CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Categorization, perception, and languageMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Science and Education Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Basing Categorization on Individuals and Events

Barsalou, Lawrence W., Huttenlocher, Janellen, Lamberts, Koen·1998·Cognitive Psychology
DOI 10.1006/cogp.1998.0687
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Exemplar, prototype, and connectionist models typically assume that events constitute the basic unit of learning and representation in categorization. In these models, each learning events updates a statistical representation of a category independently of other learning events. An implication is that events involving the same individual affect learning independently and are not integrated into a single structure that represents the individual in an internal model of the world. A series of experiments demonstrates that human subjects track individuals across events, establish representations of them, and use these representations in categorization. These findings are consistent with "representationalism," the view that an internal model of the world constitutes a physical level of representation in the brain, and that the brain does not simply capture the statistical properties of events in an undifferentiated dynamical system. Although categorization is an inherently statistical process that produces generalization, pattern completion, frequency effects, and adaptive learning, it is also an inherently representational process that establishes an internal model of the world. As a result, representational structures evolve in memory to track the histories of individuals, accumulate information about them, and simulate them in events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/cogp.1998.0687

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 126 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Florian, J. 1992, Frequency effects on categorization and recognition, Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society,

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Barsalou, L. W., Huttenlocher, J., & Lamberts, K.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
ORCID
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-08
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
203-272
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1006/cogp.1998.0687
OpenAlex
W2155670932
Cited by
131
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
categorization, individual tracking, event-based learning, representationalism, prototype theory, exemplar theory, connectionist models, statistical learning, memory representation, generalization
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review