Cited by 95Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Evaluation of behavioral factors influencing reproductive success and failure in captive giant pandas

Zhang, Guiquan, Swaisgood, Ronald R., Zhang, Hemin·2004·Zoo Biology

Abstract

The giant panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca ) breeding center in Wolong, China, has experienced a recent dramatic increase in reproduction, with the population nearly tripling in the past 7 years. Much of this success comes from the development of behavioral management strategies, guided by the application of scientific knowledge. Here we present statistics that illuminate where reproductive problems have occurred, and discuss remedial actions taken with individual animals. During each year of this study (1996–2000), 93% of the females experienced estrus, 72% copulated, and 51% gave birth. Two‐thirds of the males mated each year. Most instances of mating failure were attributed to male behavior. In nearly half of mating failures, the male mounted but did not copulate. In about one‐third of mating failures, the male lacked sexual motivation, and showed excessive aggression 20% of the time. The males varied, and some were more likely to show interest in estrous females in neighboring enclosures and/or mate successfully during introductions. Copulation time was unrelated to reproductive success, but more insemination events (matings and artificial inseminations (AIs) combined) may be related to twinning. We suspect that temperament, stress, and husbandry practices play a role in isolated cases of reproductive failure in females, both pre‐ and postcopulation. Pregnancy or conception failure occurred in 35% of females inseminated naturally or through artificial insemination (AI). Beh…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.10118

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, G., Swaisgood, R. R., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
Zoological Society of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Swaisgood, Ronald R.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
15-31
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W1974058066
Cited by
95
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
giant panda, captive breeding, reproductive success, mating failure, male behavior, estrus, artificial insemination, miscarriage, twin births, behavior management, enrichment, olfactory communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review