Cited by 9Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMedication Adherence and Compliance

Designing a sequentially randomized study with adherence enhancing interventions for diabetes patients

Buyze, Jozefien, Van Rompaye, Bart, Goetghebeur, Els·2010·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Adaptive treatment strategies can change treatment prescription over time in response to intermediate outcomes. They are the natural choice for treating chronic diseases or for prevention, since the condition of subjects tends to change over the long term. Similarly, flexible intervention strategies are vital for generating or sustaining better adherence in long term treatment settings. When a cost‐efficient first‐line treatment is available, for instance, good adherence is expected to help delay or avoid second‐line treatment. Sequentially randomized trials enable unbiased evaluation of how to best adapt adherence supporting interventions to a history of outcomes and adherence with the goal to optimize future treatment response. In this paper we propose and study different sequential designs targeting cost‐efficient control of type II diabetes under first‐line treatment through two different classes of adherence support: by (bio)technical and by behavioural means. We study their respective and joint impact first through double factorial adaptive designs, where interventions are triggered by an elevated risk of current treatment failure predicted by poor surrogate response. We develop the double factorial design and several derived designs that are more cost‐efficient in the context of managed care of diabetes patients. We evaluate the marginal responses over time to different adaptive treatment strategies by means of doubly robust estimators. We consider sample sizes needed to thus detect realistic and worthwhile effects and discuss the relative practical and theoretical merits of the separate designs. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.3856

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buyze, J., Van Rompaye, B., & Goetghebeur, E.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Buyze, Jozefien
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-25
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1114-1126
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2068618257
Cited by
9
References
30
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
adaptive treatment strategies, medication adherence, type 2 diabetes, first-line therapy, second-line therapy, treatment failure prediction, sample size determination, doubly robust estimation
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Models, Statistical, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review