Cited by 49Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Zoo animal welfare assessment: where do we stand?

Open access
Tallo-Parra, Oriol, Salas, Marina, Manteca, Xavier·2023·Animals

Abstract

Zoological institutions, such as zoos and aquariums, have made animal welfare a top priority, as it is not only a moral obligation but also crucial for fulfilling their roles in education and conservation. There is a need for science-based tools to assess and monitor animal welfare in these settings. However, assessing the welfare of zoo animals is challenging due to the diversity of species and lack of knowledge on their specific needs. This review aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing methodologies for assessing zoo animal welfare through: (1) A critical analysis of the main approaches to zoo animal welfare assessment; (2) A description of the most relevant animal-based welfare indicators for zoo animals with a particular focus on behavioural and physiological indicators; and (3) An identification of areas that require further research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani13121966

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Species-specific welfare assessment tools offer a refined and more precise evaluation of animal welfare by tailoring assessments to the unique needs, behaviors, and physiological aspects of a particular species.

    “These offer a refined and more precise evaluation of animal welfare by tailoring assessments to the unique needs, behaviors, and physiological aspects of a particular species (24).”

    From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 3.1 says species-specific protocols are tailored to each species’ biological needs and can use indicators tested for validity and reliability. But it describes these advantages as theoretical and notes that few protocols and validated indicators exist, so it does not establish that the tools generally provide a more precise evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This review is the first overview of welfare assessment tools specific to elephants.

    “While there have been several reviews of animal welfare frameworks (24–26), to our knowledge, this is the first overview of welfare assessment tools specific to elephants.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [13]Tallo-Parra O. Delfour F. von Fersen L. Garcia-Párraga D. Manteca X. Moneal-Pawlowsky T. Pilenga C. Ternes K. Clegg I.L.K. Garcia Hartmann M. Dolphin-WET (Welfare Evaluation Tool): A New Conceptual Framework for Welfare Evaluation of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) under Human Care Proceedings of the EAZA Annual Conference Valencia, Spain 17–21 September 2019
  2. [22]Watters J.V. Krebs B.L. Pacheco E. Measuring Welfare through Behavioral Observation and Adjusting It with Dynamic Environments Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2019 212 240
  3. [32]Hosey G. Melfi V. Behaviour P.S. Zoo Animals: Behaviour, Management and Welfare Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 2009 82 128
  4. [73]Paul-Murphy J. Molter C. Overview of Animal Welfare in Zoos Fowler’s Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine Current Therapy, Volume 9 Elsevier St. Louis, MO, USA 2019 64 72
  5. [94]Staley M. Miller L.J. Salivary Bioscience and Research on Animal Welfare and Conservation Science Salivary Bioscience Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2020 675 708
  6. [110]Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in Its Cultural Context Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. Oxford, UK 2008 978-1-405-13695-2
  7. [113]Schreck C.B. Tort L. Farrell A.P. Brauner C.J. Biology of Stress in Fish Academic Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2016 9780128027288
  8. [124]Swanberg S.E. Telomeres and Telomerase in Birds Conn’s Handbook of Models for Human Aging Elsevier Cambridge, MA, USA 2018 313 322 9780128113530

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tallo-Parra, O., Salas, M., & Manteca, X.
Affiliations
  • School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
  • Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp (BE)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Manteca, Xavier
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-12
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
1966
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380485712
Cited by
45
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Flemish Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, animal welfare assessment, welfare indicators, behavioural indicators, physiological parameters, zoos and aquariums, captive animals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review