Cited by 55Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Assessing Real-Time Moderation for Developing Adaptive Mobile Health Interventions for Medical Interns: Micro-Randomized Trial

Open access
NeCamp, Timothy, Sen, Srijan, Frank, Elena, Walton, Maureen A, Ionides, Edward L, Fang, Yu, Tewari, Ambuj, Wu, Zhenke·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Background: Individuals in stressful work environments often experience mental health issues, such as depression. Reducing depression rates is difficult because of persistently stressful work environments and inadequate time or resources to access traditional mental health care services. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions provide an opportunity to deliver real-time interventions in the real world. In addition, the delivery times of interventions can be based on real-time data collected with a mobile device. To date, data and analyses informing the timing of delivery of mHealth interventions are generally lacking. Objective: This study aimed to investigate when to provide mHealth interventions to individuals in stressful work environments to improve their behavior and mental health. The mHealth interventions targeted 3 categories of behavior: mood, activity, and sleep. The interventions aimed to improve 3 different outcomes: weekly mood (assessed through a daily survey), weekly step count, and weekly sleep time. We explored when these interventions were most effective, based on previous mood, step, and sleep scores. Methods: We conducted a 6-month micro-randomized trial on 1565 medical interns. Medical internship, during the first year of physician residency training, is highly stressful, resulting in depression rates several folds higher than those of the general population. Every week, interns were randomly assigned to receive push notifications related to a particular category (mood, activity, sleep, or no notifications). Every day, we collected interns’ daily mood valence, sleep, and step data. We assessed the causal effect moderation by the previous week’s mood, steps, and sleep. Specifically, we examined changes in the effect of notifications containing mood, activity, and sleep messages based on the previous week’s mood, step, and sleep scores. Moderation was assessed with a weighted and centered least-squares estimator. Results: We found that the previous week’s mood negatively moderated the effect of notifications on the current week’s mood with an estimated moderation of −0.052 (P=.001). That is, notifications had a better impact on mood when the studied interns had a low mood in the previous week. Similarly, we found that the previous week’s step count negatively moderated the effect of activity notifications on the current week’s step count, with an estimated moderation of −0.039 (P=.01) and that the previous week’s sleep negatively moderated the effect of sleep notifications on the current week’s sleep with an estimated moderation of −0.075 (P<.001). For all three of these moderators, we estimated that the treatment effect was positive (beneficial) when the moderator was low, and negative (harmful) when the moderator was high. Conclusions: These findings suggest that an individual’s current state meaningfully influences their receptivity to mHealth interventions for mental health. Timing interventions to match an individual’s state may be critical to maximizing the efficacy of interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03972293; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03972293

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/15033

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [46]Miller WR Rollnick S Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. Second Edition 2002 New York, US The Guilford Press
  2. [49]Bandura A Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory 1986 Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Prentice Hall
  3. [65]Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition 1988 Mahwah, New Jersey, United States Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NeCamp, T., Sen, S., Frank, E., Walton, M. A., Ionides, E. L., Fang, Y., Tewari, A., & Wu, Z.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
NeCamp, Timothy
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
e15033
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013613965
Cited by
55
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CAREER, 1452099)
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (LSRG-0-059-16)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Michigan Institute for Data Science, University of Michigan
  • Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan (P30 CA046592)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101459)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA046592)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
push notifications, medical interns, physician depression, occupational stress, mood, physical activity, sleep, moderation, micro-randomized trial, step count, sleep duration, mood valence, physician well-being, smartphone data collection, wearable activity trackers, sleep trackers
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review