Looking Beyond the Hype: Understanding the Effects of AI on Learning
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing student learning. This reflection critically examines the promises and limitations of AI for cognitive learning processes and outcomes, drawing on empirical evidence and theoretical insights from research on AI-enhanced education and digital learning technologies. We critically discuss current publication trends in research on AI-enhanced learning and rather than assuming inherent benefits, we emphasize the role of instructional implementation and the need for systematic investigations that build on insights from existing research on the role of technology in instructional effectiveness. Building on this foundation, we introduce the ISAR model, which differentiates four types of AI effects on learning compared to learning conditions without AI, namely inversion, substitution, augmentation, and redefinition. Specifically, AI can substitute existing instructional approaches while maintaining equivalent instructional functionality, augment instruction by providing additional cognitive learning support, or redefine tasks to foster deep learning processes. However, the implementation of AI must avoid potential inversion effects, such as over-reliance leading to reduced cognitive engagement. Additionally, successful AI integration depends on moderating factors, including students’ AI literacy and educators’ technological and pedagogical skills. Our discussion underscores the need for a systematic and evidence-based approach to AI in education, advocating for rigorous research and informed adoption to maximize its potential while mitigating possible risks.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This reflection paper argues that AI’s learning benefits depend on instructional implementation rather than the technology itself, and it cautions against overhyping current AI-enhanced education research. It introduces the ISAR model—inversion, substitution, augmentation, and redefinition—to systematize how AI can affect cognitive learning processes and outcomes.
Key findings
- The ISAR model distinguishes four AI effects: inversion (over-reliance reduces cognitive engagement and learning), substitution (AI replaces non-AI instruction with equivalent functionality), augmentation (AI adds cognitive support beyond non-AI alternatives), and redefinition (AI transforms tasks to foster deep learning).
- Inversion effects are illustrated by studies where ChatGPT use was linked to shallower processing and diminished learning outcomes, including reduced cognitive processing depth and lower posttest argument quality in a scientific inquiry task, and “metacognitive laziness” in a writing revision task.
- Substitution effects are supported by meta-analyses finding no significant differences in cognitive learning effects when comparing intelligent tutoring systems with human tutoring or small-group instruction.
- Augmentation and redefinition effects are supported by meta-analyses reporting medium-to-large learning benefits for ITS versus self-reliant learning without support, small-to-medium gains versus nonadaptive or less adaptive computer-assisted learning, and small-to-medium benefits for constructive learning with ITS versus active and passive instructional methods.
Methods
- This is a reflection/conceptual paper, not an empirical study; it reports no primary sample, dataset, or new experiment.
- It draws on empirical evidence and theoretical insights from AI-enhanced education, digital learning technologies, AIED, and prior meta-analyses.
- Its main contribution is the ISAR model, which builds on the SAMR model and the ICAP-inspired SAMR model, and is used to classify AI effects and discuss conditions for successful integration.
Limitations
- The paper states that it focuses primarily on cognitive learning processes and outcomes, while noting that motivation and emotions are inextricably linked to cognitive learning but are not the main focus.
- The paper states that effective prevention strategies for inversion effects in education are yet to be explored and that research must continue advancing understanding of inversion effects.
- Evident from the text: as a reflection paper, it does not conduct a systematic review or meta-analysis, and its examples and publication-trend claims are illustrative rather than exhaustive or quantified.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 121 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Domain-specific knowledge and skills remain essential learning objectives because they empower individuals to reason, apply theoretical knowledge, and build foundations for expertise.
“Specifically, despite ubiquitous and widely-accessible information, domainspecific knowledge and skills remain essential learning objectives as they empower individuals to reason about a broad set of problems, to apply theoretical knowledge to practical problems, and to establish important foundations for expertise development in specialized fields”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greiff et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
LLMs inadvertently learn and replicate biases from the vast, biased datasets they are trained on.
“These models inadvertently learn and replicate biases from the vast, biased datasets they are trained on (Lee et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2024 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
If learners uncritically rely on information from AI systems, they risk adopting biased or incorrect information.
“If learners uncritically rely on information from AI systems, they risk adopting biased or incorrect information, an issue also observed in other contexts, such as interactions with Internet sources (Miller & Bartlett, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miller & Bartlett, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
When students use ChatGPT to generate complete assignments, rather than for assistance such as suggesting revisions for their own critical review, they miss essential learning opportunities.
“For example, when students use ChatGPT to generate complete assignments, rather than for assistance such as suggesting revisions for their own critical review, they miss essential learning opportunities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Generative AI use is linked to shallower processing and diminished learning outcomes in studies on students using ChatGPT for constructive learning tasks such as information search and writing.
“This has been observed in studies on students using ChatGPT for constructive learning tasks (e.g., information search and writing), where generative AI use is linked to shallower processing and diminished learning outcomes (Fan et al., 2024;Stadler et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fan et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stadler et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lower perceived social presence is a challenge when comparing videos of AI-generated agents to filmed human instructors.
“However, challenges remain, including lower perceived social presence when comparing videos of AI-generated agents to filmed human instructors (Netland et al., 2025;Xu et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Netland et al., 2025
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xu et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
AI offers the advantage of enabling generation of quiz questions and flashcards on demand, facilitating self-assessment and repeated practice.
“However, AI offers the advantage of enabling the generation of quiz questions and flashcards on demand, facilitating self-assessment and repeated practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Ensuring that AI-generated questions align with content of learning materials and maintain high-quality formulations can pose a challenge.
“Yet, ensuring that AIgenerated questions align with the content of the learning materials and maintain high-quality formulations can pose a challenge (Hutt & Hieb, 2024;May et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hutt & Hieb, 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites May et al., 2025
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Substitution may indirectly enhance cognitive outcomes if AI increases efficiency and optimizes learners' resource allocation.
“However, substitution may indirectly enhance cognitive outcomes if AI increases efficiency and optimizes learners' resource allocation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Replacing human actions with AI can be problematic if it leads to the loss of human skills critical for achieving high-quality outcomes, diminishing expertise previously acquired and maintained through regular practice.
“However, replacing human actions with AI can be problematic if it leads to the loss of human skills critical for achieving high-quality outcomes, diminishing expertise previously acquired and maintained through regular practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cognitive forcing functions that initiate human inputs, such as initial judgments, before AI outputs are generated can mitigate over-reliance on AI.
“One example is cognitive forcing functions that initiate human inputs, such as initial judgments, before AI outputs are generated (Buçinca et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buçinca et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In educational contexts, student-initiated over-reliance on AI tools can undermine the development of skills such as critical thinking.
“Similarly, in educational contexts, student-initiated over-reliance on AI tools can undermine the development of skills such as critical thinking (Zhai et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhai et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A major concern associated with inadequate use or implementation of AI in learning contexts is its potential to undermine the acquisition of knowledge and skills.
“A major concern associated with an inadequate use or implementation of AI in learning contexts is its potential to undermine the acquisition of knowledge and skills (Huber et al., 2024;Kasneci et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Huber et al., 2024 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kasneci et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI-enhanced question-answering through conversational agents can provide instant responses to students' clarification questions in and outside class that would otherwise be answered by a teacher during class.
“Additionally, AI-enhanced question-answering through conversational agents can provide instant responses to students' clarification questions in-and outside of class that would otherwise be answered by a teacher during class (Almadhoob et al., 2024;Hicke et al., 2023;Nazar et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Almadhoob et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hicke et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nazar et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI-generated quiz questions and flashcards can substitute teacher-created quizzes or those from textbooks while maintaining instructional equivalence.
“Besides videos and podcasts for content presentation, AI-generated quiz questions and flashcards can substitute teacher-created quizzes or those from textbooks while maintaining instructional equivalence (Almadhoob et al., 2024;Bachiri et al., 2023;Hutt & Hieb, 2024;May et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Almadhoob et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bachiri et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hutt & Hieb, 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Studies often focus on subjective variables like satisfaction or self-assessments of learning to make claims about the usefulness of new AI approaches, neglecting actual learning processes and outcomes.
“Concerning the target variables and measurements, studies often focus on subjective variables like satisfaction or self-assessments of learning to make claims about the usefulness of the new AI-approaches, neglecting actual learning processes and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Meta-analyses comparing ITS with human tutoring or small-group instruction found no significant differences in cognitive learning effects.
“For example, meta-analyses comparing ITS with human tutoring or small-group instruction found no significant differences in cognitive learning effects (Ma et al., 2014;Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, 2014;VanLehn, 2011), suggesting that while ITS do not surpass human tutoring, they offer comparable conditions for achieving cognitive outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Simply introducing a new instructional medium does not improve learning outcomes if the instructional method remains unchanged.
“specifically the arguments from the media debate that simply introducing a new instructional medium does not improve learning outcomes if the instructional method remains unchanged (Clark, 1983(Clark, , 1994a(Clark, , 1994b)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Clark, 1983 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Clark, 1994a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Clark, 1994b
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
When a control group receives no instruction or additional support, findings reveal only that the AI intervention is better than doing nothing, offering limited insight into its instructional quality.
“However, when the control group receives no instruction or additional support, the findings reveal only that the AI intervention is better than doing nothing, offering limited insight into its instructional quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Suboptimal design or integration of AI-tools by educators or instructional designers can limit student engagement in key learning activities, thereby hindering skill development.
“Additionally, suboptimal design or integration of AI-tools by educators or instructional designers can limit student engagement in key learning activities, thereby hindering skill development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI-generated educational videos are a cost-efficient alternative.
“making AI-generated educational videos a cost-efficient alternative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Suboptimal use of AI tools during learning can lead to shallow learning processes despite instruction aimed at deep learning processes, resulting in an inversion of the intended goal of enhancing learning.
“Considering the overall evidence, suboptimal use of AI tools during learning can lead to shallow learning processes despite instruction aimed at deep learning processes, resulting in an inversion of the intended goal of enhancing learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Providing well understandable explanations with AI outputs can help users critically assess information.
“Additionally, providing well understandable explanations with AI outputs can help users to critically assess information (Vasconcelos et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vasconcelos et al., 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Demonstrating actual learning effects requires subsequent performance or knowledge improvements that persist without AI support.
“This would require demonstrating subsequent performance or knowledge improvements that persist without AI support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AI-generated videos lead to cognitive learning outcomes comparable to using teacher recordings and teacher-generated video instruction.
“Research suggests that AI-generated videos lead to cognitive learning outcomes that are comparable to using teacher recordings and teacher-generated video instruction (Leiker et al., 2023;Netland et al., 2025;Xu et al., 2024), making AI-generated educational videos a cost-efficient alternative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Leiker et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Netland et al., 2025
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xu et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
All support options (ChatGPT, human expert chat, writing analytics tools, no support) increased students' engagement in elaboration, organization, and orientation processes during revisions.
“An analysis of students' self-regulated learning behavior indicated that all support options increased students' engagement in elaboration, organization, and orientation processes during their revisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fan et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Meta-analyses comparing ITS to active and passive instructional methods found small to medium benefits for constructive learning with ITS.
“Meta-analyses comparing ITS to active and passive instructional methods (e.g., teacher-centered instruction, text reading) found small to medium benefits for constructive learning with ITS (Ma et al., 2014;Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ma et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Scaffolding can target various aspects of cognitive learning processes, such as activation of domain-knowledge and application of skills, such as collaboration and self-regulation.
“Scaffolding can target various aspects of cognitive learning processes, such as the activation of domain-knowledge (Sommerhoff et al., 2023) and the application of skills, such as collaboration (Vogel et al., 2017) and self-regulation (Azevedo et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sommerhoff et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vogel et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Azevedo et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
AI systems can augment teacher feedback by providing real-time data analytics and visualizations of student performance, exemplified by teacher dashboards.
“AI systems can augment teacher feedback by providing real-time data analytics and visualizations of student performance, exemplified by teacher dashboards that facilitate monitoring and assessment through visualizing relevant learner variables (Knoop-van Campen et al., 2023;Xhakaj et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Knoop-van Campen et al., 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xhakaj et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Natural language processing techniques analyze written responses to provide personalized cognitive support for improving skills, such as argumentation.
“Natural language processing techniques analyze written responses to provide personalized cognitive support for improving skills, such as argumentation (Butterfuss et al., 2022;Zhu et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Butterfuss et al., 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhu et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Learners can benefit from visual feedback tools, such as student-facing dashboards, which facilitate self-assessment by providing real-time overviews of individual or collaborative learning activities and outcomes.
“Likewise, learners can benefit from visual feedback tools, such as student-facing dashboards, which facilitate students' self-assessment by providing real-time overviews of individual or collaborative learning activities and outcomes (Breideband et al., 2023;Jivet et al., 2017;Long & Aleven, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Breideband et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jivet et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Long & Aleven, 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For cognitive learning outcomes, elaborate instructional feedback providing detailed guidance on task processing and self-regulation was found to be particularly helpful.
“For cognitive learning outcomes, elaborate instructional feedback providing detailed guidance on task processing and self-regulation was found to be particularly helpful (Wisniewski et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wisniewski et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Meta-analyses show that scaffolding enhances cognitive outcomes in digital learning environments.
“Meta-analyses show that scaffolding enhances cognitive outcomes in digital learning environments (Belland et al., 2017;Chernikova et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Belland et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chernikova et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Teacher characteristics, such as AI literacy, play a crucial role in ensuring effective teacher-AI collaboration.
“Therefore, teacher characteristics, such as AI literacy, play a crucial role in ensuring effective teacher-AI collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Computer-generated animated agents can use non-verbal facial cues, paralinguistic cues, and gestures as an additional form of feedback.
“Further, computer-generated animated agents can use non-verbal facial cues, paralinguistic cues (e.g., intonation in speech), and gestures as an additional form of feedback (Johnson & Lester, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson & Lester, 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Social interactions are fundamental to learning and development.
“which are fundamental to learning and development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When using generative AI to enhance content representation and practice tasks, common challenges include output accuracy, content alignment, and pedagogical quality.
“When using generative AI to enhance content representation and practice tasks, common challenges include output accuracy, content alignment, and pedagogical quality, which are discussed as crucial across all applications (Hicke et al., 2023;Hutt & Hieb, 2024;Leiker et al., 2023;May et al., 2025;Nazar et al., 2024;Netland et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hicke et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hutt & Hieb, 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leiker et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Analytic AI systems evaluate performance through data-driven insights, identifying patterns and discrepancies to provide consistent predefined feedback and scaffolds.
“Analytic AI systems evaluate performance through data-driven insights, identifying patterns and discrepancies to provide consistent predefined feedback and scaffolds (e.g., Bauer et al., 2025;D'Mello et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bauer et al., 2025
Not checked in the free run.
- cites D'Mello et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reduced social presence is perceived when watching AI-generated videos.
“This is underlined by findings, such as reduced social presence perceived when watching AI-generated videos (Xu et al., 2024)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Effective scaffolding adapts to learners' needs and fades out as they become more competent to promote autonomy and self-regulated learning.
“Effective scaffolding adapts to learners' needs and fades out as they become more competent to promote autonomy and self-regulated learning (Pea, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pea, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Students can benefit from constructive learning activities that involve interacting with generative AI, when these activities promote deep learning but would be impractical or too difficult to implement without AI.
“Furthermore, students can benefit from constructive learning activities that involve interacting with generative AI, when these activities promote deep learning but would be impractical or too difficult to implement without AI (e.g., a simulated conversation with a historic character).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AI technologies offer diverse approaches to implementing adaptive cognitive support.
“AI technologies offer diverse approaches to implementing adaptive cognitive support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Meta-analytic findings suggest that ITS are particularly effective when they are used to supplement human instruction.
“and meta-analytic findings suggesting that ITS are particularly effective when they are used to supplement human instruction (Sun et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Generative AI can support preparation and implementation of instructional approaches, such as problem-based learning, scenario-based learning, and game-based learning, enhancing cognitive engagement.
“Further, generative AI can support the preparation and implementation of instructional approaches, such as problem-based learning, scenario-based learning, and game-based learning, enhancing cognitive engagement (Huber et al., 2024;Kasneci et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Huber et al., 2024 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kasneci et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Overreliance on AI due to high trust can decrease critical reflection of AI outputs.
“As discussed earlier, overreliance on AI due to high trust can decrease critical reflection of AI outputs (Buçinca et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buçinca et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Institutional infrastructure, including reliable Internet access, sufficient hardware, and technical support, is crucial for seamless technology integration in educational settings.
“Institutional infrastructure, including reliable Internet access, sufficient hardware, and technical support, is crucial for seamless technology integration in educational settings (Liu et al., 2020;Sailer et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sailer et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI systems, especially non-educational applications used in education, can face challenges in aligning with other learning principles.
“However, while affording naturalistic interactivity, these AI systems, especially in the case of non-educational applications used in education (e.g., ChatGPT), can face challenges in aligning with other learning principles (see NASEM, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NASEM, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Generative AI can assist learners in creating text elements, visuals, or code, for example, to design games and other creative outputs.
“Generative AI can assist learners in creating text elements, visuals, or code, for example, to design games and other creative outputs (Huber et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huber et al., 2024 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Contextual factors such as opportunities for teacher professional development, institutional infrastructure, access to technology, and regulations may be critical for implementing AI-enhanced learning.
“Contextual factors such as opportunities for teacher professional development, institutional infrastructure, access to technology, and regulations may be critical for implementing AI-enhanced learning (Sailer et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sailer et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Learning-by-design fosters domain-specific knowledge and transversal skills, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, and collaboration.
“This approach fosters domain-specific knowledge and transversal skills, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, and collaboration (Kolodner et al., 2003a;Kolodner et al., 2003b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kolodner et al., 2003a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kolodner et al., 2003b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Students' and teachers' motivation and beliefs may significantly impact effective AI-enhanced learning.
“Additionally, students' and teachers' motivation and beliefs may significantly impact effective AI-enhanced learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Especially in absence of suitable human interaction partners, interactive learning activities can be facilitated through generative AI that uses chat-based interfaces.
“Especially in the absence of suitable human interaction partners, interactive learning activities can be facilitated through generative AI that uses chat-based interfaces (e.g., ChatGPT).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
High-quality cognitive support, such as feedback, depends on detailed information about learning content and suitable pedagogical approaches that may not be available without targeted system design.
“Additionally, high-quality cognitive support, such as feedback, depends on detailed information about the learning content and suitable pedagogical approaches that may not be available without targeted system design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Prerequisites for both students and teachers include their knowledge and skills specific to the learning content and transversal skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving.
“Prerequisites for both students and teachers include their knowledge and skills specific to the learning content and transversal skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving (Greiff et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greiff et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Low trust and technology-acceptance may prevent students and teachers from benefiting from the opportunities of AI enhancement.
“Conversely, low trust and technology-acceptance (including perceived usefulness and ease-of-use) may prevent students and teachers from benefiting from the opportunities of AI enhancement (Fütterer, Scherer et al., 2023;Viberg et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fütterer, Scherer et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Viberg et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For teachers, technological pedagogical content knowledge and technology-related teaching skills are essential for effectively integrating AI tools into diverse learning scenarios and teaching situations.
“For teachers, technological pedagogical content knowledge and technology-related teaching skills are essential for effectively integrating AI tools into diverse learning scenarios and teaching situations (Lachner et al., 2024;Mishra et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lachner et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mishra et al., 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Interactive learning activities involving communication enable deep learning and skill development through collaborative knowledge construction.
“Interactive learning activities involving communication enable deep learning and skill development through collaborative knowledge construction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Meta-analyses show medium-to large-sized positive effects of learning-by-design on student achievement in K-12 STEM education.
“Meta-analyses show medium-to large-sized positive effects on student achievement in K-12 STEM education (Delen & Sen, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Delen & Sen, 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 57
- May combine two claims. 38
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI literacy is becoming an increasingly important transversal skill for learners.
“Additionally, AI literacy is becoming an increasingly important transversal skill for learners (Ng et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ng et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe current publication boom in AI-enhanced education partly reflects a tendency to overhype recent developments, driven by neglect of previous theoretical and empirical insights about instructional mechanisms and learning, the framing of arguments, and study methods.
“In this article, however, we argue that the current publication boom partly reflects a tendency to overhype recent developments, driven by a neglect of previous theoretical and empirical insights about instructional mechanisms and learning, the way arguments are framed, and the study methods used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs provide outputs that can be misleading, biased, or incorrect.
“Especially AI systems that analyze and generate language using algorithms trained on large datasets, such as LLMs, provide outputs that can be misleading, biased, or incorrect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping human knowledge and skills remains crucial for tasks requiring deep understanding, ethical considerations, and creative problem-solving, which cannot be entirely outsourced to AI.
“However, developing human knowledge and skills remains crucial, especially for tasks requiring deep understanding, ethical considerations, and creative problem-solving, which cannot be entirely outsourced to AI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe probabilistic nature of LLMs implies they generate responses based on likelihood, not verified information, leading to plausible sounding but sometimes incorrect statements.
“In addition, the probabilistic nature of LLMs implies they generate responses based on likelihood, not verified information, leading to plausible sounding but sometimes incorrect statements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenResearch on AI-enhanced learning should integrate theoretical, empirical, and methodological insights from prior research on the learning effects of digital technologies, including AIED.
“As this research evolves, it is crucial to integrate theoretical, empirical, and methodological insights from prior research on the learning effects of digital technologies, including AIED.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWith advancements in AI, especially generative AI, an increasing range of tasks can be outsourced to AI systems.
“With advancements in AI, especially generative AI, an increasing range of tasks can be outsourced to AI systems (e.g., many well-defined data analysis tasks), challenging educational systems and their targeted objectives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI holds significant potential for enhancing student learning.
“Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing student learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenResearch on AI-enhanced learning should prioritize cognitive learning processes and outcomes to maximize AI's potential for effective learning.
“This paper argues that research on AI-enhanced learning should prioritize cognitive learning processes and outcomes to maximize AI's potential for effective learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNew research trends on AI-enhanced learning depart from traditional AIED research, which focused on systematically establishing insights on instructional effectiveness with rigorous research methods.
“These new research trends depart from the traditional AIED research, which has focused on systematically establishing insights on instructional effectiveness with rigorous research methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationEffectively teaching knowledge and skills and preparing individuals for complex real-world problem-solving requires engaging them in relevant cognitive learning activities.
“Effectively teaching knowledge and skills and preparing individuals for complex real-world problem-solving requires engaging them in relevant cognitive learning activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSimilar outcomes could potentially occur with educational AI systems that either relieve students of essential learning processes or allow them to outsource critical learning processes.
“While the studies of Stadler et al. (2024) and Fan et al. (2024) investigate a non-educational generative AI system in educational settings, similar outcomes could potentially occur with educational AI systems that either relieve students of essential learning processes or allow them to outsource critical learning processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Stadler et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fan et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHybrid intelligence approaches support continuous learning and upskilling, ensuring humans maintain and develop skills through human-AI collaboration.
“Such hybrid intelligence approaches were suggested to support continuous learning and upskilling, ensuring humans maintain and develop skills through human-AI collaboration (Järvelä et al., 2023;Rafner et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Järvelä et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rafner et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOver-reliance on algorithms may weaken decision-making and judgment skills, resulting in poor choices when AI support is unavailable.
“Over-reliance on algorithms may weaken decision-making and judgment skills, resulting in poor choices when AI support is unavailable (Sutton et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sutton et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ChatGPT group showed improved task performance during the supported intervention phase compared to other groups, but no differences in posttest knowledge gain or transfer.
“However, while the ChatGPT group, compared to the other groups, showed improved task performance during the supported intervention phase, there were no differences in the posttest knowledge gain or knowledge transfer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fan et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCurrent publications on AI for learning often focus primarily on the potential advantages of these technologies.
“While a balanced view on the potential of AI, particularly LLMs and generative AI, for learning is necessary, current publications often focus primarily on the potential advantages of these technologies for learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningPerformance during an AI-supported intervention phase can suggest initial learning benefits but cannot be considered sufficient evidence for actual learning effects.
“However, although performance during a supported intervention phase can suggest initial learning benefits, it cannot be considered as sufficient evidence for actual learning effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Stadler et al. (2024), ChatGPT simplified task processing by reducing task-irrelevant extraneous load and load intrinsic to the learning task, but did not improve learning effectiveness and was accompanied by reduced cognitive processing depth and reduced cognitive learning outcomes.
“The findings indicated that ChatGPT simplified task processing by reducing task-irrelevant extraneous load and load that is intrinsic to the learning task (see Sweller 2010); however, this did not improve learning effectiveness, but was accompanied by reduced cognitive processing depth (germane load; see Sweller 2010) and reduced cognitive learning outcomes, as indicated by students' quality of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stadler et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationLenient inclusion criteria in research syntheses can lead to a 'garbage in, garbage out' problem unless strict methodological and conceptual inclusion criteria are applied.
“This dynamic can easily lead to a “garbage in, garbage out” problem unless strict methodological and conceptual inclusion criteria are applied during study selection (Borenstein et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Borenstein et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe effectiveness of AI is contingent upon the quality of the instruction provided.
“Nonetheless, it is crucial to be explicit about what conclusions can and cannot be drawn from each study to prevent overhyping the capabilities of the technology itself, considering that its effectiveness is contingent upon the quality of the instruction provided.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe ISAR model distinguishes four types of effects in AI-enhanced learning: inversion, substitution, augmentation, and redefinition.
“To offer an explicit terminology for the AI enhancement debate, classify possible implementations, and define different research directions, we suggest distinguishing four types of effects in the context of AI-enhanced learning: inversion effects, substitution effects, augmentation effects, and redefinition effects of AI in educational contexts, summarized in the ISAR model shown in Fig. 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ChatGPT group relied strongly on AI support and showed relatively low metacognitive processing compared to other support groups.
“A temporal process analysis of learners' metacognitive activities suggested that the ChatGPT group relied strongly on the AI support and showed relatively low metacognitive processing compared to the other support groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fan et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTo effectively enhance learning of knowledge and skills, especially transversal skills, educators need to initiate deep learning processes in students.
“To effectively enhance the learning of both knowledge and skills, especially transversal skills crucial for the twenty-first century, educators need to initiate deep learning processes in their students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSyntheses exclusively focusing on LLMs and generative AI usage are currently constrained by the limited number of available studies, which may lead some to apply lenient inclusion criteria.
“However, syntheses that exclusively focus on LLMs and generative AI usage are currently still rather constrained by the limited number of available studies, which may be the reason why some syntheses and meta-analyses with this specific focus apply rather lenient inclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductreasoningWithout careful differentiation, meta-analyses risk an 'apples and oranges' issue, where studies with varying interventions and comparison conditions are mixed together to make broad claims about AI effectiveness.
“Without careful differentiation, meta-analyses risk an “apples and oranges” issue, where studies with varying interventions and comparison conditions are mixed together to make broad claims about AI effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMany recent primary studies and research syntheses have faced criticism for methodological issues that compromise the interpretability and validity of their findings.
“Indeed, many recent primary studies and research syntheses have faced criticism for methodological issues that compromise the interpretability and validity of their findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenSubstitution effects in AI-enhanced learning occur when AI provides instructional equivalence to non-AI alternatives without changing learners' cognitive processing depth and, therefore, without directly changing learning outcomes.
“Substitution effects in AI-enhanced learning occur when AI provides instructional equivalence to non-AI alternatives without changing learners' cognitive processing depth and, therefore, without directly changing learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLearners may redirect spared resources toward more intensive practice or additional learning activities, though the extent depends on individual factors such as motivation and self-regulation.
“In such cases, learners may redirect their spared resources toward more intensive practice or additional learning activities, though the extent of such benefits likely depends on individual factors such as motivation and self-regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenAugmentation effects occur when AI enhances instruction by providing additional cognitive learning support compared to a non-AI alternative.
“Augmentation effects occur when AI enhances instruction by providing additional cognitive learning support compared to a non-AI alternative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMany studies fail to adequately acknowledge their limitations, thereby contributing to the hype about AI's effects on learning.
“Despite many examples of rigorous research, there are also many studies that fail to adequately acknowledge their limitations (a problem we will elaborate on below), thereby contributing to the hype about AI's effects on learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTechnology in education has a dual role: instrumental, emphasizing that positive learning effects should be attributed to instruction rather than technology itself; and transformative, highlighting the potential to afford known and new possibilities for enhanced instruction.
“While these perspectives differ, together they underscore the dual role of technology in education: instrumental, emphasizing that any positive learning effects should be attributed to the instruction rather than the technology itself; and transformative, highlighting the potential to afford known and new possibilities for enhanced instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationInversion effects in AI-enhanced learning occur when AI, intended to support deep learning, instead leads to reduced cognitive processing and learning outcomes, counteracting its intended benefits.
“Inversion effects in AI-enhanced learning occur when AI, intended to support deep learning, instead leads to reduced cognitive processing and learning outcomes, counteracting its intended benefits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses found medium to large learning benefits for ITS compared to self-reliant learning without support, and small to medium gains when comparing ITS to nonadaptive or less adaptive computer-assisted learning.
“For example, meta-analyses found medium to large learning benefits for ITS, which provide feedback and targeted hints, compared to self-reliant learning without support, and small to medium gains when comparing ITS to nonadaptive or less adaptive computer-assisted learning (Ma et al., 2014;Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ma et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationRedefinition effects occur when AI transforms learning tasks to foster deeper (constructive or interactive) learning, provided that the non-AI comparison condition does not already support deep learning processes.
“Redefinition effects occur when AI transforms learning tasks to foster deeper (constructive or interactive) learning, provided that the non-AI comparison condition does not already support deep learning processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationScaffolding can adjust task difficulty and task sequencing, thereby creating personalized learning paths, which is often employed by ITS systems but also considered beneficial in other contexts, such as simulation-based learning.
“Additionally, scaffolding can adjust task difficulty and task sequencing, thereby creating personalized learning paths, which is a technique that is often employed by ITS systems but also considered beneficial in other contexts, such as simulation-based learning (Fischer et al., 2022;Holstein et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fischer et al., 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Holstein et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTeachers can use a write-curate-verify approach for generating materials, by writing prompts, curating output, and verifying output, which keeps human in the loop to ensure high-quality results.
“Teachers can use a write-curate-verify approach for generating materials, by writing the prompts, curating the output, and verifying the output, which keeps the human in the loop to ensure high-quality results (Bai et al., 2024;Ninaus & Sailer, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ninaus & Sailer, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNatural language processing combined with speech synthesis can analyze and generate spoken language, though this process may still experience time lags compared to text-based communication.
“Additionally, natural language processing techniques, combined with speech synthesis, can analyze and generate spoken language (e.g., in computer-generated animated agents; Fink et al., 2024), though this process may still experience time lags compared to text-based communication (Dekel et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fink et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dekel et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenKey affordances of AI in education lie in implementing these instructional approaches more intensively than is currently done in many educational contexts.
“However, because key affordances of AI in education lie in implementing these instructional approaches more intensively than is currently done in many educational contexts, the following sections discuss these approaches from the perspectives of augmentation (AIenhanced cognitive support) and redefinition (AI-enhanced learning activities for deep learning).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTeacher oversight can be needed, keeping the human in the loop, to actively monitor AI-generated content and ensure that AI outputs remain accurate, relevant, and pedagogically sound in educational settings.
“Also, teacher oversight can be needed, keeping the human in the loop, to actively monitor AI-generated content and ensure that AI outputs remain accurate, relevant, and pedagogically sound in educational settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLike students, teachers may also be at risk of overrelying on AI outputs and adopting them uncritically, particularly if they have limited awareness of AI's potential pitfalls.
“However, like students, teachers may also be at risk of overrelying on AI outputs and adopting them uncritically, particularly if they have limited awareness of AI's potential pitfalls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAI technologies can enhance cognitive support by providing additional feedback and scaffolding that optimize cognitive processing of various learning activities.
“Specifically, AI technologies can enhance cognitive support by providing additional feedback and scaffolding that optimize cognitive processing of various learning activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe validity and accuracy of AI-enhanced cognitive support are crucial for its effectiveness, as low-quality cognitive support can lead to learner disengagement, ultimately hindering the intended augmentation.
“The validity and accuracy of AI-enhanced cognitive support are crucial for its effectiveness, as low-quality cognitive support can lead to learner disengagement, ultimately hindering the intended augmentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSuch issues might be mitigated by focusing on educational AI tools with built-in quality assurance mechanisms that ensure AI-generated materials adhere to course content.
“Such issues might be mitigated by focusing on educational AI tools with built-in quality assurance mechanisms that ensure, for example, that AIgenerated materials adhere to the course content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAI-based feedback can be complemented by AI-enhanced peer feedback as a scalable alternative to AI-enhanced teacher feedback; however, even with AI support, quality of peer feedback processes and outcomes may still vary.
“To keep the human in the loop and respond to concerns about dehumanizing learning through replacing human interaction, AIbased feedback can be complemented by AI-enhanced peer feedback as a scalable alternative to AI-enhanced teacher feedback; however, even with AI support, the quality of peer feedback processes and outcomes may still vary (Banihashem et al., 2024;Bauer et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Banihashem et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bauer et al., 2023 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLog data analysis identifies student behavior patterns, enabling timely interventions.
“Log data analysis identifies student behavior patterns, enabling timely interventions (Lim et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lim et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEffective feedback significantly impacts learning outcomes by offering insights into task performance, facilitating self-assessment, and guiding future efforts.
“Effective feedback significantly impacts learning outcomes by offering insights into task performance, facilitating self-assessment, and guiding future efforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hattie & Timperley, 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEffectiveness of both teacher- and student-facing dashboards depends on dashboard usability and audience characteristics, as designing dashboards that provide accessible, relevant, and actionable information can be challenging, and users may struggle to translate insights into meaningful actions because of their knowledge and skills.
“However, the effectiveness of both teacher-and student-facing dashboards depends on the dashboard usability and audience characteristics, as designing dashboards that provide accessible, relevant, and actionable information can be challenging, and users may struggle to translate insights into meaningful actions because of their knowledge and skills (Jivet et al., 2017;Matcha et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jivet et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Matcha et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile adequate prompting determines immediate output quality, fine-tuning with domain-specific data can further enhance alignment with domain knowledge, instructional accuracy, and educational needs.
“While adequate prompting determines the immediate output quality, fine-tuning with domainspecific data can further enhance alignment with domain knowledge, instructional accuracy, and educational needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA straightforward option for generative AI to enhance deep learning activities in education is by assisting teachers with planning instructional approaches that afford deep learning processes.
“A straightforward option for generative AI to enhance deep learning activities in education is by assisting teachers with planning instructional approaches that afford deep learning processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis offers advantages in accessibility and immediacy of answers while alleviating teacher workload, especially in educational contexts with many students.
“This offers advantages in the accessibility and immediacy of answers while alleviating teacher workload, especially in educational contexts with many students (e.g., lectures in higher education).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe most transformative potential of AI in education may lie in redefinition effects, where AI is used to redesign learning tasks in ways that encourage students to engage in deep rather than shallow learning processes.
“The most transformative potential of AI in education may lie in redefinition effects, where AI is used to redesign learning tasks in ways that encourage students to engage in deep (constructive or interactive) rather than shallow (passive or active) learning processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSpecialized interfaces that enhance output explainability and promote teachers' critical reflection and revision of AI-generated content might help mitigate these issues.
“Specialized interfaces that enhance output explainability (e.g., through annotations) and promote teachers' critical reflection and revision of AI-generated content might help mitigate these issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInstructional materials such as interactive simulations can be generated with the help of AI and allow students' knowledge construction through exploration of complex concepts.
“Instructional materials such as interactive simulations can be generated with the help of AI (Bewersdorff et al., 2025) and allow students' knowledge construction through the exploration of complex concepts (Kali & Linn, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bewersdorff et al., 2025
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kali & Linn, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRule-based systems deliver feedback and scaffolding based on predefined rules but lack flexibility, while machine learning and deep learning systems offer personalized feedback by analyzing complex data patterns.
“Rule-based systems deliver feedback and scaffolding based on predefined rules but lack flexibility, while machine learning and deep learning systems offer personalized feedback by analyzing complex data patterns (Sailer et al., 2024b;Zapata-Rivera & Arslan, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sailer et al., 2024b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zapata-Rivera & Arslan, 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn digital learning environments, AI can enhance the quality of feedback and scaffolding compared to nonadaptive or less adaptive technology-driven cognitive support.
“Additionally, in digital learning environments, AI can enhance the quality of feedback and scaffolding compared to nonadaptive or less adaptive technology-driven cognitive support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent scaffolds are most effective for different learners; for example, worked examples may not be as beneficial to high-knowledge learners as reflection phases.
“Moreover, different scaffolds are most effective for different learners; for example, worked examples may not be as beneficial to high-knowledge learners as reflection phases (Chernikova et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chernikova et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGenerative AI creates personalized feedback and scaffolds based on interactions and performance data, enabling dynamic support systems; however, these systems may lack explainability and, if not designed in agreement with instructional principles, may also generate content that varies in accuracy, specificity, and pedagogical quality.
“Generative AI creates personalized feedback and scaffolds based on interactions and performance data, enabling dynamic support systems; however, these systems may lack explainability and, if not designed in agreement with instructional principles, may also generate content that varies in accuracy, specificity, and pedagogical quality (Banihashem et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Banihashem et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenUsing such constructive tasks may increase learner motivation, which could potentially help mitigate inversion effects.
“Using such constructive tasks may increase learner motivation, which could potentially help mitigate inversion effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKnowledge and skills related to digital technologies, including AI literacy, are crucial for raising awareness about problems such as biases in training data and outputs.
“Especially knowledge and skills related to digital technologies, including AI literacy, are crucial for raising awareness about problems such as biases in training data and outputs (Ng et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ng et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRuffle & Riley system employs AutoTutor's Expectation Misconception Tailoring as a tutoring model to structure dialogues and address student misconceptions.
“Similarly, the Ruffle & Riley system (Schmucker et al., 2024), a trialoguebased tutoring platform, employs AutoTutor's Expectation Misconception Tailoring as a tutoring model to structure dialogues and address student misconceptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmucker et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn addition to a chat-based user interface, further key components include a learner model tracking students' knowledge and misconceptions, a domain model representing relevant subject information, and a tutoring model determining instructional strategies.
“However, in addition to a (chat-based) user interface, further key components include a learner model tracking students' knowledge and misconceptions, a domain model representing relevant subject information, and a tutoring model determining instructional strategies (D'Mello & Graesser, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites D'Mello & Graesser, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUser-friendly, ethical, and regulation-compliant AI applications may facilitate the effective use of AI in education.
“Lastly, user-friendly, ethical, and regulation-compliant AI applications may facilitate the effective use of AI in education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAlthough it lacks a traditional domain model and learner model, limiting content quality assurance and tracking of learners' task mastery, the Socratic Playground for Learning uses a Socratic tutoring model to foster critical thinking and reflection by iteratively posing questions and guiding learners.
“Although it lacks a traditional domain model and learner model, limiting content quality assurance and tracking of learners' task mastery, the Socratic Playground for Learning uses a Socratic tutoring model to foster critical thinking and reflection by iteratively posing questions and guiding learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThese skills may influence the quality of interactions with AI systems, such as effective prompt-writing and assessing AI outputs.
“These skills may influence the quality of interactions with AI systems, such as effective prompt-writing and assessing AI outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenRecent ITS developments increasingly use LLMs for enhanced interactivity.
“Recent ITS developments increasingly use LLMs for enhanced interactivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSocratic Playground for Learning uses GPT-4 with assisted prompt engineering for multi-turn dialogues.
“For example, the Socratic Playground for Learning (Zhang et al., 2024) uses GPT-4 with assisted prompt engineering for multi-turn dialogues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSuccessful AI integration in education additionally requires that students and teachers have the necessary knowledge, skills, and motivation to interact effectively with AI systems.
“However, successful AI integration in education additionally requires that students and teachers have the necessary knowledge, skills, and motivation to interact effectively with AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUnderstanding the opportunities and limitations of AI-enhanced learning in any educational context requires a holistic perspective on the various conditions necessary for effective and sustainable AI integration in education.
“In conclusion, understanding the opportunities and limitations of AIenhanced learning in any educational context requires a holistic perspective on the various conditions necessary for effective and sustainable AI integration in education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis access is vital to avoid amplifying the digital divide within and across countries.
“This access is vital to avoid amplifying the digital divide within and across countries (UNESCO, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UNESCO, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA common form of conversational ITS involves dialogue-based interactions with a simulated tutor.
“A common form of conversational ITS involves dialogue-based interactions with a simulated tutor (e.g., AutoTutor; Graesser, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Graesser, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a trialogue, the student can be the tutor, explaining content to a simulated tutee with optional help from a simulated teacher.
“Alternatively, in a trialogue, the student can be the tutor, explaining content to a simulated tutee with optional help from a simulated teacher (Graesser et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Graesser et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIndividual access to technology is essential for both teachers and students, ensuring they have the necessary devices and resources to engage with AI tools.
“Individual access to technology is essential for both teachers and students, ensuring they have the necessary devices and resources to engage with AI tools (Crompton, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crompton, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPolitical and institutional regulations governing the ethical use of AI, data privacy, and security are necessary to protect all parties and may provide a structured approach to integrating AI in education.
“Political and institutional regulations governing the ethical use of AI, data privacy, and security are necessary to protect all parties and may provide a structured approach to integrating AI in education (Liu et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLearning-by-design engages students in iterative cycles of designing, building, testing, and reflecting to deepen their learning.
“For example, learning-by-design engages students in iterative cycles of designing, building, testing, and reflecting to deepen their learning (Kolodner et al., 2003a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kolodner et al., 2003a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese examples illustrate how LLMs can be integrated with ITS components and pedagogical principles, but also highlight challenges in balancing flexibility, content quality, pedagogical quality, and personalized instruction.
“These examples illustrate how LLMs can be integrated with ITS components and pedagogical principles, but also highlight challenges in balancing flexibility, content quality, pedagogical quality, and personalized instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationConstructive learning activities, where students actively generate formative outputs, foster deep understanding and skill development and can, in some cases, be enhanced by generative AI.
“Constructive learning activities, where students actively generate formative outputs, foster deep understanding and skill development and can, in some cases, be enhanced by generative AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRobust digital infrastructure, equitable access to technology, and supportive policies are crucial for seamless implementation.
“Robust digital infrastructure, equitable access to technology, and supportive policies are crucial for seamless implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInstead of using a traditional domain model, Ruffle & Riley generates tutoring workflows from existing content and relies on chat logs and real-time responses rather than building a comprehensive learner model.
“Instead of using a traditional domain model, it generates tutoring workflows from existing content and relies on chat logs and real-time responses rather than building a comprehensive learner model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmucker et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese factors are comparable to those influencing the integration of other digital technologies in education, but may partially be further specified for the context of AI.
“These factors are comparable to those influencing the integration of other digital technologies in education (Lachner et al., 2024;Sailer et al., 2021), which we will summarize below, but may partially be further specified for the context of AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lachner et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sailer et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch showed that technology-driven natural language interactions can foster deep conceptual learning by requiring explanation and reflection, and help develop essential communication skills.
“This research showed that technology-driven natural language interactions can foster deep conceptual learning by requiring explanation and reflection, and help develop essential communication skills (Rus et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rus et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOngoing professional development may ensure that teachers remain updated with the latest AI advancements and are equipped to integrate these tools effectively into their teaching practices.
“Ongoing professional development may ensure that teachers remain updated with the latest AI advancements and are equipped to integrate these tools effectively into their teaching practices (Lindner et al., 2019;Williams et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lindner et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Williams et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInclusive education can be facilitated through institutional access to technology, which is, however, also not a given.
“Inclusive education can be facilitated through institutional access to technology, which is, however, also not a given (Liu et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenNatural language-based learning systems represent a powerful approach to realizing potential redefinition effects through AI-enhanced learning activities for deep learning.
“Nevertheless, natural language-based learning systems represent a powerful approach to realizing potential redefinition effects through AI-enhanced learning activities for deep learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFlipped classroom approaches could be useful because constructive activities take place during class, which facilitates teacher interventions that guide students' use of AI, while passive knowledge transfer takes place outside of class time.
“Additionally, flipped classroom approaches could be useful because the constructive activities take place during class, which facilitates teacher interventions that guide students' use of AI, while passive knowledge transfer takes place outside of class time (Akçayır & Akçayır, 2018;Strelan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Akçayır & Akçayır, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Strelan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The greater the instructional enhancement relative to a comparison condition, the greater the transformative potential for enhanced cognitive learning processes and outcomes through the affordances offered by the AI system.
“The assumption underlying the substitution, augmentation, and redefinition effects in the ISAR model is that the greater the instructional enhancement relative to a comparison condition, the greater the transformative potential for enhanced cognitive learning processes and outcomes through the affordances offered by the AI system.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Leveraging AI for substitution of instructionally equivalent non-AI learning conditions does not inherently lead to greater learning gains.
“The assumption that leveraging AI for substitution of instructionally equivalent non-AI learning conditions does not inherently lead to greater learning gains aligns with long-standing debates in educational research”
The authors state this as an assumption.
When AI replaces specific instructional functions without altering the cognitive processes involved, the effectiveness of the AI-enhanced instruction remains comparable to non-AI instructional methods used for the same purpose in the same context.
“Similarly, we can assume that when AI replaces specific instructional functions without altering the cognitive processes involved, the effectiveness of the AI-enhanced instruction remains comparable to non-AI instructional methods used for the same purpose in the same context.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Metacognitive development requires explicit scaffolding rather than emerging naturally from AI interaction.
“Metacognitive development requires explicit scaffolding rather than emerging naturally from AI interaction (Bauer et al., 2025; Yin et al., 2025; Zhou et al., 2024).”
From Reimagining writing assessment for the AI era: a systematic review on balancing AI support and authentic skill growth (2026) · cites this paper as Bauer et al., 2025
In “Augmentation Effects Through AI-Enhanced Cognitive Support” (page unavailable), the paper says scaffolding can target self-regulation and that effective scaffolding promotes autonomy and self-regulated learning. In “Redefinition Effects Through AI-Enhanced Learning Activities for Deep Learning” (page unavailable), it cautions that chat-based AI may lack suitable pedagogical support without targeted design. These passages support a role for designed support, but do not establish that metacognitive development requires explicit scaffolding or cannot emerge from AI interaction. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExcessive reliance on AI for emotional navigation may result in cognitive disengagement correlating with reduced critical thinking.
“yet excessive reliance may result in cognitive disengagement correlating with reduced critical thinking [25].”
From Encountering Generative AI: Narrative Self-Formation and Technologies of the Self Among Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
The “Inversion Effects of AI Undermining Deep Learning” section (page not supplied) says student over-reliance on AI can undermine critical-thinking development and reports reduced cognitive processing depth in a learning task. It does not address reliance on AI for emotional navigation, so the claim's application to that context is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Fan et al. is cited for diminished learning outcomes despite no posttest difference
MinorThe paper cites Fan et al. (2024) as evidence that ChatGPT use is linked to diminished learning outcomes, but its later account of that study says the ChatGPT group did not differ from the other groups in posttest knowledge gain or transfer. The reported lower metacognitive processing does not resolve the discrepancy about learning outcomes.
“This has been observed in studies on students using ChatGPT for constructive learning tasks (e.g., information search and writing), where generative AI use is linked to shallower processing and diminished learning outcomes (Fan et al., 2024;Stadler et al., 2024).”
“However, while the ChatGPT group, compared to the other groups, showed improved task performance during the supported intervention phase, there were no differences in the posttest knowledge gain or knowledge transfer.”
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING <sup>*</sup>
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scaffolding is a second main type of cognitive support and facilitates learners’ processing of a learning task within their zone of proximal development, which is the zone of task difficulty where learners need guidance to succeed (Wood et al., 1976).”
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Further, generative AI can support the preparation and implementation of instructional approaches, such as problem-based learning, scenario-based learning, and game-based learning, enhancing cognitive engagement (Huber et al., 2024; Kasneci et al., 2023).”
Self-citationOn the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Instead, these models generate text by probabilistically predicting word sequences based on patterns in their training data, a process which has been compared to a “stochastic par-rot” (Bender et al., 2021).”
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715 · see citing works
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Especially knowledge and skills related to digital technologies, including AI literacy, are crucial for raising awareness about problems such as biases in training data and outputs (Ng et al., 2021).”
Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load
Sweller, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5 · Cited by 2,020 · see citing works
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923 · see citing works
Media will never influence learning
Clark, R. E. (1994) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299088 · Cited by 1,893 · see citing works
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7 · Cited by 1,567 · see citing works
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087 · Cited by 1,199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For cognitive learning outcomes, elaborate instructional feedback providing detailed guidance on task processing and self-regulation was found to be particularly helpful (Wisniewski et al., 2020).”
Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09692 · Cited by 1,124 · cited 2× · see citing works
“One example is cognitive forcing functions that initiate human inputs, such as initial judgments, before AI outputs are generated (Buçinca et al., 2021).”
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1204_2 · Cited by 1,061 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This approach fosters domain-specific knowledge and transversal skills, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, and collaboration (Kolodner et al., 2003a; Kolodner et al., 2003b).”
Grassini, S. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070692 · Cited by 1,048 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…ChatGPT’s launch in November 2022 includes numerous discussion papers on the general functionalities, opportunities, and challenges of increasingly powerful AI systems (e.g., Abd-Alrazaq et al., 2023; Alasadi & Baiz, 2023; Grassini, 2023; Kasneci et al., 2023; Rasul et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2024).”
Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis
Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037123 · Cited by 840 · cited 13× · see citing works
“These examples illustrate how LLMs can be integrated with ITS components and pedagogical principles, but also highlight challenges in balancing flexibility, content quality, pedagogical quality, and personalized instruction.”
InfluentialGuidance for generative AI in education and research
(2023) · doi:10.54675/ewzm9535 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13544 · Cited by 805 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This has been observed in studies on students using ChatGPT for constructive learning tasks (e.g., information search and writing), where generative AI use is linked to shallower processing and diminished learning outcomes (Fan et al., 2024; Stadler et al., 2024).”
InfluentialHelp Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543073003277 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Do <scp>AI</scp> chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis
Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13334 · Cited by 576 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing number of reviews and meta-analyses have begun to focus on synthesizing the primary studies on LLMs and generative AI applications (e.g., Deng et al., 2025; Wu & Yu, 2024).”
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning
Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5 · Cited by 499 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It encompasses an understanding of AI’s fundamental concepts, capabilities, implications, and ethical considerations, along with the skills required to interact with AI systems effectively and critically evaluate their outputs (Yan et al., 2024).”
Self-citationTPACK in the age of ChatGPT and Generative AI
Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Generative AI in Education and Research: Opportunities, Concerns, and Solutions
Alasadi, E. A., & Baiz, C. R. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00323 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making
Vasconcelos, H., Jörke, M., Grunde-McLaughlin, M., Gerstenberg, T., Bernstein, M. S., & Krishna, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579605 · Cited by 402 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, providing well understandable explanations with AI outputs can help users to critically assess information (Vasconcelos et al., 2023).”
Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models
Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. S., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae346 · Cited by 383 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, generated materials and other outputs may reflect cultural or gender biases (e.g., Kotek et al., 2023; Tao et al., 2024), and learners’ input language can lead to biased outputs, as LLMs may contain language and dialect prejudices (Hofmann et al., 2024).”
Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034752 · Cited by 355 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…found medium to large learning benefits for ITS, which provide feedback and targeted hints, compared to self-reliant learning without support, and small to medium gains when comparing ITS to non-adaptive or less adaptive computer-assisted learning (Ma et al., 2014; Steenbergen-Hu & Cooper, 2014).”
Synthesizing Results From Empirical Research on Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education
Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316670999 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Human and artificial intelligence collaboration for socially shared regulation in learning
Järvelä, S., Nguyen, A., & Hadwin, A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13325 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review
Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Socio-Cognitive Scaffolding with Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts: a Meta-Analysis
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108386 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies
Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Face-to-Face Interaction with Pedagogical Agents, Twenty Years Later
Johnson, W. L., & Lester, J. C. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0065-9 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations
Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H.-S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning
Lim, L., Bannert, M., van der Graaf, J., Singh, S., Fan, Y., Surendrannair, S., Rakovic, M., Molenaar, I., Moore, J., & Gašević, D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107547 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Bauer, E., Greisel, M., Kuznetsov, I., Berndt, M., Kollar, I., Dresel, M., Fischer, M. R., & Fischer, F. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13336 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationThe life cycle of large language models in education: A framework for understanding sources of bias
Lee, J., Hicke, Y., Yu, R., Brooks, C., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13505 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Collaborative Problem-Solving Education for the Twenty-First-Century Workforce
Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., & Greiff, S. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0363-y · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancing learning outcomes through self-regulated learning support with an Open Learner Model
Long, Y., & Aleven, V. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-016-9186-6 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Effect of design-based learning on improving computational thinking
Jun, S., Han, S., & Kim, S. (2016) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1188415 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Strategy Uptake in Writing Pal: Adaptive Feedback and Instruction
Butterfuss, R., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331211045304 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The Effects of ALEKS on Mathematics Learning in K-12 and Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis
Sun, S., Else-Quest, N. M., Hodges, L. C., French, A. M., & Dowling, R. (2021) · Investigations in Mathematics Learning · doi:10.1080/19477503.2021.1926194 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is underlined by findings, such as reduced social presence perceived when watching AI-generated videos (Xu et al., 2024) and meta-analytic findings suggesting that ITS are particularly effective when they are used to supplement human instruction (Sun et al., 2021).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- Abd-Alrazaq, A., AlSaad, R., Alhuwail, D., Ahmed, A., Healy, P. M., Latifi, S., ... & Sheikh, J. (2023). Large language models in medical education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e48291. https://doi.org/10.2196/48291 · DOI · Paper page
- Akata, Z., Balliet, D., de Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Grossi, D., Hindriks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M., Oliehoek, F., Prakken, H., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L., van Harmelen, F., … Welling, M. (2020). A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: Augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence. Computer, 53(8), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.2996587 · DOI · Paper page
- Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021 · DOI
- Almadhoob, A. H., Saleh, A. S. K., & Akbar, F. (2024). QuizWiz: Integrating generative artificial intelligence in an online study tool. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Big Data and Education (pp. 87–96). https://doi.org/10.1145/3704289.3704296 · DOI
- Anderson, J. R., Betts, S., Bothell, D., Hope, R., & Lebiere, C. (2019). Learning rapid and precise skills. Psychological review, 126(5), 727–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000152 · DOI
- Arastoopour, G., Shaffer, D. W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Chesler, N. C. (2016). Teaching and assessing engineering design thinking with virtual internships and epistemic network analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1492–1501. https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c320316B.html
- Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F., Duffy, M., Harley, J., Taub, M., Trevors, G., Cloude, E., Dever, D., Wiedbusch, M. D., Wortha, F., & Cerezo, R. (2022). Lessons learned and future directions of metatutor: Leveraging multichannel data to scaffold self-regulated learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 813632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813632 · DOI
- Bachiri, Y. A., Mouncif, H., spsampsps Bouikhalene, B. (2023). Optimizing learning outcomes and retention in MOOCs with AI-generated flashcards. In International Conference on Smart Learning Environments (pp. 242–247). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5961-7_32 · DOI
- Backfisch, I., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Teachers’ technology use for teaching: Comparing two explanatory mechanisms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103390 · DOI
- Bai, S., Gonda, D. E., & Hew, K. F. (2024). Write-curate-verify: A case study of leveraging generative AI for scenario writing in scenario-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3378306 · DOI
- Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback sources in essay writing: Peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Bauer, E., Sailer, M., Niklas, F., Greiff, S., Sarbu‐Rothsching, S., Zottmann, J. M., ... & Fischer, F. (2025). AI‐based adaptive feedback in simulations for teacher education: An experimental replication in the field. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), e13123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13123 · DOI
- Bewersdorff, A., Hartmann, C., Hornberger, M., Seßler, K., Bannert, M., Kasneci, E., ... & Nerdel, C. (2025). Taking the next step with generative artificial intelligence: The transformative role of multimodal large language models in science education. Learning and Individual Differences, 118, 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102601 · DOI
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386 · DOI · Paper page
- Breideband, T., Bush, J., Chandler, C., Chang, M., Dickler, R., Foltz, P., ... & D'Mello, S. (2023). The Community Builder (CoBi): Helping students to develop better small group collaborative learning skills. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 376–380). https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3607498 · DOI
- Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Fink, M. C., Timothy, V., Seidel, T., Fischer, F., & DFG Research group COSIMA. (2020). Facilitating diagnostic competences in higher education—A meta-analysis in medical and teacher education. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 157–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09492-2 · DOI
- Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · DOI · Paper page
- Clark, R. E. (1994b). Media and Method. Educational Technology and Development, 42, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298090 · DOI
- Crompton, H. (2017). Moving toward a mobile learning landscape: Presenting a mlearning integration framework. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0018 · DOI
- Crossley, S., Choi, J. S., Morris, W., Holmes, L., Joyner, D., & Gupta, V. (2024). Using intelligent texts in a computer science classroom: Findings from an iTELL deployment. In Y. Shi, P. Brusilovsky, B. Akram, T. Price, J. Leinonen, K. Koedinger, & A. Lan (Eds.). Proceedings of the educational data mining in computer science education workshop 2024 (pp. 11–19). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3796/CSEDM-24_paper_8293.pdf
- D’Mello, S. K., Duran, N., Michaels, A., & Stewart, A. E. (2024). Improving collaborative problem-solving skills via automated feedback and scaffolding: A quasi-experimental study with CPSCoach 2.0. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 34(4), 1087–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09387-6 · DOI · Paper page
- D’Mello, S. K., spsampsps Graesser, A. (2023). Intelligent tutoring systems: How computers achieve learning gains that rival human tutors. In Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 603–629). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433726 · DOI
- Dekel, A., Shechtman, S., Fernandez, R., Haws, D., Kons, Z., & Hoory, R. (2024). Speak while you think: Streaming speech synthesis during text generation. In ICASSP 2024–2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 11931–11935). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10446214 · DOI
- Delen, I., & Sen, S. (2023). Effect of design-based learning on achievement in K-12 education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 330–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21800 · DOI · Paper page
- Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224 · DOI · Paper page
- Du Boulay, B., Mitrovic, A., & Yacef, K. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook of artificial intelligence in education. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375413 · DOI
- Du, H., Jia, Q., Gehringer, E., & Wang, X. (2024). Harnessing large language models to auto-evaluate the student project reports. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100268 · DOI
- Fink, M. C., Robinson, S. A., & Ertl, B. (2024). AI-based avatars are changing the way we learn and teach: Benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1416307. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1416307 · DOI
- Fischer, F., Bauer, E., Seidel, T., Schmidmaier, R., Radkowitsch, A., Neuhaus, B. J., et al. (2022). Representational scaffolding in digital simulations—Learning professional practices in higher education. Information and Learning Sciences, 123(11/12), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2022-0076 · DOI
- Fütterer, T., Scherer, R., Scheiter, K., Stürmer, K., & Lachner, A. (2023). Will, skills, or conscientiousness: What predicts teachers’ intentions to participate in technology-related professional development?. Computers & Education, 198, 104756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104756 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghosh, S. (2024). Rehumanizing education in the age of technology. In Adarsh Garg, B V Babu, Valentina E. Balas (eds.) Advances in technological innovations in higher education: Theory and practices (pp. 1–15). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003376699 · DOI
- Graesser, A. C. (2015). Deeper learning with advances in discourse science and technology. Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600888 · DOI
- Graesser, A. C. (2016). Conversations with AutoTutor help students learn. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0086-4 · DOI
- Graesser, A. C., Forsyth, C. M., & Lehman, B. A. (2017). Two heads may be better than one: Learning from computer agents in conversational trialogues. Teachers College Record, 119(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900309 · DOI
- Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., Nye, B., & Sottilare, R. (2016). Intelligent tutoring systems, serious games, and the generalized intelligent framework for tutoring (GIFT). In H. F. O’Neil, E. L. Baker, and R. S. Perez (Eds.), Using games and simulation for teaching and assessment (pp. 58–79). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817767 · DOI
- Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031001104 · DOI · Paper page
- Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Csapó, B., Demetriou, A., Hautamäki, J., Graesser, A. C., & Martin, R. (2014). Domain-general problem solving skills and education in the 21st century. Educational Research Review, (13), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.10.002 · DOI
- Hicke, Y., Agarwal, A., Ma, Q., & Denny, P. (2023). AI-TA: Towards an intelligent question-answer teaching assistant using open-source LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02775. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.02775 · DOI
- Hicks, M. T., Humphries, J., & Slater, J. (2024). ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoff, T. (2011). Deskilling and adaptation among primary care physicians using two work innovations. Health Care Management Review, 36(4), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e31821826a1 · DOI
- Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D., & King, S. (2024). Dialect prejudice predicts AI decisions about people’s character, employability, and criminality. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2403.00742. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.00742 · DOI · Paper page
- Holstein, K., Yu, Z., Sewall, J., Popescu, O., McLaren, B. M., spsampsps Aleven, V. (2018). Opening up an intelligent tutoring system development environment for extensible student modeling. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: 19th International Conference, AIED 2018, London, UK, June 27–30, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 19 (pp. 169–183). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_13 · DOI
- Huber, S. E., Kiili, K., Nebel, S., Ryan, R. M., Sailer, M., & Ninaus, M. (2024). Leveraging the potential of large language models in education through playful and game-based learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09868-z · DOI · Paper page
- Hutt, S., & Hieb, G. (2024). Scaling up mastery learning with generative AI: Exploring how generative AI can assist in the generation and evaluation of mastery quiz questions. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 310–314). https://doi.org/10.1145/3657604.3664699 · DOI
- Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., spsampsps Specht, M. (2017). Awareness is not enough: Pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practice. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, spsampsps M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.), Data driven approaches in digital education (Vol. 10474, pp. 82–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_7 · DOI
- Kakar, S., Maiti, P., Taneja, K., Nandula, A., Nguyen, G., Zhao, A., ... spsampsps Goel, A. (2024). Jill Watson: scaling and deploying an AI conversational agent in online classrooms. In A. Sifaleras spsampsps F. Lin (Eds.). International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 78–90). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63028-6_7 · DOI
- Kali, Y., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Designing effective visualizations for elementary school science. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/590525 · DOI
- Knoop-van Campen, C. A. N., Wise, A., & Molenaar, I. (2023). The equalizing effect of teacher dashboards on feedback in K-12 classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3447–3463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1931346 · DOI · Paper page
- Kolodner, J. L., Gray, J., & Fasse, B. B. (2003b). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3(2), 183–232.
- Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. (2023). Gender bias and stereotypes in large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM collective intelligence conference (pp. 12–24). https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615599 · DOI · Paper page
- Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002179 · DOI · Paper page
- Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299087 · DOI
- Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Franke, U. (2024). Towards an integrated perspective of teachers’ technology integration: A preliminary model and future research directions. Frontline Learning Research, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v12i1.1179 · DOI
- Leiker, D., Gyllen, A. R., Eldesouky, I., spsampsps Cukurova, M. (2023). Generative AI for learning: investigating the potential of learning videos with synthetic virtual instructors. In International conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 523–529). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36336-8_81 · DOI · Paper page
- Levy, J., Jotkowitz, A., & Chowers, I. (2019). Deskilling in ophthalmology is the inevitable controllable? Eye, 33(3), 347–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0252-7 · DOI
- Lindner, A., Romeike, R., Jasute, E., & Pozdniakov, S. (2019). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence. In 12th International conference on informatics in schools,“Situation, evaluation and perspectives”, ISSEP.
- Liu, K., Tschinkel, R., & Miller, R. (2024). Digital equity and school leadership in a post-digital world. EECNU Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231224083 · DOI
- Mamede, S., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Reflection in medical diagnosis: A literature review. Health Professions Education, 3(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.01.003 · DOI
- Mascha, M. F., & Smedley, G. (2007). Can computerized decision aids do “damage”? A case for tailoring feedback and task complexity based on task experience. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2007.03.001 · DOI
- Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A. A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2020). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 13(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2916802 · DOI
- May, T. A., Fan, Y. K., Stone, G. E., Koskey, K. L., Sondergeld, C. J., Folger, T. D., ... & Johnson, C. C. (2025). An effectiveness study of generative artificial intelligence tools used to develop multiple-choice test items. Education Sciences, 15(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020144 · DOI
- Meyer, L., & Dannecker, A. (2024). Comparative analysis of generative AI models in educational exercise performance. In EDULEARN24 Proceedings (pp. 5181–5190). https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1273 · DOI
- Miller, C., & Bartlett, J. (2012). 'Digital fluency': Towards young people's critical use of the internet. Journal of Information Literacy, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.11645/6.2.1714 · DOI
- Nazar, A. M., Selim, M. Y., Gaffar, A., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Revolutionizing undergraduate learning: CourseGPT and Its Generative AI Advancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18310. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.18310 · DOI
- Netland, T., von Dzengelevski, O., Tesch, K., & Kwasnitschka, D. (2025). Comparing human-made and AI-generated teaching videos: An experimental study on learning effects. Computers & Education, 224, 105164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105164 · DOI
- Ninaus, M., & Sailer, M. (2022). Closing the loop–The human role in artificial intelligence for education. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 956798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956798 · DOI
- Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6 · DOI · Paper page
- Perković, G., Drobnjak, A., & Botički, I. (2024). Hallucinations in LLMs: Understanding and Addressing Challenges. In 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO) (pp. 2084–2088). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569238 · DOI
- NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine), 2018. How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783 · DOI
- Rafner, J., Dellermann, D., Hjorth, A., Verasztó, D., Kampf, C., Mackay, W., & Sherson, J. (2021). Deskilling, upskilling, and reskilling: A case for hybrid intelligence. Morals & Machines, 1(2), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.5771/2747-5174-2021-2 · DOI
- Rus, V., Olney, A. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2023). Deeper learning through interactions with students in natural language. Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 250–272. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375413.00021 · DOI
- Sailer, M., Maier, R., Berger, S., Kastorff, T., & Stegmann, K. (2024a). Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102446 · DOI
- Sailer, M., Ninaus, M., Huber, S. E., Bauer, E., & Greiff, S. (2024b). The end is the beginning is the end: The closed-loop learning analytics framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 108305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108305 · DOI
- Sailer, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., & Fischer, F. (2021). Contextual facilitators for learning activities involving technology in higher education: The C♭-model. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794 · DOI
- Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of Media, Cognition, and Learning. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052945 · DOI
- Schmucker, R., Xia, M., Azaria, A., Mitchell, T. (2024). Ruffle spsampspsRiley: Insights from designing and evaluating a large language model-based conversational tutoring System. In A. M. Olney, I. A. Chounta, Z. Liu, O. C. Santos, spsampsps I. I. Bittencourt (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64302-6_6 · DOI
- Sommerhoff, D., Codreanu, E., Nickl, M., Ufer, S., & Seidel, T. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ learning of diagnostic skills in a video-based simulation: Effects of conceptual vs. interconnecting prompts on judgment accuracy and the diagnostic process. Learning and Instruction, 83, 101689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101689 · DOI
- Spector, J. M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: From artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z · DOI
- Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314 · DOI · Paper page
- Sutton, S. G., Arnold, V., & Holt, M. (2018). How much automation is too much? Keeping the human relevant in knowledge work. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-52311 · DOI
- UNESCO (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education-a tool on whose terms?. UN. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501 · DOI
- Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9134-7 · DOI
- Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., ... & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). Teachers’ trust and perceptions of AI in education: The role of culture and AI self-efficacy in six countries. arXiv e-prints, arXiv-2312. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.01627 · DOI
- Vogt, K., & Flindt, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of language teacher education: A critical review of the use of AI tools in the foreign language classroom. The future of Teacher Education: Innovations across Pedagogies, Technologies and Societies, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004678545_008 · DOI
- Williams, R., Kaputsos, S. P., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Teacher perspectives on how to train your robot: A middle school AI and ethics curriculum. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 35, No. 17, pp. 15678–15686). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17847 · DOI
- Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., spsampsps McLaren, B. M. (2017). Effects of a dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson plans and class sessions. In E. Andr´e, R. Baker, X. Hu, M. M. T. Rodrigo, spsampsps B. Du Boulay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (Vol. 10331, pp. 582–585). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_69 · DOI
- Xu, T., Liu, Y., Jin, Y., Qu, Y., Bai, J., Zhang, W., & Zhou, Y. (2024). From recorded to AI‐generated instructional videos: A comparison of learning performance and experience. British Journal of Educational Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13530 · DOI
- Yeh, Y. F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238 · DOI
- Zapata-Rivera, D., spsampsps Arslan, B. (2024). Learner modeling interpretability and explainability in intelligent adaptive systems. In Mind, Body, and Digital Brains (pp. 95–109). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58363-6_7 · DOI
- Zhang, L., Lin, J., Kuang, Z., Xu, S., Yeasin, M., & Hu, X. (2024). SPL: A socratic playground for learning powered by large language mode. arXiv preprint . arXiv:2406.13919. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.13919 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yan, L., Pammer‐Schindler, V., Mills, C., Nguyen, A., & Gašević, D. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70000 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
The algorithmic self: how AI is reshaping human identity, introspection, and agency
Joseph, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645795 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Melanou, C., & Beege, M. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16040651 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Seung, Y., & Basham, J. D. (2026) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.1177/07319487261439132 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Encountering Generative AI: Narrative Self-Formation and Technologies of the Self Among Young Adults
Kvietkute, D., & Ness, I. J. (2026) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc16010026 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…carries both productive potential and significant risks: AI mental health tools can foster self-consciousness through structured prompts otherwise inaccessible to many users [24], yet excessive reliance may result in cognitive disengagement correlating with reduced critical thinking [25].”
Abdellatif, M. S., Alshehri, M. A., Lamouchi, A., Rahmath, M., & Nemt-allah, M. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1809174
“…(Sweller, 1988), this stratified deployment suggests students may be offloading these routine mechanical tasks to AI tools to preserve working memory resources for more complex reasoning—a pattern with both pedagogical promise and risk for authentic skill development (Bauer et al., 2025).”
How do students regulate their learning with a genAI chatbot?
Lim, L., & Bannert, M. (2026) · Learning Letters · doi:10.20851/ll.v8.61
- Authors
- Bauer, E., Greiff, S., Graesser, A. C., Scheiter, K., & Sailer, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- University of Memphis (US)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bauer, Elisabeth
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2025-04-24
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W4409772554
- Semantic Scholar
- 2da9852bdb03fc2307a09d00759eb208eb2c971c
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 126 · 2025: 27
- FWCI
- 158.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- US Army DEVCOM Soldier Center (W912CG-24-2-0001)
- Institute of Education Sciences of the US Department of Education (R305A200413, R305T240021)
- Universität Augsburg
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, AI-assisted learning, cognitive processes in learning, inversion effect, substitution effect, AI literacy, overreliance on AI, deep learning, teaching implementation, digital learning technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review