The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning methods in chemoinformatics
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning algorithms are generally developed in computer science or adjacent disciplines and find their way into chemical modeling by a process of diffusion. Though particular machine learning methods are popular in chemoinformatics and quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR), many others exist in the technical literature. This discussion is methods‐based and focused on some algorithms that chemoinformatics researchers frequently use. It makes no claim to be exhaustive. We concentrate on methods for supervised learning, predicting the unknown property values of a test set of instances, usually molecules, based on the known values for a training set. Particularly relevant approaches include Artificial Neural Networks, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, k‐Nearest Neighbors and naïve Bayes classifiers. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2014, 4:468–481. This article is categorized under: Computer and Information Science > Chemoinformatics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
What is principal component analysis?
Ringnér, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0308-303 · Cited by 2,407
p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure
Hansch, C., & Fujita, T. (1964) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01062a035 · Cited by 2,313
GALTON, F. (1907) · Nature · doi:10.1038/075450a0 · Cited by 1,080
On Outliers and Activity CliffsWhy QSAR Often Disappoints
Maggiora, G. M. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci060117s · Cited by 728
Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?
Sheridan, R. (2002) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(02)02411-x · Cited by 412
Cited by
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42717 · Cited by 18,367
MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning
Wu, Z., Ramsundar, B., Feinberg, E. N., Gomes, J., Geniesse, C., Pappu, A. S., Leswing, K., & Pande, V. (2018) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c7sc02664a · Cited by 3,107
Generating Focused Molecule Libraries for Drug Discovery with Recurrent Neural Networks
Segler, M. H. S., Kogej, T., Tyrchan, C., & Waller, M. P. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00512 · Cited by 1,537
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Deep Dive into Plastic Monomers, Additives, and Processing Aids
Wiesinger, H., Wang, Z., & Hellweg, S. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00976 · Cited by 724
Machine Learning in Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning
Coley, C. W., Green, W. H., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087 · Cited by 704
Prediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning
Zahrt, A. F., Henle, J. J., Rose, B. T., Wang, Y., Darrow, W. T., & Denmark, S. E. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau5631 · Cited by 683
Jiang, D., Wu, Z., Hsieh, C.-Y., Chen, G., Liao, B., Wang, Z., Shen, C., Cao, D., Wu, J., & Hou, T. (2021) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00479-8 · Cited by 664
Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development
Ekins, S., Puhl, A. C., Zorn, K. M., Lane, T. R., Russo, D. P., Klein, J. J., Hickey, A. J., & Clark, A. M. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0338-z · Cited by 578
Convolutional embedding of attributed molecular graphs for physical property prediction
Coley, C. W., Barzilay, R., Green, W. H., Jaakkola, T. S., & Jensen, K. F. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00601 · Cited by 470
Ain, Q. U., Aleksandrova, A., Roessler, F. D., & Ballester, P. J. (2015) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1225 · Cited by 357
Kadurin, A., Aliper, A., Kazennov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Khrabrov, K., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14073 · Cited by 350
Koutsoukas, A., Monaghan, K. J., Li, X., & Huan, J. (2017) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0226-y · Cited by 315
“SVMs along with RF is a widely applied machine-learning algorithm in the field of Cheminformatics [63, 64].”
Atom-density representations for machine learning
Willatt, M. J., Musil, F., & Ceriotti, M. (2019) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5090481 · Cited by 179
Marchese Robinson, R. L., Palczewska, A., Palczewski, J., & Kidley, N. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00753 · Cited by 167
Machine Learning in Pharmacometrics: Opportunities and Challenges
McComb, M., Bies, R., & Ramanathan, M. (2022) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14801 · Cited by 128
Comparative Study of Multitask Toxicity Modeling on a Broad Chemical Space
Sosnin, S., Karlov, D., Tetko, I. V., & Fedorov, M. V. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00685 · Cited by 102
“49 The idea is close to chemical paradigm that similar compounds have lookalike properties.”
BackgroundHaghighatlari, M., Vishwakarma, G., Altarawy, D., Subramanian, R., Kota, B. U., Sonpal, A., Setlur, S., & Hachmann, J. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1458 · Cited by 92
Computational methods for prediction of in vitro effects of new chemical structures
Banerjee, P., Siramshetty, V. B., Drwal, M. N., & Preissner, R. (2016) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0162-2 · Cited by 60
Dawson, D. E., Lau, C., Pradeep, P., Sayre, R. R., Judson, R. S., Tornero-Velez, R., & Wambaugh, J. F. (2023) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics11020098 · Cited by 56
Formatting biological big data for modern machine learning in drug discovery
Duran‐Frigola, M., Fernández‐Torras, A., Bertoni, M., & Aloy, P. (2019) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1408 · Cited by 25
Interpretable Deep-Learning Unveils Structure–Property Relationships in Polybenzenoid Hydrocarbons
Weiss, T., Wahab, A., Bronstein, A. M., & Gershoni-Poranne, R. (2023) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.joc.2c02381 · Cited by 24
Conrado, D. J., Duvvuri, S., Geerts, H., Burton, J., Biesdorf, C., Ahamadi, M., Macha, S., Hather, G., Francisco Morales, J., Podichetty, J., et al. (2020) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1782 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, J. B. O.
- Venue
- WIREs Computational Molecular Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 468-481
- ISSN
- 1759-0876 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-0884
- OpenAlex
- W2171830166
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 25.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
