CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58

A multiple imputation strategy for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials

Shortreed, Susan M., Laber, Eric, Scott Stroup, T., Pineau, Joelle, Murphy, Susan A.·2014·Statistics in Medicine
DOI 10.1002/sim.6223PMC PMC4184954
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.6223

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. [1]Lavori PW Dawson R A design for testing clinical strategies: Biased adaptive within-subject Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 2000 163 19 38
  2. [2]Lavori PW Dawson R Dynamic treatment regimes: practical design considerations Clinical Trials 2003 1 9 20 16281458
  3. [3]Murphy SA An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies Statistics in Medicine 2005 24 1455 1481 15586395
  4. [4]Moodie EEM Richardson TR Stephens DA Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes Biometrics 2007 63 2 447 55 17688497
  5. [5]Wahed AS Tsiatis AA Optimal estimator for the survival distribution and related quantities for treatment policies in two-stage randomised designs in clinical trials Biometrics 2004 60 124 33 15032782
  6. [7]Dawson R Lavori PW Placebo-free designs for evaluating new mental health treatments: the use of adaptive strategies Statistics in Medicine 2004 23 3249 3262 15490427
  7. [8]Larson RA Dodge RK Linker CA Stone RM Powell BL Lee EJ Schulman P Davey FR Frankel SR Bloomfield CD A randomized controlled trial of filgrastim during remission induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Calgb study 9111 Blood 1998 22 1556 1564 9716583
  8. [9]Lavori PW Rush AJ Wisniewski SR Alpert J Fava M Kupfer DJ Nierenberg A Quitkin FM Sackeim HA Thase ME Strengthening clinical effectiveness trials: equipoise-stratified randomization Biol Psychiatry 2001 50 792 801 11720698
  9. [10]Fava M Rush A Trivedi M Nierenberg A Thase M Sackeim HA Quitkin FM Wisniewski S Lavori PW Rosenbaum JF Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternative to relieve depression (STAR*D) study Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2003 26 2 457 84 12778843
  10. [11]Rush AJ Fava M Wisniewski SR Lavori PW Trivedi MH Sackeim HA Thase ME Nierenberg AA Quitkin FM Kashner TM Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design Controlled Clinical Trials 2004 25 19 142 15061154
  11. [12]Thall PF Millikan RE Sung HG Evaluating multiple treatment courses in clinical trials Statistics in Medicine 2000 19 1011 1028 10790677
  12. [14]Nahum-Shani I Qian M Almiral D Pelham W Gnagy B Fabiano G Yu J Q-learning: A data analysis method for constructing adaptive interventions Psychological Methods 2012 PMC3747013 23025434
  13. [16]Stroup TS McEvoy JP Swartz MS Byerly MJ Glick ID Canive JM McGee M Simpson GM Stevens MD Lieberman JA The National Institute of Mental Health clinical antipsychotic trials of intervention effectiveness (CATIE) project: schizophrenia trial design and protocol development Schizophrenia Bulletin 2003 29 1 15 31 12908658
  14. [18]Robins JM Causal inference from complex longitudinal data 1997 120 69 117 Springer-Verlag, Inc.
  15. [19]Murphy SA van der Laan MJ Robins JM Marginal mean models for dynamic treatment regimes Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001 96 1410 24 20019887 PMC2794446
  16. [20]Murphy SM Optimal dynamic treatment regimes Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2003 65 2 331 366
  17. [21]Robins JM Lin DY Heagerty P Optimal structural nested models for optimal sequential decisions Proceedings of the Second Seattle Symposium on Biostatistics 2004 189 326 Springer New York, NY, USA
  18. [22]Little RJA Rubin DB Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 1987 J Wiley & Sons New York, NY, USA
  19. [23]National Research Council The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials 2010 The National Academies Press Washington, D.C. URL http://www.nap.edu/ 24983040
  20. [24]Rubin DB Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys 1987 J Wiley & Sons New York, NY, USA
  21. [26]Landrum MB Becker MP A multiple imputation strategy for incomplete longitudinal data Statistics in Medicine 2001 20 2741 2760 11523080
  22. [27]Wood AM White IR Hillsdon M Carpenter J Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes International Journal of Epidemiology 2001 34 89 99 15333619
  23. [29]Tang L Song J Belin TR Unützer J A comparison of imputation methods in a longitudinal randomized clinical trial Statistics in Medicine 2005 24 2111 2128 15889392
  24. [30]Swartz MS Perkins DO Stroup TS McEvoy JP Nieri JM Haal DD Assessing clinical and functional outcomes in the clinical antipsychotic of intervention effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia trial Schizophrenia Bulletin 2003 29 1 33 43 12908659
  25. [31]Lieberman JA Stroup TS McEvoy JP Swartz MS Rosenheck RA Perkins DO Keefe RSE Davis S Davis CE Lebowitz BD Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia New England Journal of Medicine 2005 353 12 1209 23 16172203
  26. [32]McEvoy JP Lieberman JA Stroup TS Davis S Meltzer HY Rosenheck RA Swartz MS Perkins DO Keefe RSE Davis CE Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment American Journal of Psychiatry 2006 163 600 610 16585434
  27. [33]Stroup TS Lieberman JA McEvoy JP Davis SM Meltzer HY Rosenheck RA Swartz MS Perkins DO Keefe RSE Davis CE Effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia following discontinuation of a previous atypical antipsychotic American Journal of Psychiatry 2006 163 611 622 16585435
  28. [34]Adams CE Schizophrenia trials: past, present and future Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2002 11 13 144 51 12451959
  29. [35]Kay SR Flazbein A Opler LA The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia Schizophrenia Bulletin 1987 13 2 261 76 3616518
  30. [36]Usher K Foster K Park T The metabolic syndrome and schizophrenia: the latest evidence and nursing guidelines for management Journal of Psychiatry Mental Health Nursing 2006 13 6 730 4 17087676
  31. [37]Rummel-Kluge C Komossa K Schwarz S Hunger H Schmid F Lobos CA Kissling W Davis JM Leucht S Head-to-head comparisons of metabolic side effects of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Schizophrenia Research 2010 123 2 225 33 20692814 PMC2957510
  32. [44]Kennickell AB Multiple imputation and disclosure control: the case of the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances 1997 248 267 The National Academies Press Washington, D.C.
  33. [45]van Buuren S Boshuizen HC Knook DL Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis Statistics in Medicine 1999 18 681 694 10204197
  34. [48]Heeringa SG Little RJA Raghunathan TE Multivariate imputation of coarsened survey data on household wealth 2002 357 371 Wiley New York
  35. [49]Faris PD Ghali WA Brant R Norris CM Galbraith PD Knudtson ML Multiple imputation versus data enhancement for dealing with missing data in observational health care outcome analyses Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002 55 184 191 11809357
  36. [50]Abayomi K Gelman A Levy M Diagnostics for multivariate imputations Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 2008 57 273 291
  37. [51]Nevalainen J Kenward MG Virtanen SM Missing values in longitudinal dietary data: A multiple imputation approach based on a fully conditional specification Statistics in Medicine 2009 28 3657 3669 19757484
  38. [52]Stuart EA Azur M Frangakis C Leaf P Multiple imputation with large data sets: A case study of the children’s mental health initiative American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 169 9 1133 1139 19318618 PMC2727238
  39. [53]He Y Zaslavsky AM Landrum MB Harringon DP Catalano P Multiple imputation in a large-scale complex survey: a practical guide Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2009 1 18 PMC2891890 19654173
  40. [54]Gelman A Speed TP Characterizing a joint probability distribution by conditionals Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 1993 55 185 188
  41. [58]Schafer JL Yucel RM Computational strategies for multivariate linear mixed models with missing values Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2002 11 1 421 442
  42. [61]Horton N Kleinman KP Much ado about nothing: a comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models American Statistician 2007 61 1 79 90 17401454 PMC1839993
  43. [63]van Buuren S Groothuis-Oudshoorn K MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R Journal of Statistical Software 2011 forthcoming
  44. [64]Gelman A Mechelen IV Verbeke G Heitjan DF Meulders M Multiple imputation for model checking: Completed-data plots with missing and latent data Biometrics 2005 61 74 85 15737080
  45. [65]Robins JM Orellana L Rotnitzky A Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies Statistics in Medicine 2008 27 4678 4721 18646286
  46. [66]Nahum-Shani I Qian M Almirall D Pelham WE Gnagy GA Beth Fabiano Waxmonsky JG Yu J Murphy SA Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions Psychological Methods 2012 in press PMC3825557 23025433
  47. [67]Orellana L Rotnitzky A Robins JM Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, part II: Proofs and additional results The International Journal of Biostatistics 2010 6 PMC2854089 20405047
  48. [68]Robins JM Rotnitzky A Zhao LP Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995 90 106 121
  49. [69]Heijtan DF Rubin DB Ignorability and coarse data Annals of Statistics 1991 19 2244 2253
  50. [70]Carpenter JR Kenward MG White IR Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2007 16 3 259 75 17621471

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shortreed, S. M., Laber, E., Scott Stroup, T., Pineau, J., & Murphy, S. A.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-11
Volume
33
Issue
24
Pages
4202-4214
ISSN
0277-6715
DOI
10.1002/sim.6223
PMC
PMC4184954
Cited by
58
References
6
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2017-03-14)
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 447 d)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 MH080015, P50 DA10075, P01 CA142538)
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Canadian Institute for Health Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review