Cited by 46Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGambling Behavior and TreatmentsMental Health and Psychiatry

Balancing validity, utility and public health considerations in disorders due to addictive behaviours

Open access
Stein, Dan J., Billieux, Joël, Bowden‐Jones, Henrietta, Grant, Jon E., Fineberg, Naomi, Higuchi, Susumu, Hao, Wei, Mann, Karl +8 more·2018·World Psychiatry

Abstract

The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this letter and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the World Health Organization.The letter

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20570

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recognition of gaming disorder in the ICD-11, as well as its inclusion in the DSM-5 research appendix, has accelerated basic and applied research endeavours.

    “The recognition of gaming disorder in the ICD-11, as well as its inclusion in the DSM-5 research appendix, has accelerated basic and applied research endeavours 211,212 .”

    From Emerging experience with selected new categories in the <scp>ICD</scp>‐11: complex <scp>PTSD</scp>, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [212]

    The paper’s main section says DSM-5 provides Internet gaming disorder criteria for further study and that the draft ICD-11 includes gaming disorder. It also describes a growing literature and increasing information on gaming disorder, but does not say that either classification accelerated basic or applied research. It discusses a draft ICD-11, not recognition in the finalized classification. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By classifying these disorders within an addiction framework, the ICD-11 endorses the approach that addictive behaviour is not exclusively a medical problem, and that prevention and reduction of the associated health and social burden may be achieved by interventions inside and outside the health sector.

    “By classifying these disorders within an addiction framework, the ICD-11 endorses the approach that addictive behaviour is not exclusively a medical problem, and that prevention and reduction of the associated health and social burden may be achieved by interventions inside and outside the health sector [1].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Chamberlain SR, Lochner C, Stein DJ et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2016;26:841-55.
  2. Saunders JB, Hao W, Long J et al. J Behav Addict 2017;6:271-9.
  3. Starcevic V. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2016;50:721-5.
  4. Aarseth E, Bean AM, Boonen H et al. J Behav Addict 2017;6:267-70.
  5. Hasin DS, O'Brien CP, Auriacombe M et al. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:834-51.
  6. Saunders JB. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2017;30:227-37.
  7. Grant JE, Atmaca M, Fineberg NA et al. World Psychiatry 2014;13:125-7. DOI:10.1002/wps.20570

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, D. J., Billieux, J., Bowden‐Jones, H., Grant, J. E., Fineberg, N., Higuchi, S., Hao, W., Mann, K., Matsunaga, H., Potenza, M. N., Rumpf, H. M., Veale, D., Ray, R., Saunders, J. B., Reed, G. M., & Poznyak, V.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • National Center for Addiction Services Administration Yokosuka Kanagawa Japan
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • Hyogo Medical University (JP)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Swami Rama Himalayan University (IN)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-07
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
363-364
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2890956318
Cited by
46
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
diagnostic validity, clinical utility, addiction psychiatry, diagnostic criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review