CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Wildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hunting by male lions: ecological influences and socioecological implications

FUNSTON, P.J, MILLS, M.G.L, BIGGS, H.C, RICHARDSON, P.R.K·1998·Animal Behaviour
DOI 10.1006/anbe.1998.0884
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the Kruger National Park, male lions, Panthera leo, acquire most of their food by hunting rather than scavenging. This study, the most intensive to date of male lion ecology, showed that in savanna woodlands, with high buffalo, Syncerus caffer, densities, male lions were frequent and successful hunters. The main prey species of all male group types, but particularly nonterritorial males, was buffalo. By contrast, females preyed more frequently on the most abundant medium-sized ungulates, such as wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus, and zebra, Equus burchelli. Thus intraspecific prey selection separation was based primarily on intersexual and, to a lesser extent, social differences. Furthermore, both nonterritorial males and pride females located their favoured prey, buffalo and medium-sized ungulates, respectively, more often than other prey. We investigated the influence of several ecological variables on the socioecology of male lions, particularly as we had determined that territorial males spent little time with their pride females and tended to hunt by themselves in their respective male coalitions. Further analysis showed that in a range of ecosystems in southern and eastern Africa the proportion of time territorial males spent with, and thus scavenged from, their pride females was strongly influenced by vegetation structure, and therefore probably by the assemblage of available ungulates. In open systems, territorial males were, therefore, likely to be encountered with pride females, whereas in more wooded areas they were likely to be encountered away from their pride females. We suggest that this is because vegetation structure influences food/prey availability and hunting success and influences territory maintenance and/or cub defence. (c) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/anbe.1998.0884

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gasaway, 1989, Demography of spotted hyaenas in an arid savanna, Etosha National Park, Namibia, Madoqua, 16, 121
  2. Mills, 1985, Hyaena survey of Kruger National Park: August–October 1984, I.U.C.N.S.S.C. Hyaena Specialist Group Newsletter, 2, 15
  3. Stander, 1993, Hunting success of lions ina semi-arid environment, Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 127

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
FUNSTON, P. J., MILLS, M. G. L., BIGGS, H. C., & RICHARDSON, P. R. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • South African National Parks (ZA)
ORCID
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
1333-1345
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1006/anbe.1998.0884
OpenAlex
W2022828912
Cited by
133
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
lion, hunting behavior, prey selection, socioecology, territoriality, buffalo, wildebeest, zebra, vegetation structure, savanna woodland, hunting success, Kruger National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review