Brief threatening events beneficial for captive tamarins?
Abstract
To evaluate speculation indirectly suggesting that brief arousal may be beneficial to animals, 39 cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) living in 4 large families were observed (a) after normal husbandry procedures that excite them (capture and brief removal of infants or older monkeys), (b) after exposure to an over‐flying bird model, and (c) compared with control days in which neither of the above occurred. Both arousal conditions caused a decrease in play and locomotion, and an increase in grooming and contact during the remainder of the day. These behavioral changes are similar to the patterns reported as positive effects of enrichment but are dissimilar to negative effects of long‐term stressors reported. The pattern of changes in studies of enrichment and of stress enables more objective evaluation of ambiguous events.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible that brief threatening events are beneficial to captive primates.
“It is also possible that brief threatening events are beneficial to captive primates (Moodie & Chamove 1990).”
From Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? (2000) · cites this paper as Moodie & Chamove 1990
Cites
Dawkins, M. S. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5905-7 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of stress in captivity
Morgan, K. N., & Tromborg, C. T. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
How does the zoo environment affect the behaviour of captive primates?
Hosey, G. R. (2005) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.015 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Wielebnowski, N. C., Fletchall, N., Carlstead, K., Busso, J. M., & Brown, J. L. (2002) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.10005 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect?
Hosey, G. R. (2000) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600022946 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Effects of environmental enrichment on reproduction
Carlstead, K., & Shepherdson, D. (1994) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.1430130507 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Moreira, N., Brown, J. L., Moraes, W., Swanson, W. F., & Monteiro‐Filho, E. L. A. (2007) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.20139 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moodie, E. M., & Chamove, A. S.
- Venue
- Zoo Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 275-286
- ISSN
- 0733-3188
- 1098-2361
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
