Cited by 101Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Learning to lose control: A process-based account of behavioral addiction

Open access
Perales, José C., King, Daniel L., Navas, Juan F., Schimmenti, Adriano, Sescousse, Guillaume, Starcevic, Vladan, van Holst, Ruth J., Billieux, Joël·2020·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Learning psycho(bio)logy has developed a solid corpus of evidence and theory regarding behavior control modes. The present article briefly reviews that literature and its influence on recent models in which the transition from goal-directed to compulsive behavior is identified as the main process underlying substance use disorders. This literature is also relevant to non-substance addictive disorders, and serves as basis to propose a restricted definition of behavioral addiction relying on the presence of behavior-specific compulsivity. Complementarily, we consider whether some activities can become disordered while remaining mostly goal-driven. Based on reinforcement learning models, relative outcome utility computation is proposed as an alternative mechanism through which dysfunctional behaviors (even not qualifying as addictive) can override adaptive ones, causing functional impairment. Beyond issues of conceptual delimitation, recommendations are made regarding the importance of identifying individual etiological pathways to dysregulated behavior, the necessity of accurately profiling at-risk individuals, and the potential hazards of symptom-based diagnosis. In our view, the validity of these recommendations does not depend on the position one takes in the nosological debate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.025

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goal-based control of behavior involves the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and is at the basis of conscious wanting.

    “In the context of addiction, the goal is based upon the hedonic representation of the reward in the brain (Perales et al., 2020).This involves the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Perales et al., 2020) and is at the basis of wanting, with no inverted commas.”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Perales et al., 2020

    The body passage labeled “17” (page unavailable) says that a subregion of the vmPFC/orbitofrontal cortex represents rewards’ subjective values, allowing a decision-maker to weigh which reward to pursue. This supports the involvement of that region in goal-based choice, but the passage does not establish that it is the basis of conscious wanting; the paper discusses ‘wanting’ separately in connection with incentive sensitization. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some parts of the control of behavior become more automatic with repeated experience.

    “Some parts of the control of behavior become more automatic with repeated experience.Such a shift, based upon increasing incentive salience, represents a criterion for the definition of addiction (Perales et al., 2020).”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Perales et al., 2020

    The paper’s discussion of habit-driven behavior (page not available in our copy) says that behavior can become stimulus-triggered after extensive training, supporting the quoted point about increasing automaticity with experience. Its discussion of addiction distinguishes habit formation from incentive sensitization, however; it does not make increasing incentive salience itself a criterion for defining addiction. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only problematic sexuality might constitute 'addicted', the former simply being described as having a passion.

    “Only the latter might constitute 'addicted', the former simply being described as having a passion (Perales et al., 2020).”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Perales et al., 2020

    In the paper’s discussion of functional impairment (page not available), high engagement without impairment is distinguished from problematic behavior, and the term “passion” is offered for non-pathological engagement. This supports the proposed distinction in general, but the passage does not make it specifically about sexuality; the paper also reserves “addiction” for problematic patterns with evidence of compulsivity. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The word 'compulsion' captures a feature of the mental life of sexually-addicted people, i.e. a feeling compelled to act, often against their better judgement.

    “The word 'compulsion' captures a feature of the mental life of sexually-addicted people, i.e. a feeling compelled to act, often against their better judgement (Perales et al., 2020).”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Perales et al., 2020

    In section 7 (page not supplied), the paper describes compulsivity as an experience of being ‘forced’ or ‘compelled’ to act despite expected negative consequences. It supports the meaning of compulsion in the claim, but the passage discusses addiction generally rather than establishing this experience specifically in sexually addicted people. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The literature describes two types of impulsivity: domain-general, which is evident regardless of the task, and domain-specific, where the level of impulsivity depends upon the context.

    “The literature describes two types of impulsivity: domain-general, which is evident regardless of the task, and domain-specific, where the level of impulsivity depends upon the context (Perales et al., 2020;Mahoney and Lawyer, 2018).”

    From A motivation model of sex addiction – Relevance to the controversy over the concept (2022) · cites this paper as Perales et al., 2020

    In the section labelled 17 (page not supplied), the paper says that weak executive control can produce various forms of impulsivity in a domain-general manner. It discusses domain-specific compulsivity, but the passages do not describe domain-specific impulsivity whose level varies by task or context, or present these as two types of impulsivity. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perales, J. C., King, D. L., Navas, J. F., Schimmenti, A., Sescousse, G., Starcevic, V., van Holst, R. J., & Billieux, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
Corresponding author
Navas, Juan F.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
108
Pages
771-780
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995007569
Cited by
101
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Spanish Government (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación; Convocatoria 2017 de Proyectos I+D de Excelencia, Spain
  • Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER, European Union
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
behavioral addiction, goal-directed behavior, compulsive behavior, behavioral control, substance use disorders, reinforcement learning models, functional disability, symptom-based diagnosis
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Reinforcement, Psychology, Behavior, Addictive, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review