The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief
Abstract
Stakeholder theory suggests a relationship between corporate social responsibility ( CSR ) and corporate financial performance ( CFP ) because certain stakeholders reward certain types of CSR . This argument assumes that stakeholders attend to firms' CSR activities—an assumption that has yet to be examined. We fill this gap by extending stakeholder theory to the context of stakeholder attention to firm CSR and exploring the antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief CSR . We test the resulting hypotheses on a sample of public companies that engaged in natural disaster relief efforts, finding that stakeholder attention partially mediated the relationship between disaster relief and CFP and that stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief was driven by the legitimacy, urgency, and enactment of disaster relief CSR initiatives. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS TO PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES.
TURBAN, D. B., & GREENING, D. W. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257057 · Cited by 3,149
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
Cited by
Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2277 · Cited by 1,018
ESG: Research Progress and Future Prospects
Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132111663 · Cited by 779
A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature: Toward a Multi-Theoretical Integration
Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315617241 · Cited by 697
Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic
Carlos, W. C., & Lewis, B. W. (2018) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839217695089 · Cited by 393
Varadarajan, R. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0461-6 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Madsen, P. M., & Rodgers, Z. J.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-18
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 776-794
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1913555304
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.2246
- The paper
- Madsen, P. M., & Rodgers, Z. J. (2015). Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
