Cited by 612Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment

Open access
McCutcheon, Robert  A., Krystal, John H., Howes, Oliver D.·2020·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Glutamate and dopamine systems play distinct roles in terms of neuronal signalling, yet both have been proposed to contribute significantly to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In this paper we assess research that has implicated both systems in the aetiology of this disorder. We examine evidence from post‐mortem, preclinical, pharmacological and in vivo neuroimaging studies. Pharmacological and preclinical studies implicate both systems, and in vivo imaging of the dopamine system has consistently identified elevated striatal dopamine synthesis and release capacity in schizophrenia. Imaging of the glutamate system and other aspects of research on the dopamine system have produced less consistent findings, potentially due to methodological limitations and the heterogeneity of the disorder. Converging evidence indicates that genetic and environmental risk factors for schizophrenia underlie disruption of glutamatergic and dopaminergic function. However, while genetic influences may directly underlie glutamatergic dysfunction, few genetic risk variants directly implicate the dopamine system, indicating that aberrant dopamine signalling is likely to be predominantly due to other factors. We discuss the neural circuits through which the two systems interact, and how their disruption may cause psychotic symptoms. We also discuss mechanisms through which existing treatments operate, and how recent research has highlighted opportunities for the development of novel pharmacological therapies. Finally, we consider outstanding questions for the field, including what remains unknown regarding the nature of glutamate and dopamine function in schizophrenia, and what needs to be achieved to make progress in developing new treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20693

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different biological pathways have been implicated in the aetio-pathogenesis across multiple mental disorders, including serotonin, dopamine, GABA/glutamatergic, inflammation, oxidative stress, synaptic plasticity/neurogenesis, and the HPA axis.

    “Different biological pathways have been implicated in the aetio-pathogenesis across multiple mental disorders. Some of these are pathways related to neurotransmission such as serotonin (Provenzi, Giorda, Beri, & Montirosso, 2016), dopamine or GABA/glutamatergic processes (McCutcheon, Krystal, & Howes, 2020); while others pathways involve inflammation (Cullen et al., 2019), oxidative stress (Steul”

    From Can epigenetics shine a light on the biological pathways underlying major mental disorders? (2022) · cites this paper as McCutcheon, Krystal, & Howes, 2020

  • Alterations in glutamatergic and GABAergic pathways, which can lead to either excitatory/inhibitory imbalance, have been reported to play a role in the etiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders and ASD.

    “Alterations in glutamatergic and GABAergic pathways, which can lead to either excitatory/inhibitory imbalance, have been reported to play a role in the etiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders (McCutcheon et al., 2020) and ASD (Marotta et al., 2020).”
  • It is widely accepted that dopaminergic dysregulation stands as one of the most supported hypotheses for the pathogenesis of SCZ and psychosis as a whole.

    “It is widely accepted that dopaminergic dysregulation stands as one of the most supported hypotheses for the pathogenesis of SCZ and psychosis as a whole (Jauhar et al., 2018; McCutcheon et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCutcheon, R. A., Krystal, J. H., & Howes, O. D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-10
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
15-33
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2999889141
Cited by
612
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 2
FWCI
52.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (200102/Z/15/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L022176/1, MR/N026063/1, MR/N027078/1)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, dopamine, glutamate, glutamatergic dysfunction, dopaminergic dysfunction, striatal dopamine synthesis, dopamine release, genetic risk factors, environmental risk factors, neural circuits, psychotic symptoms, antipsychotic mechanism of action, neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review