Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Group-Administered Canine Therapy on University Students’ Wellbeing: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Binfet, John-Tyler·2017·Anthrozoös

Abstract

University students with elevated stress levels are at risk for experiencing compromised mental health and for underperforming academically. In an effort to support student wellbeing, post-secondary campuses are increasingly offering canine therapy programs. These programs provide students opportunities to interact with dogs known for their calm public behavior, docile temperaments, and eagerness to interact with strangers. Despite the interest in canine therapy, there remains a paucity of research attesting to the benefits of this approach to support university student wellbeing. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a group-administered, single-session canine therapy intervention on university students’ perceptions of stress, homesickness, and affinity to campus. Participants (n = 163) were randomly assigned to a treatment (n = 84, 20-minute exposure to therapy dog, handler, and fellow students) condition or a business-as-usual control (n = 79, 20 minutes of individual studying) condition. No baseline differences were identified between the two groups. Findings revealed a significant main effect for group, and when compared with the control group, participants in the treatment group showed significant decreases from pre-test to post-test in perceived stress, homesickness (dislike), and homesickness (attachment), and significant improvements in sense of school belonging. Interestingly, control group scores on homesickness (dislike) also differed significantly fr…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08927936.2017.1335097

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02681.x · DOI
  2. 10.1080/08927936.2015.1069988 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2466/pr0.96.3.713-729 · DOI
  4. 10.1207/s15326985ep3203_1 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/15298868.2012.736690 · DOI
  6. 10.1375/ajgc.20.1.41 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/87568225.2011.556947 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/aft.2012.3 · DOI
  9. 10.3928/02793695-20091103-96 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/jclp.22410 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00024-9 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/08927936.2015.1070008 · DOI
  14. Crump C., 2015, North American Journal of Psychology, 17, 575
  15. 10.1080/87568225.2015.976100 · DOI
  16. Dell C. A., 2015, Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 49, 332
  17. 10.1080/07448481.2011.619611 · DOI
  18. Durand-Bush N., 2015, Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 49, 253
  19. 10.1007/s10879-014-9274-z · DOI
  20. 10.1002/da.20321 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/ijerph14050483 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.08.007 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/01460860118472 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0963721411415220 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Herzog H., 2014, Psychology Today
  26. 10.1188/08.ONF.225-232 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1080/07448481.2011.608393 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/smi.1382 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11916-013-0322-2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/019394502320555403 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/2156587214533570 · DOI
  32. 10.1348/147608305X60523 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/10691316.2011.624934 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/03098770600617513 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Rossetti J., 2010, Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 48, 45
  36. 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.530 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0013916510361872 · DOI
  38. 10.1037/0021-843X.102.2.282 · DOI
  39. Serpell J. A., 1996, In the company of animals: A study of human–animal relationships.
  40. 10.1521/jsyt.2008.27.4.5 · DOI
  41. 10.3390/ani3010127 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/15401383.2014.892862 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01813.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.008 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.04.004 · DOI
  46. 10.2752/175303709X434176 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Wilson E. O., 1984, Biophilia, 10.4159/9780674045231 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/03004430.2012.693486 · DOI
  49. 10.1017/aft.2012.8 · DOI
  50. Zumbo B. D., 1999, Advances in Social Science Methodology, 5, 269

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Binfet, J.-T.
Affiliations
Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Canada
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2017-07-03
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
397-414
ISSN
  • 0892-7936
  • 1753-0377
Cited by
69
References
17
Language
en
Funders
University of British Columbia (F14-04224)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review