Cited by 30Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Assessment of Allostatic Overload in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure by Clinimetric Criteria: Allostatic Overload in Congestive Heart Failure

Guidi, Jenny, Offidani, Emanuela, Rafanelli, Chiara, Roncuzzi, Renzo, Sonino, Nicoletta, Fava, Giovanni A.·2016·Stress and Health

Abstract

The precipitating role of emotional stress in the development of congestive heart failure (CHF) is a long-standing clinical observation. We employed new clinimetric criteria for the assessment of allostatic overload (AO) in a sample of CHF patients, with regard to its associations with psychological distress and health status. Allostatic overload was assessed by a semi-structured interview based on clinimetric criteria in 70 consecutive outpatients with CHF. One observer-rated scale and two self-rating questionnaires for psychological distress were administered. Cardiac variables were also collected at intake. Twenty-three patients (32.9%) were classified as having AO according to clinimetric criteria. Significant differences were found with regard to gender, with women being more likely to report AO than men (23.5% versus 57.9%). Patients with AO presented significantly higher levels of psychological distress (based on scales administered) compared with those who did not. Among cardiac risk factors, hyperglycaemia was found to be significantly associated with the presence of AO. The use of the clinimetric criteria provides a global index for identifying distress that might adversely influence the course and progression of CHF. It may be of use in clinical practice, leading to therapeutic suggestions such as lifestyle modifications and psychotherapy to help patients deal with their difficulties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2579

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guidi, J., Offidani, E., Rafanelli, C., Roncuzzi, R., Sonino, N., & Fava, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Ospedale Bellaria (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Guidi, Jenny
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-30
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
63-69
ISSN
  • 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-3005
OpenAlex
W1822739159
Cited by
30
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stress and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino, Italy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
allostatic overload, congestive heart failure, psychological distress, emotional stress, hyperglycemia, gender differences, health status, psychotherapy, lifestyle modification
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status, Heart Failure, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Allostasis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review