The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Time‐stamped camera data are increasingly used to study temporal patterns in species and community ecology, including species’ activity patterns and niche partitioning. Given the importance of niche partitioning for facilitating coexistence between sympatric species, understanding how emerging environmental stressors – climate and landscape change, biodiversity loss and concomitant changes to community composition – affect temporal niche partitioning is of immediate importance for advancing ecological theory and informing management decisions. A large variety of analytical approaches have been applied to camera‐trap data to ask key questions about species activity patterns and temporal overlap among heterospecifics. Despite the many advances for describing and quantifying these temporal patterns, few studies have explicitly tested how interacting biotic and abiotic variables influence species’ activity and capacity to segregate along the temporal niche axis. To address this gap, we suggest coordinated distributed experiments to capture sufficient camera‐trap data across a range of anthropogenic stressors and community compositions. This will facilitate a standardized approach to assessing the impacts of multiple variables on species’ behaviours and interactions. Ultimately, further integration of spatial and temporal analyses of camera‐trap data is critical for improving our understanding of how anthropogenic activities and landscape changes are altering competitive interactions and the dynamics of animal communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 1×
“Global biodiversity declines are being driven by the direct and indirect effects of anthropogenic disturbances (Cardinale et al. 2012; Hooper et al. 2012).”
BackgroundHutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Schoener, T. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4145.27 · Cited by 4,129 · cited 3×
“Animal activity – quantifying how species distribute their activity over the day – is an important dimension of animal behaviour; how species use time as a resource provides valuable information about their ecological niche (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundInfluentialA global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change
Hooper, D. U., Adair, E. C., Cardinale, B. J., Byrnes, J. E. K., Hungate, B. A., Matulich, K. L., Gonzalez, A., Duffy, J. E., Gamfeldt, L., & O’Connor, M. I. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11118 · Cited by 2,406
Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M., & Watson, J. E. M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/536143a · Cited by 1,979 · cited 1×
“With anthropogenic landscape changes projected to continue globally (Theobald 2005; Seto et al. 2011; Maxwell et al. 2016), focusing research efforts on understanding species spatiotemporal responses to those impacts is vital to sound conservation and management decisions.”
BackgroundMesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures
Karanth, K. U., & Nichols, J. D. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,176
Partitioning of time as an ecological resource
Kronfeld-Schor, N., & Dayan, T. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132435 · Cited by 1,021
de Almeida Jácomo, A. T., Silveira, L., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. (2004) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1017/s0952836903004473 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Singer, D., Kamp, J., Hondong, H., Schuldt, A., & Hagge, J. (2026) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-025-02307-y · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Frey, S., Fisher, J. T., Burton, A. C., & Volpe, J. P.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 123-132
- ISSN
- 2056-3485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2745608939
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rse2.60
- The paper
- Frey, S., Fisher, J. T., Burton, A. C., & Volpe, J. P. (2017). Investigating animal activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning using camera‐trap data: challenges and opportunities. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.