Cited by 113Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Adaptive Treatment Strategies in Chronic Disease

Open access
Lavori, Philip W., Dawson, Ree·2008·Annual Review of Medicine

Abstract

An adaptive treatment strategy (ATS) is a rule for adapting a treatment plan to a patient's history of previous treatments and the response to those treatments. The ongoing management of chronic disease defines an ATS, which may be implicit and hidden or explicit and well-specified. The ATS is characterized by the use of intermediate, early markers of response to dynamically alter treatment decisions, in order to achieve a favorable ultimate outcome. We illustrate the ATS concept and describe how the effect of initial treatment decisions depends on the performance of subsequent decisions at later stages. We show how to compare two or more ATSs, or to determine an optimal ATS, using a sequential multiple assignment randomized (SMAR) trial. Designers of clinical trials might find the ATS concept useful in improving the efficiency and ecological relevance of clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.med.59.062606.122232

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many health disorders are managed through a sequential, individualized approach in which treatment is adapted and readapted over time according to the individual's needs and changing status.

    “The management of many health disorders, such as obesity, substance use, or depression, often entails a sequential, individualized approach whereby treatment (e.g., behavioral or medical interventions, or a combination) is adapted and readapted over time in response to the specific needs and evolving status of the individual [1,2].”
  • Even with slow tapering, the likelihood of withdrawal syndromes and persistent postwithdrawal disorders and symptoms is very high.

    “Even with slow tapering, the likelihood of withdrawal syndromes and persistent postwithdrawal disorders and symptoms is very high”
  • The likelihood of response of withdrawal and postwithdrawal syndromes to new antidepressants is very variable.

    “the likelihood of response of these syndromes to the introduction of new antidepressants is very variable [29-33].”
  • Many STAR*D findings can be interpreted in light of the oppositional model of tolerance: pharmacological manipulations by switching or augmentation may propel depressive illness into a refractory phase with low remission, high relapse, and high intolerance.

    “Many of the STAR * D findings can be interpreted in light of the oppositional model of tolerance [32]: pharmacological manipulations, either by switching or augmentation (steps 1 and 2) may propel depressive illness into a refractory phase, characterized by low remission, high relapse, and high intolerance (steps 3 and 4).”
  • Resistance to re-challenge, loss of clinical effects, paradoxical reactions, withdrawal and postwithdrawal syndromes tend to cluster and may share a common mechanism subsumed under the oppositional model of tolerance.

    “Resistance to re-challenge, loss of clinical effects, paradoxical reactions, withdrawal and postwithdrawal syndromes tend to cluster and may share a common mechanism that has been subsumed under the rubric of oppositional model of tolerance [26, 32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Lavori PW, Dawson R. Variance of the non-parametric G-estimator: Application to randomized trials of adaptive treatment strategies. Clinical Trials. 2007 To appear. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavori, P. W., & Dawson, R.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Medicine
Published
2008-02-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
443-453
ISSN
  • 0066-4219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-326X
OpenAlex
W2145829640
Cited by
113
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051481, K08MH001481)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
adaptive treatment strategies, chronic disease management, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, treatment response biomarkers, treatment decision-making, optimal treatment strategy, clinical trial design, ecological validity
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Clinical Protocols, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review