Monitoring stress in captive giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca): behavioral and hormonal responses to ambient noise
Abstract
Anthropogenic noise may impact captive breeding programs for endangered species. We recorded ambient noise and monitored potential behavioral and hormonal indices of stress in two captive giant pandas for 4 years. Statistical analyses were conducted for each individual separately, which allowed us to generalize only to these two animals. These preliminary findings indicate that ambient noise can have long‐lasting effects on stress indices. Days characterized by louder levels of noise were associated with increased locomotion, restless manipulation of the exit door of the enclosure, increased scratching and vocalizations indicative of agitation, and/or increased glucocorticoids excreted in urine. These general effects were modulated by several factors: 1) Brief loud noise evoked behavioral distress, but not pituitary‐adrenal activation. More chronic, moderate‐amplitude noise was associated with higher levels of glucocorticoids. 2) Some responses were frequency‐dependent, with loud low‐frequency noise having the greatest impact. 3) Female reproductive condition interacted significantly with noise amplitude for all behavioral measures, with stronger effects for the loudest acute noises. The female appeared especially sensitive to noise during estrus and lactation, and less so during pregnancy/pseudopregnancy and nonreproductive periods. Despite these statistical effects, we found no compelling evidence that these adjustments indicate substantive detrimental effects on well‐being…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Owen found that pandas had lower cortisol levels and fewer signs of behavioural agitation when given the choice of where to spend their time.
“Owen [140] found that pandas had lower cortisol levels and fewer signs of behavioural agitation when given the choice of where to spend their time.”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [140]
Enclosures that provide captive animals with a level of choice and control over interactions with visitors, for example by providing an area to retreat, can help minimise visitor-induced stress.
“Like animals in other captive settings, research has shown that enclosures that provide zoos animals with a level of choice and control over the interactions with visitors, for example by providing an area to retreat, can help minimise visitor-induced stress (Owen et al. 2004;Ross 2006;Morgan and Tromborg 2007).”
From Effects of the presence of zoo visitors on zoo‐housed little penguins ( <i>Eudyptula minor</i> ) (2022) · cites this paper as Owen et al. 2004
Cites
Stress hormones: their interaction and regulation
Axelrod, J., & Reisine, T. D. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6143403 · Cited by 1,527 · see citing works
Wielebnowski, N. C., Fletchall, N., Carlstead, K., Busso, J. M., & Brown, J. L. (2002) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.10005 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Windle, R. J., Wood, S. A., Shanks, N., Lightman, S. L., & Ingram, C. D. (1998) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.139.2.443 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Zhang, G., Swaisgood, R. R., & Zhang, H. (2004) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.10118 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
New directions for zoo animal welfare science
Whitham, J. C., & Wielebnowski, N. (2013) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“Similarly, Owen [140] found that pandas had lower cortisol levels and fewer signs of behavioural agitation when given the choice of where to spend their time.”
BackgroundZoo visitor effect on mammal behaviour: does noise matter?
Quadros, S., Goulart, V. D. L., Passos, L., Vecci, M. A. M., & Young, R. J. (2014) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2014.04.002 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Queiroz, M. B., & Young, R. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8080139 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Effects of the presence of zoo visitors on zoo‐housed little penguins ( <i>Eudyptula minor</i> )
Chiew, S. J., Butler, K. L., Fanson, K. V., Eyre, S., Coleman, G. J., Sherwen, S. L., Melfi, V., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2022) · New Zealand Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1080/03014223.2021.1896560 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Owen, M. A., Swaisgood, R. R., Czekala, N. M., Steinman, K., & Lindburg, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Zoological Society of San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Owen, Megan A.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-164
- ISSN
- 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2361
- OpenAlex
- W2087748554
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- giant panda, captive animal welfare, anthropogenic noise, stress monitoring, glucocorticoids, urine cortisol, low-frequency noise, estrus, lactation, reproductive status, captive breeding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review