Cited by 151Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Seasonal Diet and Prey Preference of the African Lion in a Waterhole-Driven Semi-Arid Savanna

Open access
Davidson, Zeke, Valeix, Marion, Van Kesteren, Freya, Loveridge, Andrew J., Hunt, Jane E., Murindagomo, Felix, Macdonald, David W.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Large carnivores inhabiting ecosystems with heterogeneously distributed environmental resources with strong seasonal variations frequently employ opportunistic foraging strategies, often typified by seasonal switches in diet. In semi-arid ecosystems, herbivore distribution is generally more homogeneous in the wet season, when surface water is abundant, than in the dry season when only permanent sources remain. Here, we investigate the seasonal contribution of the different herbivore species, prey preference and distribution of kills (i.e. feeding locations) of African lions in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe, a semi-arid African savanna structured by artificial waterholes. We used data from 245 kills and 74 faecal samples. Buffalo consistently emerged as the most frequently utilised prey in all seasons by both male (56%) and female (33%) lions, contributing the most to lion dietary biomass. Jacobs' index also revealed that buffalo was the most intensively selected species throughout the year. For female lions, kudu and to a lesser extent the group "medium Bovidae" are the most important secondary prey. This study revealed seasonal patterns in secondary prey consumption by female lions partly based on prey ecology with browsers, such as giraffe and kudu, mainly consumed in the early dry season, and grazers, such as zebra and suids, contributing more to female diet in the late dry season. Further, it revealed the opportunistic hunting behaviour of lions for prey as diverse as elephants and mice, with elephants taken mostly as juveniles at the end of the dry season during droughts. Jacobs' index finally revealed a very strong preference for kills within 2 km from a waterhole for all prey species, except small antelopes, in all seasons. This suggested that surface-water resources form passive traps and contribute to the structuring of lion foraging behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0055182

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buffalo are a preferred prey species in several savanna ecosystems.

    “Whereas buffalo are a preferred prey species in several savanna ecosystems [21,57,58], they constituted less than 5% of kills found during our study, and less than 1% of male kills (Table 5), despite male lions specifically targeting buffalo elsewhere [52].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [28]Van Kesteren F (2006) Analysis of the diet of African Lions (Panthera leo) in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. Masters thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  2. [41]Campbell K, Borner M (1995) Population trends and distribution of Serengeti herbivores: Implications for management. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P, editors. Serengeti II. Dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 117–145.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, Z., Valeix, M., Van Kesteren, F., Loveridge, A. J., Hunt, J. E., Murindagomo, F., & Macdonald, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Zeke
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-02-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
e55182
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982006692
Cited by
151
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Panthera
  • Eppley Foundation for Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
African lion, leopard, seasonal diet, prey selection, waterholes, semi-arid savanna, opportunistic feeding, buffalo, Kudus, giraffe, zebra, Suidae, elephants, drought, Hwange National Park
MeSH terms
Animals, Diet, Environment, Female, Lions, Male, Predatory Behavior, Seasons, Zimbabwe, Ecosystem, Biomass, Herbivory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review