The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making
Abstract
Strategic decision‐making can be viewed as a special kind of decision‐making under uncertainty. Such decision‐making involves the activities of goal formulation, problem identification, alternatives generation, and evaluation/selection. Researchers in cognitive psychology and behavioural decision theory have identified a number of cognitive simplification processes which may affect the way decision‐makers perform these tasks. Within this paper, the research on these processes is summarized and their possible effects on strategic decision‐making are discussed. Implications for future research in this area are also drawn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Perception and Misperception in International Politics
Jervis, R. (2017) · doi:10.1515/9781400885114 · Cited by 3,199
The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action
Staw, B. M. (1981) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285694 · Cited by 1,693
Managerial myopia: Self-serving biases in organizational planning.
Larwood, L., & Whittaker, W. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.194 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256971 · Cited by 1,082
Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130803 · Cited by 939
Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.262 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwenk, C. R.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-128
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2163957896
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250050203
- The paper
- Schwenk, C. R. (1984). Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
