • MOH Holdings (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Ng, Qin Xiang
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-19
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
583-590
ISSN
  • 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1573
OpenAlex
W2990575641
Cited by
77
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants
Keywords
Withania somnifera, cognitive impairment, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, Ayurveda, herbal supplementation, memory, executive function, attention, older adults, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, tolerability
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Dementia, Humans, Medicine, Ayurvedic, Memory, Plant Extracts, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Withania, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review