Cited by 2,237Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge

Open access
Thrun, Sebastian, Montemerlo, Mike, Dahlkamp, Hendrik, Stavens, David, Aron, Andrei, Diebel, James, Fong, Philip, Gale, John +22 more·2006·Journal of Field Robotics

Abstract

This article describes the robot Stanley, which won the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge. Stanley was developed for high‐speed desert driving without manual intervention. The robot's software system relied predominately on state‐of‐the‐art artificial intelligence technologies, such as machine learning and probabilistic reasoning. This paper describes the major components of this architecture, and discusses the results of the Grand Challenge race. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rob.20147

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3D-LiDAR has only been used in automobiles for slightly over ten years, but it has already been shown to be crucial to development of AVs and ADS.

    “Even though 3D-LiDAR has only been used in automobiles for slightly over ten years, it has already been shown to be crucial to the development of AVs and ADS [36].”

    From Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles under Adverse Weather: A Review of Traditional and Deep Learning Approaches (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

    Section 5.1, Terrain Labeling (page unavailable), says Stanley used roof-mounted laser scanners to generate 3D point clouds and relied on them for short- and medium-range obstacle avoidance. This supports an important role for laser sensing in one autonomous vehicle, but the paper does not establish when 3D-LiDAR first entered automobile use or that it is crucial to AV and ADS development generally. It describes five single-scan range finders, not a dedicated 3D-LiDAR unit. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]10. Farrell, J., & Barth, M. ͑1999͒. The global positioning sys- tem. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  2. [11]11. Gat, E. ͑1998͒. Three-layered architectures. In D. Korten- kamp, R. Bonasso, & R. Murphy ͑Eds.͒, AI-based mo- bile robots: Case studies of successful robot systems ͑pp. 195-210͒. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. [21]21. In J.H. Connell & S. Mahadevan ͑Eds.͒, Robot learning ͑pp. 19-43͒. New York: Kluwer Academic.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Dahlkamp, H., Stavens, D., Aron, A., Diebel, J., Fong, P., Gale, J., Halpenny, M., Hoffmann, G., Lau, K., Oakley, C., Palatucci, M., Pratt, V., Stang, P., Strohband, S., Dupont, C., Jendrossek, L., Koelen, C., Markey, C., Rummel, C., van Niekerk, J., Jensen, E., Alessandrini, P., Bradski, G., Davies, B., Ettinger, S., Kaehler, A., Nefian, A., & Mahoney, P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Field Robotics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
661-692
ISSN
  • 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4967
OpenAlex
W2154844948
Cited by
2,237
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 168 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 126 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 79
FWCI
207.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Field Robotics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
DARPA Grand Challenge, autonomous driving, desert driving, autonomous vehicles, robot software architecture, machine learning, probabilistic reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review