The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Practical significance: a concept whose time has come
Kirk, R. E. (1996) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002 · Cited by 1,778 · cited 1×
“This has prompted some to argue that tests of statistical significance are not generally useful (Carver, 1978, 1993; Cohen, 1994; Hunter, 1997; Kirk, 1996; Schmidt, 1992).”
BackgroundMeta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs
Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.170 · Cited by 1,693 · cited 1×
“It is important to note that although the repeated measures are correlated, the standardizer can be obtained by treating the cell variances as independent estimates of the population variances ( Dunlap, Cortina, Vaslow, & Burke, 1996 ).”
BackgroundA common language effect size statistic
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361 · Cited by 934 · cited 1×
“…size measures (Dwyer, 1974; Glass & Hakstian, 1969; Maxwell, Camp, & Arvey, 1981; Richardson, 1996), suggesting alternative indices (Friedman, 1968; McGraw & Wong, 1992; Rosenthal & Rubin , 1982), and offering cautionary notes on the interpretation of these indices (Mitchell & Hartmann, 1981;…”
BackgroundWhat do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.
Schmidt, F. L. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.10.1173 · Cited by 564 · cited 1×
“This has prompted some to argue that tests of statistical significance are not generally useful (Carver, 1978, 1993; Cohen, 1994; Hunter, 1997; Kirk, 1996; Schmidt, 1992).”
BackgroundRichardson, J. T. E. (1996) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03203631 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Lakens, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 · Cited by 10,303
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
Poropat, A. E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014996 · Cited by 2,729
Ellis, P. D. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761676 · Cited by 2,461
Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106291059 · Cited by 2,133
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.8.4.434 · Cited by 1,622
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Olejnik, S., & Algina, J.
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-286
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072857138
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/ceps.2000.1040
- The paper
- Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
