Cited by 44Stress Responses and CortisolHealth disparities and outcomesHealth, psychology, and well-being

Psychobiological correlates of allostatic overload in a healthy population

Offidani, Emanuela, Ruini, Chiara·2012·Brain Behavior and Immunity

Abstract

The concept of allostatic load (AL) represents the cost of the continual adjustment of the internal milieu required by an organism to adapt to different challenges. The majority of studies concerning AL have focused mainly on identifying its biological components. Recently, new criteria for a clinimetric evaluation of AL have been introduced, adding a new definition of allostatic overload (AO). This study aims to identify psychological and biological correlates of AO in a population of blood donors, according to this new definition of AO. Participants included 240 blood donors recruited from May 2007 to December 2009 in 4 different blood Centers. Blood samples from each participant were collected for laboratory analysis and self-rating instruments were administered on the same day. Biological parameters included those usually assessed during blood donation. Individuals were selected based on the criteria for the clinimetric evaluation of AO. Differences in biomarkers between subjects with and without allostatic overload were performed using the GLM with biological measures as dependent variables, AO groups as the fixed factor and specific confounders as covariates. Based on the selection criteria for allostatic overload, 98 subjects have been identified as presenting with AO. Results showed that individuals with allostatic overload presented lower levels of serum proteins, erythrocytes and immune differential count than donors without allostatic overload. Further, greater mean corpuscular volume has been found in persons included in the AO group. The evaluation of the AO correlates, along with a biomarker profile, may help to identify those conditions that, by exceeding individual resources, may constitute a danger to health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.09.009

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Offidani, E., & Ruini, C.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Offidani, Emanuela
Venue
Brain Behavior and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
284-291
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073648308
Cited by
44
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
allostatic overload, allostatic load, blood donors, biomarkers, serum proteins, erythrocytes, mean corpuscular volume, healthy population
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Alanine Transaminase, Blood Donors, Blood Proteins, Female, Health Status, Humans, Immunity, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Physiological, Biomarkers, Allostasis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review