Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of survival data by the proportional odds model

Bennett, Steve·1983·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

A model is presented for the analysis of lifetime data in which the rates of mortality for separate groups of patients converge with time. A non‐parametric estimate is given for the survivor function. The theoretical basis for the model assumes that prognostic factors have a multiplicative effect on the odds against survival beyond any given time. The model is fitted to data using maximum likelihood estimation, and an example of its use in the analysis of a lung cancer trial is given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.4780020223

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, S.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
273-277
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2168494806
Cited by
465
References
14
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.