The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 30 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms
Open accessAbstract
Abstract A central part of the innovation process concerns the way firms go about organizing search for new ideas that have commercial potential. New models of innovation have suggested that many innovative firms have changed the way they search for new ideas, adopting open search strategies that involve the use of a wide range of external actors and sources to help them achieve and sustain innovation. Using a large‐scale sample of industrial firms, this paper links search strategy to innovative performance, finding that searching widely and deeply is curvilinearly (taking an inverted U‐shape) related to performance. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We find that firms who have open search strategies-those who search widely and deeply-tend to be more innovative.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“finding that searching widely and deeply is curvilinearly (taking an inverted U-shape) related to performance.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · hedged
“However, we find that the benefits to openness are subject to decreasing returns, indicating that there is a point where additional search becomes unproductive.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of our control variables, the parameters for R&D intensity (RDINT), the scope of the market (GEOMARKET), and collaboration in innovative activities (COLLAB) are consistently positive and significant in explaining the proportion of sales due Strat.Mgmt.J., 27: 131-150 (2006) to novel products no matter the degree of novelty of the product.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chemicals, electrical and machinery industries exhibit the highest level of external search breath, indicating that firms in industries with medium to high levels of scientific and technological activity search widely.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Descriptive results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether or not the firm is a start-up has no positive influence on innovative performance, no matter whether or not this is conditional on the R&D intensity of the firm.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results show that in the case of INNWORLD (Model I) the parameter for DEPTH is significantly larger than for INNIMP (Model III) at the 5 percent level.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The finding is the same when INNFIRM and INNIMP are included as dependent variables (the results of these estimations are not displayed for reasons of space).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As in the case of the DEPTH variable, we detect a curvilinear relationship with INNWORLD, since the DEPTH COLLAB variable and the squared term are both significant and have the expected signs.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The outcome of this exercise shows that the size of the parameter in Model I (where the dependent variable is INNWORLD) for BREADTH is significantly smaller than the parameter in Model III (where the dependent variable is INNIMP) at the 1 percent level”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but the parameter in Model I is not significantly larger than the parameter in Model II.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- Probably not a substantial claim. 34
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These studies are largely based on analysis of patent citation data and patents have several serious shortcomings as indicators of innovation and innovative search.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece, 1986 source
- Partly supportedcites Levin et al., 1987 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) says industries differ substantially in patents generated per dollar of R&D and discusses the need to improve research that uses patent counts to measure innovative activity. This supports a limitation of patents as indicators of innovation, but our copy does not establish the claimed shortcomings of patent citation data as indicators of innovative search. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites Alcacer and Gittelman, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results indicate that while there are decreasing returns in innovation for increased openness in terms of breadth, no negative returns are to be detected.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results show that the dummies below the benchmark all have a negative sign-as expected-but only the dummy for the value of 0 is significant.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, the results indicate that while there are decreasing returns in innovation for increased openness in terms of external search depth, there are negative returns for 9-16 sources only.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while 4.94 percent of firms' turnover pertain to innovations new to the firm (INNFIRM)”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both the level of external search breadth and depth are highest in industries with high levels of R&D intensity and rates of innovation.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Descriptive results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, on average, firms use about seven sources of knowledge for their innovative activities”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The parameters for lead users (USER) are significant for radical and well as for incremental innovation, but not for the intermediate category (INNFIRM).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dummy above the benchmark is positive but insignificant.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the table it can be seen that on, average, 2.81 percent of firms' turnover can be attributed to products new to the world (INNWORLD)”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, from Model VII in Table 5, it can be seen that the interaction effects between R&D intensity and both BREADTH and DEPTH are significant at the 5 percent level, but they have negative signs, indicating a substitution effect between internal R&D and openness.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The parameter for DEPTH of openness is the highest in the case of INNWORLD, while INNFIRM is lower and the parameter for INNIMP is the smallest to the extent that it is insignificant.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
In the paper
“This model suggests that the advantages that firms gain from internal R&D expenditure have declined.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chesbrough, 2003a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“It received a response rate of 41.7 percent (Stockdale, 2002).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Sample
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stockdale, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In contrast, Cohen andLevinthal (1989, 1990) argue that R&D has two faces: not only does R&D generate genuinely new knowledge; it also enhances the firm's ability to assimilate and exploit existing knowledge from the”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Openness and absorptive capacity
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, Chesbrough's work on the 'open innovation' model has not yet been empirically examined using a large-scale dataset and the previous literature on innovative search has not yet investigated the role of search among external actors and sources.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > INTRODUCTION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“New models of innovation have suggested that many innovative firms have changed the way they search for new ideas, adopting open search strategies that involve the use of a wide range of external actors and sources to help them achieve and sustain innovation.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · hedged
“Chesbrough (2003a) suggests that many innovative firms have shifted to an 'open innovation' model, using a wide range of external actors and sources to help them achieve and sustain innovation.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chesbrough, 2003a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · hedged
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sample was stratified by 12 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) classes and includes all main sectors of the U.K. economy, excluding public bodies, retail, and hotels and restaurants.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Sample
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interpretability, reliability, and validity of the survey were established by extensive piloting and pre-testing before implementation within different European countries and across firms from a variety of industrial sectors, including services, construction and manufacturing.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Sample
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The response rates for different sectors, regions, and size are largely consistent with the overall response pattern (Stockdale, 2002).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Sample
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stockdale, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our subsample of the survey includes 2707 manufacturing firms and draw from the entire U.K. manufacturing sector.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Sample
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CIS data offer 'a direct measure of success in commercializing innovations for a broad range of industries . . .that more traditional measures may not capture' (Leiponen and Helfat, 2003).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Sample
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leiponen and Helfat, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A further limitation of the present paper has to do with the fact that we have focused on the distinction between incremental and radical innovations only.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the list of sources on the questionnaire is not fully comprehensive, it is extensive and the items are not mutually exclusive.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Independent variables
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The variables reflecting the innovative performance of firms are highly skewed and, accordingly, the pattern observed in the empirical distribution is better represented by lognormal distributions.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the present study examined different external search strategies for innovative ideas across different knowledge sources, it did not investigate the role of the type and nature of the technological trajectory that a firm may be exploring (as in the case of Katila and Ahuja) and how its approach to this trajectory may influence its innovative performance.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As in the case of BREADTH and DEPTH, the eight dummies are subsequently added up so that each firm gets a score of 0 when no partners are used, while the firm gets a value of 8 when the firm is collaborating with all potential collaboration partners (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.83).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Independent variables
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lack of openness of firms to their external environment may reflect an organizational myopia, indicating that managers may overemphasize internal sources and under emphasize external sources.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although our variable is a relatively simple construct, it has a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.93).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Independent variables
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The sources listed in the survey overlap with the resources and institutions that are considered part of the national innovation system (Lundvall, 1992;Nelson, 1993;Spencer, 2001).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Independent variables
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“As Chesbrough suggests, firms that are too internally focused may miss opportunities, as many knowledge sources necessary to achieve innovation can only be found outside the firm.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chesbrough
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“This finding is consistent with the findings from previous studies (see Cohen, 1995;Laursen and Foss, 2003).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Cohen, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Laursen and Foss, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As in the case of BREADTH, the 16 sources are subsequently added up so that each firm gets a score of 0 when no knowledge sources are used to a high degree, while the firm gets the value of 16 when all knowledge sources are used to a high degree (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.76).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Independent variables
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Past research suggests that firms producing simple or discrete technologies that are artefactually simple, that is, they involve relatively few components and clear interfaces between modules, or that rely on a small number of knowledge bases, will tend to search more narrowly than firms involved in the design and development of complex technologies (Nelson and Winter, 1982).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nelson and Winter, 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Openness to external sources allows firms to draw in ideas from outsiders to deepen the pool of technological opportunities available to them.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“However, a very similar variable to that of the variable measuring search breadth has been used byLaursen and Salter (2003) as a predictor of the propensity of firms to use knowledge developed at universities.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Laursen and Salter (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our approach focuses on innovative search and performance in one period and this remains a severe limitation of the study.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, it may also be the result of an additional attention allocation problem, since ideas are produced both internally and externally.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other studies, facing similar problems in terms of similar characteristics of skewness and departure from normality, have proposed a log-transformation of the Tobit model with a multiplicative exponential error term (Filippucci, Drudi, and Papalia, 1996;Papalia and Di Iorio, 2001).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Filippucci, Drudi, and Papalia, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Papalia and Di Iorio, 2001 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One likely interpretation of this result is that it is the product of the NIH syndrome-that greater attention to openness for external sources confronts internal resistance from some of the company's technical staff.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Statistical method and results
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Complex technologies, such as aeroengines, often require firms to master a wide number of different knowledge bases and to understand the interfaces and integration of a range of different components (Brusoni, Prencipe, and Pavitt, 2001).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brusoni, Prencipe, and Pavitt, 2001 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As pointed out earlier in this paper, a limitation of the framework proposed here is that it does not allow for the analysis of the importance of breadth and depth of external search to innovative performance within each individual knowledge channel.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the introduction of any variable into a well-established area of research is always contentious, the introduction of the two new variables to reflect the openness of innovative search does enable researchers to better explore the link between innovative search and innovative performance.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Independent variables
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“AlsoLeiponen and Helfat (2003) use a similar search breadth variable.”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Limitations and future research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leiponen and Helfat (2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given that many studies of innovation have found that a key source for innovations are lead users, we include a variable reflecting the use of lead users in innovation (Rothwell et al., 1974;Urban and von Hippel, 1988;von Hippel, 1988).”
§ OPEN FOR INNOVATION: THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U.K. MANUFACTURING FIRMS > Control variables
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The residuals of the Tobit model follow a lognormal distribution.
“We apply this approach to the study of innovative performance and assume a lognormal distribution for the residuals of the Tobit model.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The latent variable of innovative performance of a firm is a function of a number of explicative variables.
“It is then assumed that the latent variable of innovative performance of a firm i is a function of a number of explicative variables.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Firms are increasingly drawing in knowledge from external sources in their innovative activities.
“Firms are increasingly drawing in knowledge from external sources in their innovative activities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Modern innovation processes require firms to master highly specific knowledge about different users, technologies, and markets.
“Modern innovation processes require firms to master highly specific knowledge about different users, technologies, and markets.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Breadth dummy range differs between the text and Table 5
MinorThe text says the highest breadth dummy covers 9-16 sources, but Table 5 uses 9-14 as the benchmark and a separate dummy for 15-16 sources.
“In a similar fashion, we create dummies for the ranges of 0 sources; 1-4 sources; 5-8 sources; and for 9-16 sources.”
“| DUM BREADTH, 9-14 sources Benchmark | | | | | | | | | | | DUM BREADTH, 15-16 sources | 0.166 | 0.347 | | | | | | | |”
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,725
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,563
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 · Cited by 7,646
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Chesbrough H, 2003, Open Innovation
- Filippucci C, 1996, Testing the relevance of Tobin's approach for modelling consumption, Economic Notes, 25, 225
- Greene WH, 2000, Econometric Analysis
- LaursenK SalterAJ.2003.Searching low and high: why do firms cite universities as a source of innovation?Paper presented at the EMAEE 2003 Conference on the ‘Knowledge‐Based Economies: New Challenges in Methodology Theory and Policy’ Augsburg Germany.
- Pavitt KLR, 1989, Accumulation, diversification and organization of technological activities in U.K. companies, 1945–83, Management Science, 35, 81
- von Hippel E, 1988, The Sources of Innovation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,401–1,500 of 6,332
Absorbing in-bound knowledge within open innovation processes. The case of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Matricano, D., Candelo, E., Sorrentino, M., & Martínez‐Martínez, A. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2018-0625 · Cited by 44
Yang, Z. G. O., Huang, Z., Wang, F., & Feng, C. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.010 · Cited by 47
Performance Effects of External Search Strategies in European Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
Radičić, D., & Pugh, G. (2017) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12328 · Cited by 47
The breadth of business model reconfiguration and firm performance
Desyllas, P., Salter, A. J., & Alexy, O. T. (2020) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127020955138 · Cited by 51
“Here, the concept of depth, meaning the frequency by which one element is repeatedly used (Laursen and Salter, 2006), and the degree of interdependence between elements—that is, the likelihood that one change will also require a change in another (MacCormack et al., 2006)—represent important…”
InfluentialSelf-citationSaridakis, C., Zaefarian, G., Ganotakis, P., & Angelidou, S. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.026 · Cited by 49
Measuring the impact of relational capital on customer performance in the SME B2B sector
Agostini, L., Nosella, A., & Soranzo, B. (2017) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-10-2016-0205 · Cited by 44
Fu, X., Luan, R., Wu, H., Zhu, W., & Pang, J. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.11.005 · Cited by 46
Using transaction cost economics to explain open innovation in start-ups
Hsieh, C.-T., Huang, H., & Lee, W.-L. (2016) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-01-2016-0012 · Cited by 45
Kranz, J. J. (2021) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101656 · Cited by 43
External technology acquisition: a double-edged sword
Kang, K. H., Jo, G. S., & Kang, J. (2015) · Asian Journal of Technology Innovation · doi:10.1080/19761597.2015.1010265 · Cited by 44
The Acquisition and Commercialization of Invention in American Manufacturing: Incidence and Impact
Arora, A., Cohen, W. M., & Walsh, J. P. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20264 · Cited by 44
Malen, J., & Marcus, A. A. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650317701679 · Cited by 44
Vignieri, V. (2020) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2636 · Cited by 43
Open innovation and supply chain management in food machinery supply chain: a case study
Bigliardi, B., Bottani, E., & Galati, F. (2011) · International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology · doi:10.4314/ijest.v2i6.63715 · Cited by 44
Financial effects of open innovation in the manufacturing industry
Noh, Y. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-12-2014-0681 · Cited by 51
Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Moll, C. B., & Estellés-Miguel, S. (2019) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072 · Cited by 45
“The study of external knowledge sourcing, as a form of inbound open innovation, requires the consideration of internal capabilities that complement search strategies (for example, Brunswicker & Vanhaverbeke, 2015; Hervas-Oliver et al., 2014; Laursen & Salter, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialFoss, N. J. (2007) · European Management Review · doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500084 · Cited by 67
The Geographic Distance of Relocation Search: An Extended Resource‐Based Perspective
Knoben, J. (2011) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01123.x · Cited by 44
Environmental innovation and R&D collaborations: Firm decisions in the innovation efficiency context
Dimakopoulou, A. G., Chatzistamoulou, N., Kounetas, K. E., & Tsekouras, K. D. (2022) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-022-09963-9 · Cited by 46
Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutionsPreprint
Warnke, P., Koschatzky, K., Dönitz, E. J., Zenker, A., Stahlecker, T., Som, O., Cuhls, K. E., & Güth, S. (2022) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.24406/publica-fhg-297722 · Cited by 44
Nikabadi, M. S., & Hakaki, A. (2017) · International Journal of System Dynamics Applications · doi:10.4018/ijsda.2018010101 · Cited by 44
Recommending valuable ideas in an open innovation community
Lee, H., Choi, K., Yoo, D., et al. (2018) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-02-2017-0044 · Cited by 44
A Study of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours, Organizational Structures and Open InnovationPreprint
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Kaur, S. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2361122 · Cited by 44
Schweitzer, F. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2016) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12252 · Cited by 44
Pustovrh, A., Jaklič, M., Martin, S. A., & Rašković, M. M. (2017) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2017.1305795 · Cited by 45
New forms of collaborative innovation and production on the internet
Wittke, V., & Hanekop, H. (2011) · doi:10.17875/gup2011-287 · Cited by 43
Flamini, G., Pellegrini, M. M., Manesh, M. F., & Caputo, A. (2021) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-01-2021-0079 · Cited by 44
Rodríguez, A., Hernández, V., & Nieto, M. J. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121442 · Cited by 45
The organisation of innovation in the wine industry
Doloreux, D., & Lord‐Tarte, E. (2013) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/14601061311324520 · Cited by 41
Parmentola, A., Ferretti, M., & Panetti, E. (2020) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00671-0 · Cited by 43
Customer Integration during Innovation Development
Pedrosa, A. (2012) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00648.x · Cited by 45
The influence of the structure of social networks on academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial orientation
Diánez‐González, J. P., & Camelo‐Ordaz, C. (2017) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.009 · Cited by 46
Towards an empirical typology of buyer–supplier relationships based on absorptive capacity
Revilla, E., Sáenz, M. J., & Knoppen, D. (2013) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.748231 · Cited by 44
Bogers, M. L. A. M., Zobel, A., Afuah, A. N., et al. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2817865 · Cited by 43
Relative effectiveness of open innovation strategies in single and complex SME innovators
Radičić, D., & Alkaraan, F. (2022) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2022.2130042 · Cited by 43
A framework of interfirm open innovation: relationship and knowledge based perspectives
Fisher, G. J., & Qualls, W. J. (2018) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-11-2016-0276 · Cited by 43
Innovation organisationnelle. S'ouvrir pour innover plus ?
Duboulouz, S., & Bocquet, R. (2013) · Revue française de gestion · doi:10.3166/rfg.235.129-147 · Cited by 43
External involvement and firm performance: is time-to-market of new products a missing link?
Feng, T., Sun, L., Sohal, A. S., & Wang, D. (2013) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.828177 · Cited by 43
Crowdsourcing design decisions for optimal integration into the company innovation system
Jespersen, K. R. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.09.005 · Cited by 44
Why Do Some Patents Get Licensed While Others Do Not
Ruckman, K., & McCarthy, I. P. (2017) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtw046 · Cited by 42
Globalization and technology adoption: evidence from emerging economies
Fatima, S. T. (2017) · Journal of International Trade & Economic Development · doi:10.1080/09638199.2017.1303080 · Cited by 43
Open Innovation Projects in SMEs as an Engine for Sustainable Growth
Yoon, B., Shin, J., & Lee, S. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8020146 · Cited by 43
Bravo, M. I. R., Moreno, A. R., & Montes, F. J. L. (2016) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-02-2016-0062 · Cited by 52
Making Open Innovation Stick: A Study of Open Innovation Implementation in 756 Global Organizations
Zynga, A., Diener, K., Ihl, C., Lüttgens, D., Piller, F. T., & Scherb, B. (2018) · Research-Technology Management · doi:10.1080/08956308.2018.1471273 · Cited by 49
Go abroad or have strangers visit? On organizational search spaces and local linkages
Ebersberger, B., & Herstad, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq057 · Cited by 43
Revisiting the relationship between knowledge search breadth and firm innovation
Luo, B. N., Lui, S. S.-Y., & Kim, Y. (2017) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2015-0327 · Cited by 43
Open Innovation with Customers Foundations, Competences and International Trends
Piller, F. T., & Ihl, C. (2009) · Cited by 45
A property rights theory of competitive advantage
Bel, R. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2707 · Cited by 43
A communication perspective on open strategy and open innovation
Dobusch, L., Kremser, W., Seidl, D. N., & Werle, F. (2017) · Managementforschung · doi:10.1365/s41113-017-0015-6 · Cited by 44
Blind, K., Pohlisch, J., & Rainville, A. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09716-1 · Cited by 44
“For a more detailed justification of our conceptualization of innovation success, we refer to Aschhoff and Sofka (2009) and Laursen and Salter (2006).”
MethodUnpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies
Shi, X., Liang, X., & Luo, Y. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104783 · Cited by 51
Yang, J., & Yu, M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14042212 · Cited by 53
Industry cognitive distance in alliances and firm innovation performance
Filiou, D., & Massini, S. (2017) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12283 · Cited by 42
Enhancing innovation through gender diversity: a two-country study of top management teams
Hemmert, M., Cho, C. K., & Lee, J. Y. (2022) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-08-2021-0383 · Cited by 51
Yu, Y., Cheng, L., & Zhang, D. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103102 · Cited by 43
Kim, J., & Park, J.-H. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103087 · Cited by 41
Women in the C-Suite: A Review of Predictors, Experiences, and Outcomes
Mah, J., Kolev, K. D., McNamara, G. M., Pan, L., & Devers, C. E. (2022) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2021.0042 · Cited by 48
The Systems Perspective of National Innovation Ecosystems
Suseno, Y., & Standing, C. (2017) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2494 · Cited by 42
Park, J.-H., & Bae, Z. (2017) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2017.1310376 · Cited by 42
Song, B., Seol, H., & Park, Y. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.010 · Cited by 42
Hou, J. C., Chen, H., & Xu, J. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9030342 · Cited by 42
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Caiazza, R. (2024) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12711 · Cited by 49
Radičić, D., Douglas, D. E., Pugh, G., & Jackson, I. (2018) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919619500464 · Cited by 42
Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations
Hongdao, Q., Bibi, S., Khan, A., Ardito, L., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11041015 · Cited by 42
Li‐Ying, J., Wang, Y., & Salomo, S. (2014) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12038 · Cited by 46
Latilla, V. M., Urbinati, A., Cavallo, A., Franzò, S., & Ghezzi, A. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management · doi:10.1142/s0219877020400027 · Cited by 53
Profiting from External Innovation: A Review of Research on Open InnovationPreprint
West, J., & Bogers, M. L. A. M. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1949520 · Cited by 39
Organizational knowledge and collaborative human resource practices as determinants of innovation
Nieves, J., Quintana, A., & Osorio, J. (2016) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2014.26 · Cited by 42
Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Jackson, I., & Tomlinson, P. R. (2011) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2011.571855 · Cited by 42
R & D collaboration in the automotive innovation environment
Agostini, L., & Caviggioli, F. (2015) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2014-0407 · Cited by 42
Is organizational innovation always a good thing?
Mariano, S., & Casey, A. J. (2015) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507615569429 · Cited by 42
Assessing the performance of open innovation practices: A case study of a community of innovation
Rogo, F., Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2014) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.02.006 · Cited by 41
Li, X., Li, X., & Ding, S. Y. (2024) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-07-2023-0526 · Cited by 42
Large-scale open innovation: open source vs. patent pools
B, T. R. A., & Striukova, L. (2010) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2010.035986 · Cited by 42
The relation between R&D spending and patents: The moderating effect of collaboration networks
Bolívar–Ramos, M. T. (2017) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.11.001 · Cited by 42
Competing through innovation: Let the customer judge!
Kurtmollaiev, S., Lervik-Olsen, L., & Andreassen, T. W. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.002 · Cited by 54
Sempere-Ripoll, F., Estellés-Miguel, S., Alvarado, R. R., et al. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062261 · Cited by 42
“, [41,43,65]) and even in sustainability [34].”
BackgroundWhen agility meets open innovation: two approaches to manage inbound projects
Pellizzoni, E., Trabucchi, D., & Buganza, T. (2019) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12337 · Cited by 42
The Relevance of Different Open Innovation Strategies for R&D Performers
Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge‐Gil, A. (2010) · Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa · doi:10.1016/s1138-5758(10)70025-6 · Cited by 40
Dost, M., Badir, Y. F., Sambasivan, M., & Umrani, W. A. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101309 · Cited by 41
The role of international networks in upgrading national innovation systems
Petraite, M., Mubarak, M. F., Rimantas, R., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2022) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121873 · Cited by 36
Xie, X., Wang, H., & Jiao, H. (2019) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12369 · Cited by 41
Open innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises and innovation efficiency
Park, J.-H. (2018) · Asian Journal of Technology Innovation · doi:10.1080/19761597.2018.1496796 · Cited by 31
Enkel, E., & Bader, K. (2015) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12132 · Cited by 41
Innovation types and the search for new ideas at the fuzzy front end: Where to look and how often?
O’Brien, K. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.007 · Cited by 41
Gerlitz, L., & Prause, G. K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179742 · Cited by 48
Organizing Systemic Innovation
Jaspers, F. (2003) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 41
Karamanos, A. G. (2015) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12163 · Cited by 40
Martínez, M. G., Zouaghi, F., & Garcia, M. S. (2018) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12310 · Cited by 41
Vanhaverbeke, W. W., Belderbos, R., Duysters, G., & Beerkens, B. B. (2015) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12253 · Cited by 37
Open innovation in SMEs – towards formalization of openness
Dufour, J., & Son, P.-E. (2015) · Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.24840/2183-0606_003.003_0008 · Cited by 41
Explaining innovation in mature industries: evidences from Italian SMEs
Caiazza, R. (2015) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2015.1038511 · Cited by 42
Agbali, M., Trillo, C., Ibrahim, I. A., Arayıcı, Y., & Fernando, T. (2019) · Smart Cities · doi:10.3390/smartcities2020019 · Cited by 41
Piening, E. P., Salge, T. O., & Schäfer, S. (2016) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.01.001 · Cited by 41
Hervás-Oliver, J.-L., Parrilli, M. D., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121167 · Cited by 41
Park, S.-M. (2014) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12097 · Cited by 41
Ruiz, É., Brion, S., & Parmentier, G. (2018) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12349 · Cited by 42
Building absorptive capacity through firm openness in the context of a less-open country
Aliasghar, O., Rose, E. L., & Chetty, S. (2018) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.007 · Cited by 41
Bhatti, S. H., Santoro, G., Sarwar, A., & Pellicelli, A. C. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-06-2020-0457 · Cited by 42
Janssen, M. J., Bogers, M., & Wanzenböck, I. (2019) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2019.1618701 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Laursen, K., & Salter, A.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Salter, Ammon
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-21
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-150
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2087712586
- Cited by
- 6,324
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 336 · 2025: 337 · 2024: 357 · 2023: 381 · 2022: 423 · 2021: 406 · 2020: 430 · 2019: 424 · 2018: 444 · 2017: 438 · 2016: 366 · 2015: 373 · 2014: 383 · 2013: 313 · 2012: 276
- FWCI
- 178.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Copenhagen Business School
- Imperial College London
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-331-27-0005)
- Intelligent Manufacturing Research Center
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Keywords
- open innovation, innovation performance, external knowledge sources, search strategies, manufacturing companies, curvilinear relationship, inverted U-shaped relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
