The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo Quantum‐Dot Toxicity Assessment
Abstract
Quantum dots have potential in biomedical applications, but concerns persist about their safety. Most toxicology data is derived from in vitro studies and may not reflect in vivo responses. Here, an initial systematic animal toxicity study of CdSe–ZnS core–shell quantum dots in healthy Sprague–Dawley rats is presented. Biodistribution, animal survival, animal mass, hematology, clinical biochemistry, and organ histology are characterized at different concentrations (2.5–15.0 nmol) over short‐term (<7 days) and long‐term (>80 days) periods. The results show that the quantum dot formulations do not cause appreciable toxicity even after their breakdown in vivo over time. To generalize the toxicity of quantum dots in vivo, further investigations are still required. Some of these investigations include the evaluation of quantum dot composition (e.g., PbS versus CdS), surface chemistry (e.g., functionalization with amines versus carboxylic acids), size (e.g., 2 versus 6 nm), and shape (e.g., spheres versus rods), as well as the effect of contaminants and their byproducts on biodistribution behavior and toxicity. Combining the results from all of these studies will eventually lead to a conclusion regarding the issue of quantum dot toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials
Dobrovolskaia, M. A., & McNeil, S. E. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.223 · Cited by 1,823
Ryman-Rasmussen, J. P., Riviere, J. E., & Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700508 · Cited by 357
Cited by
The Effect of Nanoparticle Size, Shape, and Surface Chemistry on Biological Systems
Albanese, A., Tang, P. S., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124 · Cited by 3,633
Self-citationNanoparticle Size and Surface Chemistry Determine Serum Protein Adsorption and Macrophage Uptake
Walkey, C. D., Olsen, J. B., Guo, H., Emili, A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2084338 · Cited by 1,926
Self-citationDiverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationQuantum dots: bright and versatile in vitro and in vivo fluorescence imaging biosensors
Wegner, K. D., & Hildebrandt, N. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00532e · Cited by 984
In Vivo Pharmacokinetics, Long-Term Biodistribution, and Toxicology of PEGylated Graphene in Mice
Yang, K., Wan, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Lee, S.-T., & Liu, Z. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn1024303 · Cited by 848
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauck, T. S., Anderson, R. E., Fischer, H. C., Newbigging, S., & Chan, W. C. W.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-144
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2153379120
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo Quantum‐Dot Toxicity Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.200900626
- The paper
- Hauck, T. S., Anderson, R. E., Fischer, H. C., Newbigging, S., & Chan, W. C. W. (2010). In vivo Quantum‐Dot Toxicity Assessment. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200900626
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.