Cited by 796Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Intact-brain analyses reveal distinct information carried by SNc dopamine subcircuits

Open access
Lerner, Talia N., Shilyansky, Carrie, Davidson, Thomas J., Evans, Kathryn E., Beier, Kevin T., Zalocusky, Kelly A., Crow, Ailey K., Malenka, Robert C. +3 more·2015·Cell

Abstract

Recent progress in understanding the diversity of midbrain dopamine neurons has highlighted the importance--and the challenges--of defining mammalian neuronal cell types. Although neurons may be best categorized using inclusive criteria spanning biophysical properties, wiring of inputs, wiring of outputs, and activity during behavior, linking all of these measurements to cell types within the intact brains of living mammals has been difficult. Here, using an array of intact-brain circuit interrogation tools, including CLARITY, COLM, optogenetics, viral tracing, and fiber photometry, we explore the diversity of dopamine neurons within the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). We identify two parallel nigrostriatal dopamine neuron subpopulations differing in biophysical properties, input wiring, output wiring to dorsomedial striatum (DMS) versus dorsolateral striatum (DLS), and natural activity patterns during free behavior. Our results reveal independently operating nigrostriatal information streams, with implications for understanding the logic of dopaminergic feedback circuits and the diversity of mammalian neuronal cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.014

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The input-output architecture of the DR serotonin system differs from the locus coeruleus norepinephrine system with more homogeneous input and output, and resembles midbrain dopamine systems with biased input and segregated output.

    “Thus, the input-output architecture of the DR serotonin system differs from that of the locus coeruleus norepinephrine system with more homogeneous input and output (Schwarz et al., 2015), and resembles more closely those of the midbrain dopamine systems (Beier et al., 2015; Lerner et al., 2015), with biased input and segregated output.”

    From Anatomically defined and functionally distinct dorsal raphe serotonin sub-systems (2018) · cites this paper as Lerner et al., 2015

  • A strong activation in response to the physical impact of an aversive stimulus in particularly sensitive neurons may supersede a depression reflecting the negative value, and this might appear as a categorical difference in aversive and motivational salience coding.

    “Thus, a strong activation in response to the physical impact of an aversive stimulus in particularly sensitive neurons may supersede a depression reflecting the negative value, and this might appear as a categorical difference in aversive and motivational salience coding15,23,24,134.”
  • Dopamine neurons in the lateral midbrain display greater burst activity in vivo and higher excitability in vitro than those in the medial midbrain, such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA).

    “Dopamine neurons in the lateral midbrain display greater burst activity in vivo28 and higher excitability in vitro29,30 than those in the medial midbrain, such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA), where canonical reward-processing dopamine neurons reside.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lerner, T. N., Shilyansky, C., Davidson, T. J., Evans, K. E., Beier, K. T., Zalocusky, K. A., Crow, A. K., Malenka, R. C., Luo, L., Tomer, R., & Deisseroth, K.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Deisseroth, Karl
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
635-647
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1875506666
Cited by
794
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 13
FWCI
28.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • H. L. Snyder Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5f31mh105151-02, 1f32mh105053-01)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1F31MH105151-01, F32 MH105053, 1F32MH105053-01, P50MH086403, F31 MH105151)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F32DA038913, R37DA035377)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
substantia nigra pars compacta, dopaminergic neurons, neuronal cell types, nigrostriatal pathway, dorsomedial striatum, dorsolateral striatum, striatal output, neuronal heterogeneity, clarity, optogenetics, viral tracing, fiber photometry
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Reward, Shock, Substantia Nigra, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review