Cited by 124Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities

Open access
Biggs, Matthew B., Medlock, Gregory L., Kolling, Glynis L., Papin, Jason A.·2015·WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Genome‐scale metabolic network reconstructions and constraint‐based analyses are powerful methods that have the potential to make functional predictions about microbial communities. Genome‐scale metabolic networks are used to characterize the metabolic functions of microbial communities via several techniques including species compartmentalization, separating species‐level and community‐level objectives, dynamic analysis, the ‘enzyme‐soup’ approach, multiscale modeling, and others. There are many challenges in the field, including a need for tools that accurately assign high‐level omics signals to individual community members, the need for improved automated network reconstruction methods, and novel algorithms for integrating omics data and engineering communities. As technologies and modeling frameworks improve, we expect that there will be corresponding advances in the fields of ecology, health science, and microbial community engineering. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2015, 7:317–334. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1308 This article is categorized under: Analytical and Computational Methods > Computational Methods Biological Mechanisms > Metabolism

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wsbm.1308

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [33]Mahadevan R Edwards JS Doyle FJ Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli Biophysical journal. Elsevier 2002 83 3 1331 40 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73903-9 PMC1302231 12202358 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [81]Alneberg J Bjarnason BS de Bruijn I Schirmer M Quick J Ijaz UZ Loman NJ Andersson AF Quince C CONCOCT: Clustering cONtigs on COverage and ComposiTion Arxiv preprint arXiv:13124038v1 2013 28
  3. [93]Bartell Ja Yen P Varga JJ Goldberg JB Papin Ja Comparative metabolic systems analysis of pathogenic Burkholderia Journal of bacteriology 2014 196 2 210 26 10.1128/JB.00997-13 24163337 PMC3911241 · DOI
  4. Röling WFM Ferrer M Golyshin PN Systems approaches to microbial communities and their functioning Current opinion in biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd 2010 21 4 532 8 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.06.007 20637597 · DOI
  5. Klitgord N Segrè D Ecosystems biology of microbial metabolism Current opinion in biotechnology 2011 22 4 541 6 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.018 21592777 · DOI
  6. Karlsson FH Nookaew I Petranovic D Nielsen J Prospects for systems biology and modeling of the gut microbiome Trends in biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd 2011 29 6 251 8 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.009 21392838 · DOI
  7. Borenstein E Computational systems biology and in silico modeling of the human microbiome Briefings in bioinformatics 2012 13 6 769 80 10.1093/bib/bbs022 22589385 · DOI
  8. Thiele I Heinken A Fleming RMT A systems biology approach to studying the role of microbes in human health Current opinion in biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd 2013 24 1 4 12 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.10.001 23102866 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biggs, M. B., Medlock, G. L., Kolling, G. L., & Papin, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Papin, Jason A.
Venue
WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-24
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
317-334
ISSN
  • 1939-005X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5094
OpenAlex
W1903478710
Cited by
124
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM008715, GM108501)
  • Jefferson Trust Big Data Fellowship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
genome-scale metabolic reconstruction, constraint-based analysis, microbial communities, multiscale modeling, multi-omics integration
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Biological, Systems Biology, Metabolomics, Microbial Consortia, Metabolic Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review