Cited by 88

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Petting away pre‐exam stress: The effect of therapy dog sessions on student well‐being

Ward‐Griffin, Emma, Klaiber, Patrick, Collins, Hanne K., Owens, Rhea L., Coren, Stanley, Chen, Frances S.·2018·Stress and Health

Abstract

Recently, many universities have implemented programmes in which therapy dogs and their handlers visit college campuses. Despite the immense popularity of therapy dog sessions, few randomized studies have empirically tested the efficacy of such programmes. The present study evaluates the efficacy of such a therapy dog programme in improving the well‐being of university students. This research incorporates two components: (a) a pre/post within‐subjects design, in which 246 participants completed a brief questionnaire immediately before and after a therapy dog session and (b) an experimental design with a delayed‐treatment control group, in which all participants completed baseline measures and follow‐up measures approximately 10 hr later. Only participants in the experimental condition experienced the therapy dog session in between the baseline and follow‐up measures. Analyses of pre/post data revealed that the therapy dog sessions had strong immediate benefits, significantly reducing stress and increasing happiness and energy levels. In addition, participants in the experimental group reported a greater improvement in negative affect, perceived social support, and perceived stress compared with those in the delayed‐treatment control group. Our results suggest that single, drop‐in, therapy dog sessions have large and immediate effects on students' well‐being, but also that the effects after several hours are small.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2804

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1080/0144341940140306 · DOI
  2. 10.3200/JACH.57.5.545-548 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/ijerph8051308 · DOI
  4. 10.2752/089279300786999743 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/08927936.2017.1335097 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/08927936.2016.1181364 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/08927936.2015.1070008 · DOI
  9. Crump C., 2015, Effects of pet therapy on the psychological and physiological stress levels of first‐year female undergraduates, North American Journal of Psychology, 17, 575
  10. Dell C. A., 2015, PAWSing student stress: A pilot evaluation study of the St. John Ambulance Therapy Dog Program on three university campuses in Canada, Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 49, 332
  11. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/13811118.2015.1054055 · DOI
  13. 10.3390/ijerph14050483 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s10755-017-9392-0 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10004-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/13607863.2014.997191 · DOI
  17. McDonald S., 2017, Effects of novel dog exposure on college students' stress prior to examination, North American Journal of Psychology, 19, 477
  18. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01612.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ward‐Griffin, E., Klaiber, P., Collins, H. K., Owens, R. L., Coren, S., & Chen, F. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
  • Counseling Psychology and Community Services University of North Dakota Grand Forks ND USA
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-12
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
468-473
ISSN
  • 1532-3005
  • 1532-2998
Cited by
88
References
5
Language
en
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2015-00412)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review