Cited by 119Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal testing and alternatives

Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: effects of cage stocking density and behavioural predictors of welfare

Hurst, J.L., Barnard, C.J., Tolladay, U., Nevision, C.M., West, C.D.·1999·Animal Behaviour

Abstract

Using male and female Alderley Park (Wistar-derived) rats housed in single-sex groups in standard laboratory cages, we looked at the effect of group size (one, three, five or eight) on competitive behaviour and time budgeting (initial and longer term), changes in their serum testosterone (males), corticosterone and antibody concentrations, and organ pathology at age 16 weeks, together with the interrelationships between behavioural measures and pathophysiological indices of social stress. Group size had only limited long-term effects on overall time budgeting and did not affect pathophysiological responses, although there were highly significant differences between individuals in replicate cage groups. Pathophysiology within both sexes showed strong and highly specific correlations with a small subset of behaviours suggesting frustrated attempts to escape from cages, including chewing the cage bars. Escape-related behaviour also correlated strongly with one component of competitive behaviour, Aggressive Grooming within both sexes, although Aggressive Grooming correlated with pathophysiological responses only among males. Females generally showed greater escape-related behaviour associated with greater signs of pathophysiology regardless of the level of aggression shown between cagemates. Major differences in intercorrelated behavioural and pathophysiological responses between replicate groups implied that the individual composition of groups rather than their size had the greater impact on the welfare of the rats, especially among females. This may be consistent with adaptive sex differences in their competitive reproductive strategies. The frequency of apparent escape-related behaviours and Aggressive Grooming, particularly when rats are first introduced into their cage groups, may provide a simple assessment of the welfare implications of particular cage groupings. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/anbe.1999.1165

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adult rats show more escape-related behavior after 1-4 days of isolation.

    “adult rats show an increase in escape-related behaviors over 1–4 days of isolation54”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurst, J. L., Barnard, C. J., Tolladay, U., Nevision, C. M., & West, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory (GB)
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
563-586
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974046370
Cited by
119
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
group size, competitive behavior, time allocation, social stress, serum testosterone, corticosterone, antibody concentration, organ pathology, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review