The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy
Open accessAbstract
Reform efforts in science education emphasize the importance of rigorous treatment of science standards and use of innovative pedagogical approaches to make science more meaningful and successful. In this paper, we present a learning‐goals‐driven design model for developing curriculum materials, which combines national standards and a project‐based pedagogical approach. We describe our design model in the context of the Investigating and Questioning our World through Science and Technology (IQWST) project, which is developing a three‐year coordinated series of middle grades science curriculum materials. From using this model in the development and enactment of the curriculum, we identified three important characteristics: unpacking national science standards, developing a learning performances approach to specifying learning goals, and aligning learning goals, instructional activities, and assessments. Using a case study of an IQWST unit from initial development through two cycles of enactment, we describe how these three characteristics help guide curriculum design, identify design issues in curriculum enactments, and guide the development of design solutions. The iterative use of the learning‐goals‐driven design model coupled with the analysis of multiple data sources informed our revision of the curriculum materials, resulting in substantial student learning gains for the targeted science content and scientific inquiry learning goals. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 92:1–32, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594
Self-citationDesign Experiments in Educational Research
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009 · Cited by 3,548
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1204_2 · Cited by 1,061 · cited 4×
“For example, the Learning By Design units (Kolodner et al., 2003), units developed in the Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools (Singer, Marx, Krajcik, & Chambers, 2000), and units designed in response to Israel’s Tomorrow 98 initiative (Tal & Kedmi, 2006) are generally 6–8 weeks in length and modular in d…”
BackgroundInfluentialInquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, R. T. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20039 · Cited by 385
Self-citation
Cited by
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20311 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citation(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,154
The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education
Martin, L. (2015) · Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) · doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1099 · Cited by 775
Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x · Cited by 555
Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-based Approach to Reform
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F., & Rogat, A. (2009) · doi:10.12698/cpre.2009.rr63 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-13
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-32
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2006200146
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 58.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.20240
- The paper
- Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.