The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internal differentiation within multinational corporations
Abstract
This paper argues that the internal structure in complex, multi‐unit organizations such as a multinational corporation (MNC) is not homogeneous throughout the organization, but is systematically differentiated so as to ‘fit’ the different environmental and resource contingencies faced by the different national subsidiaries. Based on a survey of 66 of the largest European and North American MNCs, yielding data on 618 cases of headquarters‐subsidiary relations, it is shown that the different contextual conditions faced by the different subsidiaries of the MNC can be meaningfully classified into four generic situations. Furthermore, for each of these situations the exchange relation between the MNC headquarters and the subsidiary is characterized by a ‘fit’ governance structure consisting of a different combination of structural elements such as centralization of authority, formalization of rules and systems, and normative integration of members. Following the existing literature, these ‘fit’ structures are labeled in this paper as hierarchical, federative, clan and integrative. The multinational is then described as an internally differentiated organization in which each headquarters‐subsidiary link corresponds to one or the other of these administrative forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emerson, R. M. (1976) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 · Cited by 3,457
Cited by
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255638 · Cited by 1,254
Influences on Human Resource Management Practices in Multinational Corporations
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Nohria, N. (1994) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490199 · Cited by 914
Self-citationKnowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business
Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J., Hannigan, T. J., Mudambi, R., & Song, J. (2016) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2016.8 · Cited by 367
The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential
Grant, R., & Phene, A. (2022) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1399 · Cited by 180
Bernacchio, C., & Foss, N. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4736313 · Cited by 17
The Multinational Corporation as a Playing Field of Power: A Bourdieusian Approach
Delmestri, G., & Brumana, M. (2017) · Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20160000049011 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 323-337
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2036699589
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.