Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination
Abstract
A firm's innovativeness is driven by its ability to recombine existing technologies. Elaborating on this argument, we contend that there exist two distinct types of recombinant capabilities. First, firms may innovate through recombinant creation, i.e., by creating technological combinations new to the firm. Second, they may innovate through recombinant reuse; i.e., by reconfiguring combinations already known to the firm. We study what drives each type of capability by examining two factors: the degree of integration of a firm's intraorganizational network and the diversity of its knowledge base. We test our theoretical predictions using data on 126 semiconductor firms between 1984 and 2003. Our analyses indicate that factors that favor recombinant creation generally hinder recombinant reuse and vice versa; however, combining an integrated collaboration network and a diverse knowledge base may concurrently enhance both recombinant capabilities . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Firms can adjust their inter-unit connectivity through having a strong collaboration network that assists interunit transfers.
“Firms can adjust their inter-unit connectivity through having a strong collaboration network that assists interunit transfers”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as Carnabuci & Operti, 2013
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · see citing works
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557 · see citing works
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157 · see citing works
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · see citing works
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093 · see citing works
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839 · see citing works
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297 · see citing works
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324 · see citing works
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · see citing works
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anand, J., McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00426-1 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Copy, transform, combine: Exploring the remix as a form of innovation
Flath, C. M., Friesike, S., Wirth, M., & Thiesse, F. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0043-9 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E.
- Affiliations
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
- École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Carnabuci, Gianluca
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-26
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1591-1613
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2098298922
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 47.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National University of Singapore
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Keywords
- intra-organizational networks, innovation, network integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review