The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracking stem cells using magnetic nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
Stem cell therapies offer great promise for many diseases, especially those without current effective treatments. It is believed that noninvasive imaging techniques, which offer the ability to track the status of cells after transplantation, will expedite progress in this field and help to achieve maximized therapeutic effect. Today's biomedical imaging technology allows for real‐time, noninvasive monitoring of grafted stem cells including their biodistribution, migration, survival, and differentiation, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of nanoparticle‐labeled cells being one of the most commonly used techniques. Among the advantages of MR cell tracking are its high spatial resolution, no exposure to ionizing radiation, and clinical applicability. In order to track cells by MRI, the cells need to be labeled with magnetic nanoparticles, for which many types exist. There are several cellular labeling techniques available, including simple incubation, use of transfection agents, magnetoelectroporation, and magnetosonoporation. In this overview article, we will review the use of different magnetic nanoparticles and discuss how these particles can be used to track the distribution of transplanted cells in different organ systems. Caveats and limitations inherent to the tracking of nanoparticle‐labeled stem cells are also discussed.WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2011 3 343–355 DOI: 10.1002/wnan.140 This article is categorized under:Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Cells at the Nanoscale Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
de Vries, I. J. M., Lesterhuis, W. J., Barentsz, J. O., Verdijk, P., van Krieken, J. H., Boerman, O. C., Oyen, W. J. G., Bonenkamp, J. J., Boezeman, J. B., Adema, G. J., et al. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1154 · Cited by 821
Self-citationIn vivo MRI cell tracking: clinical studies
Bulte, J. W. M. (2009) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3107 · Cited by 430
Self-citationIron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of the liver and spleen: review of the first 5 years
Ferrucci, J. T., & Stark, D. D. (1990) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.155.5.2120963 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles
Colombo, M., Carregal-Romero, S., Casula, M. F., Gutiérrez, L., Morales, M. P., Böhm, I. B., Heverhagen, J. T., Prosperi, D., & Parak, W. J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15337h · Cited by 1,315
In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles
Arami, H., Khandhar, A., Liggitt, D., & Krishnan, K. M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00541h · Cited by 830
Stem cell tracking using iron oxide nanoparticles
Seifalian, A., Bull, E., Madani, Sheth, Green, M., & Seifalian, A. (2014) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s48979 · Cited by 136
Duyn, J. (2013) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2012.11.013 · Cited by 95
Kratz, H., Taupitz, M., Ariza de Schellenberger, A., Kosch, O., Eberbeck, D., Wagner, S., Trahms, L., Hamm, B., & Schnorr, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190214 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Cromer Berman, S. M., Walczak, P., & Bulte, J. W. M.
- Venue
- WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-355
- ISSN
- 1939-0041 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5116
- OpenAlex
- W2033032660
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking stem cells using magnetic nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/wnan.140
- The paper
- Cromer Berman, S. M., Walczak, P., & Bulte, J. W. M. (2011). Tracking stem cells using magnetic nanoparticles. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.