Cited by 84Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal and Plant Science EducationMuseums and Cultural Heritage

Visitor reaction to pacing behavior: influence on the perception of animal care and interest in supporting zoological institutions

Miller, Lance J.·2012·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Many publications within the field of zoo animal welfare have stated the importance of decreasing stereotypic behavior (e.g., pacing) to help ensure a positive visitor experience. The idea behind these statements is that visitors want to see animals engaged in natural behavior. Additionally, it is thought that watching an animal exhibit species-appropriate behavior could help increase a visitor's connection to wildlife and ultimately their interest in conservation. However, until recently, no information was available to validate such statements. The purpose of this research was to examine people's reaction to viewing an animal engaged in pacing behavior. Participants were randomly selected to fill out a survey after watching a short video of either a tiger pacing or resting (control). Results indicate that having viewed a tiger pacing significantly decreases people's perception of the level of care animals receive at that facility. In addition, people's interest in supporting zoos decreased as a result of viewing this behavior. Results are discussed from an animal welfare, business, and conservation perspective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.20411

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stereotypies in zoo animals are the most studied behavioural indicator of poor welfare.

    “Stereotypies in zoo animals are the most studied behavioural indicator of poor welfare, perhaps because they tend to receive a lot of attention particularly in zoos as they can be relatively well recognized by the public [42].”
  • Research has shown that visitors care about animal welfare.

    “Research has shown visitors care about animal welfare [42], and any signs of suffering or welfare compromise in zoo-housed animals can counter-balance a zoo’s contribution to conservation.”
  • Signs of suffering or welfare compromise in zoo-housed animals can counter-balance a zoo's contribution to conservation.

    “Research has shown visitors care about animal welfare [42], and any signs of suffering or welfare compromise in zoo-housed animals can counter-balance a zoo’s contribution to conservation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, L. J.
Affiliations
Zoological Society of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Lance J.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-19
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
242-248
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W1502390323
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
pacing behavior, stereotypy, zoo animal welfare, tourist perceptions, tiger, zoo visitor experience, conservation interest, captive animals
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Zoo, Behavior, Animal, Financial Support, Humans, Public Opinion, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stereotyped Behavior, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review