Cited by 159Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Group mating among Norway rats II. The social dynamics of copulation: Competition, cooperation, and mate choice

McClintock, Martha K., Anisko, Joseph J., Adler, Norman T.·1982·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-3472(82)80052-3

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClintock, M. K., Anisko, J. J., & Adler, N. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
McClintock, Martha K.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-05
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
410-425
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987305528
Cited by
159
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Rattus norvegicus, copulation, sperm precedence, sperm transport, sperm competition, female competition, mate choice, dominance hierarchy, social dynamics, implantation, estrous females

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review