The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Petting away pre‐exam stress: The effect of therapy dog sessions on student well‐being
Abstract
Recently, many universities have implemented programmes in which therapy dogs and their handlers visit college campuses. Despite the immense popularity of therapy dog sessions, few randomized studies have empirically tested the efficacy of such programmes. The present study evaluates the efficacy of such a therapy dog programme in improving the well‐being of university students. This research incorporates two components: (a) a pre/post within‐subjects design, in which 246 participants completed a brief questionnaire immediately before and after a therapy dog session and (b) an experimental design with a delayed‐treatment control group, in which all participants completed baseline measures and follow‐up measures approximately 10 hr later. Only participants in the experimental condition experienced the therapy dog session in between the baseline and follow‐up measures. Analyses of pre/post data revealed that the therapy dog sessions had strong immediate benefits, significantly reducing stress and increasing happiness and energy levels. In addition, participants in the experimental group reported a greater improvement in negative affect, perceived social support, and perceived stress compared with those in the delayed‐treatment control group. Our results suggest that single, drop‐in, therapy dog sessions have large and immediate effects on students' well‐being, but also that the effects after several hours are small.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of studies reported reductions in stress and anxiety levels in the intervention group, but four did not yield statistically significant results.
“Although the majority of studies reported reductions in stress and anxiety levels in the intervention group, four of them did not yield statistically significant results [13, 58, 60, 68].”
From Canine-assisted therapy in reducing stress and anxiety levels of university students: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Ward-Griffin et al. [68] reported the smallest significant effect size of -0.129 (95% CI [-0.379, 0.122]).
“while Ward-Griffin et al. [68] reported the smallest significant effect size of -0.129 (95% CI [-0.379, 0.122]).”
From Canine-assisted therapy in reducing stress and anxiety levels of university students: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-b · Cited by 6,643
A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006824100041 · Cited by 4,071
Psychological distress in university students: A comparison with general population data
Stallman, H. M. (2010) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050067.2010.482109 · Cited by 1,372
Social support and mental health among college students.
Hefner, J., & Eisenberg, D. (2009) · American Journal of Orthopsychiatry · doi:10.1037/a0016918 · Cited by 810
Changes in undergraduate students’ psychological well‐being as they progress through university
Bewick, B., Koutsopoulou, G., Miles, J., Slaa, E., & Barkham, M. (2010) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070903216643 · Cited by 597
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1080/0144341940140306 · DOI
- 10.3200/JACH.57.5.545-548 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph8051308 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279300786999743 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08927936.2017.1335097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08927936.2016.1181364 · DOI
- 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08927936.2015.1070008 · DOI
- Crump C., 2015, Effects of pet therapy on the psychological and physiological stress levels of first‐year female undergraduates, North American Journal of Psychology, 17, 575
- Dell C. A., 2015, PAWSing student stress: A pilot evaluation study of the St. John Ambulance Therapy Dog Program on three university campuses in Canada, Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 49, 332
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13811118.2015.1054055 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph14050483 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10755-017-9392-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10004-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/13607863.2014.997191 · DOI
- McDonald S., 2017, Effects of novel dog exposure on college students' stress prior to examination, North American Journal of Psychology, 19, 477
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01612.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sim, S. Q., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Wang, S., & Nisa, C. (2025) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-025-04955-2 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Ward‐Griffin, E., Klaiber, P., Collins, H. K., Owens, R. L., Coren, S., & Chen, F. S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- Counseling Psychology and Community Services University of North Dakota Grand Forks ND USA
- Venue
- Stress and Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-473
- ISSN
- 1532-3005
- 1532-2998
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2015-00412)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review