Cited by 1,622Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Generalized Eta and Omega Squared Statistics: Measures of Effect Size for Some Common Research Designs.

Olejnik, Stephen, Algina, James·2003·Psychological Methods

Abstract

The editorial policies of several prominent educational and psychological journals require that researchers report some measure of effect size along with tests for statistical significance. In analysis of variance contexts, this requirement might be met by using eta squared or omega squared statistics. Current procedures for computing these measures of effect often do not consider the effect that design features of the study have on the size of these statistics. Because research-design features can have a large effect on the estimated proportion of explained variance, the use of partial eta or omega squared can be misleading. The present article provides formulas for computing generalized eta and omega squared statistics, which provide estimates of effect size that are comparable across a variety of research designs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.8.4.434

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
2003
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
434-447
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2133084664
Cited by
1,622
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 43
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
effect size, partial eta squared, analysis of variance, explained variance, research design
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Humans, Psychology, Educational, Psychology, Experimental, Psychometrics, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review