The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Develop Teratoma More Efficiently and Faster Than Human Embryonic Stem Cells Regardless the Site of Injection
Open accessAbstract
Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) and reprogrammed/induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) research is becoming the “flavor of the month” for downstream applications such as drug screening, disease modeling, and future regenerative medicine and cell therapies [1–4]. Pluripotency (the ability to give rise to any cell type of the three germ layers: mesoderm, ectoderm, and endoderm) is the defining feature of hESCs and iPSCs [5]. In vivo teratoma formation in immune-compromised mice is the “gold-standard” assay to define bona fide pluripotent stem cells capable of generating tumoral disorganized structures containing tissues representing the three germ layers [5, 6]. Despite the importance of teratoma assay as an extended screen for the pluripotency of hESCs and iPSCs and as in vivo assay to explore molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the biology of human teratomas and their transition to teratocarcinomas, there are no standard procedures for performing this assay [5–7]. Different studies on hESCs have correlated the site of implantation with the efficiency of teratoma formation and histology tissue composition [6, 8]. However, limited data are available regarding the teratoma development latency. More importantly, no study so far has compared side-by-side the efficiency, latency, and histological tumor composition of hESCs- and iPSCs-derived teratomas. In addition, a new generation of immunodeficient mice has been developed: the NOD/SCID IL2Rγ−/− mouse. This strain carries a IL2Rγ-chain deficiency that blocks signaling through multiple cytokine receptors leading to many innate immune defects [9, 10]. The non obese diabetic/severe combined immune-deficient (NOD/SCID) IL2Rγ−/− strain facilitates engraftment and tumor formation and does not develop thymic lymphoma, ensuring a longer lifespan of inoculated mice. Here, we followed the improved teratoma protocol previously developed by Prokhorova et al. [6, 11–13] to transplant side-by-side as few as 1 × 106 of either fully characterized undifferentiated hESCs or iPSCs in 6- to 8-week-old non obese diabetic/severe combined immune-deficient (NOD/SCID) IL2Rγ−/− mice [11, 13–15]. The following hESC lines were used: H9, H1, AND1, AND2, AND3, HS181, and ECAT. The following iPSC lines were used: MSHU-001, iAND4, CB-CD34+ iPSC1, and CB-CD34+ iPSC2. These lines have been fully characterized and deposited according to Spanish Legislation at The Spanish Stem Cell Bank (http://www.isciii.es/htdocs/terapia/terapia_lineas.jsp) [16]. Briefly, cells were resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 30% matrigel (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, http://www.bd.com) [6] and transplanted subcutaneously (200 μl volume) or by intratesticular injection (60 μl volume). Figure 1A depicts the experimental strategy used. We then analyzed efficiency, latency, and histological tumor composition. In hESCs, the rate of teratoma formation was 81% subcutaneously versus 94% intratesticularly (n = 30 mice; Fig. 1B). However, the intratesticular injection, despite showing higher efficiency of teratoma formation, displayed a slightly longer latency (66 vs. 59 days; p-value > 0.05). There were no site-specific differences in the teratoma composition at the histological level (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, when iPSCs were transplanted the rate of teratoma formation was 100% (n = 16 mice), regardless the type of injection. More importantly, iPSCs seem more aggressive in vivo as the latency was shortened 52% (from 59 days to 31 days) upon subcutaneous injection and 26% (from 66 days to 49 days) upon intratesticular injection. As with hESCs, no differences in teratoma composition were observed either. Human iPSCs form teratomas faster and with higher efficiency than hESCs regardless the site of injection. (A): Cartoon summarizing the experimental design. (B): Table summarizing the efficiency, latency, and histological analysis of the teratomas developed from both human ESCs and human iPSCs upon either subcutaneous or intratesticular transplantation. (C): Histological analysis of teratomas derived from both hESCs and iPSCs upon subcutaneous or intratesticular transplantation reveal similar tissue composition. The presence of mesodermal tissues is defined by teratoma sections containing cartilage and positive for both smooth muscle actin and melanin. The presence of ectodermal tissues was scored as teratoma sections that stained positive for β-III tubulin and presence of neural rosettes. Endoderm was defined as teratoma sections that stained positive for α-fetoprotein and pan-cytokeratin. The study was approved by the Andalusian and Spanish Embryo and Cellular Reprogramming Ethical Institutional review Board. Animal protocols were approved by the Local University Hospital Council On Animal Care and Experimentation. Abbreviations: ESCs, embryonic stem cells; iPSCs, reprogrammed/induced pluripotent stem cells. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing side-by-side the
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shultz, L. D., Lyons, B. L., Burzenski, L. M., Gott, B., Chen, X., Chaleff, S., Kotb, M., Gillies, S. D., King, M., Mangada, J., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6477 · Cited by 1,728
Prokhorova, T. A., Harkness, L. M., Frandsen, U., Ditzel, N., Schrøder, H. D., Burns, J. S., & Kassem, M. (2009) · Stem Cells and Development · doi:10.1089/scd.2007.0266 · Cited by 277
Barroso-delJesus, A., Romero-López, C., Lucena-Aguilar, G., Melen, G. J., Sanchez, L., Ligero, G., Berzal-Herranz, A., & Menendez, P. (2008) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00398-08 · Cited by 214
Self-citationDifferentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells After Transplantation in Immune‐Deficient Mice
Przyborski, S. A. (2005) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0014 · Cited by 169
Consensus Guidance for Banking and Supply of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines for Research Purposes
Initiative, T. I. S. C. B. (2009) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-009-9085-x · Cited by 162
Catalina, P., Montes, R., Ligero, G., Sánchez, L., de la Cueva, T., Bueno, C., Leone, P., & Menéndez, P. R. (2008) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/1476-4598-7-76 · Cited by 152
Self-citationA Call to Standardize Teratoma Assays Used to Define Human Pluripotent Cell Lines
Müller, F.-J., Goldmann, J. E., Löser, P., & Loring, J. F. (2010) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.009 · Cited by 145
Growth of Teratomas Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Is Influenced by the Graft Site
Cooke, M. J., Stojković, M., & Przyborski, S. A. (2006) · Stem Cells and Development · doi:10.1089/scd.2006.15.254 · Cited by 111
Bueno, C., Catalina, P., Melen, G. J., Montes, R., Sánchez, L., Ligero, G., Garcia-Perez, J. L., & Menéndez, P. R. (2009) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp169 · Cited by 68
Self-citationHuman embryonic stem cells: a journey beyond cell replacement therapies
Menéndez, P. R., Bueno, C., & Wang, L. (2006) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1080/14653240601026654 · Cited by 66
Self-citationHuman Embryonic Stem Cells: Potential Tool for Achieving Immunotolerance?
Menéndez, P. R., Bueno, C., Wang, L., & Bhatia, M. (2005) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1385/scr:1:2:151 · Cited by 64
Self-citationCortés, J. L., Sánchez, L., Ligero, G., Gutiérrez-Aranda, I., Catalina, P., Elosua, C., Leone, P. E., Montes, R., Bueno, C., Ramos–Mejía, V., et al. (2009) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep107 · Cited by 48
Self-citationCortés, J. L., Sánchez, L., Catalina, P., Cobo, F., Bueno, C., Martínez‐Ramírez, Á., Barroso, A., Cabrera, C., Ligero, G., Montes, R., et al. (2008) · Stem Cells and Development · doi:10.1089/scd.2007.0157 · Cited by 29
Self-citationBueno, C., Montes, R., Garcı́a-Castro, J., Greaves, M. F., & Menéndez, P. R. (2007) · Drug Discovery Today Disease Models · doi:10.1016/j.ddmod.2007.10.004 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Cited by
The tumorigenicity of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells
Ben-David, U., & Benvenisty, N. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3034 · Cited by 889
Kim, D.-W., Staples, M., Shinozuka, K., Pantcheva, P., Kang, S.-D., & Borlongan, C. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140611692 · Cited by 340
Interactions between mesenchymal stem cells and the immune system
Li, N., & Hua, J. (2017) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2473-5 · Cited by 338
Strategies to Improve the Safety of iPSC-Derived β Cells for β Cell Replacement in Diabetes
Pellegrini, S., Zamarian, V., & Sordi, V. (2022) · Transplant International · doi:10.3389/ti.2022.10575 · Cited by 38
Engineering islets from stem cells: The optimal solution for the treatment of diabetes
Du, S., Li, Y., Geng, Z., Zhang, Q., Buhler, L. H., Gonelle-Gispert, C., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.869514 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutierrez-Aranda, I., Ramos-Mejia, V., Bueno, C., Munoz-Lopez, M., Real, P. J., Mácia, A., Sanchez, L., Ligero, G., Garcia-Parez, J. L., & Menendez, P.
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1568-1570
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2019136342
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.