Cited by 141Bone Metabolism and DiseasesCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchBone and Dental Protein Studies

Impaired Bone Formation in Transgenic Mice Resulting from Altered Integrin Function in Osteoblasts

Open access
Zimmerman, Deborah, Jin, Fang, Leboy, Phoebe, Hardy, Stephen, Damsky, Caroline·2000·Developmental Biology

Abstract

To determine the role of integrins in mature osteoblasts in vivo, we expressed in transgenic mice a dominant-negative integrin subunit (beta1-DN) consisting of the beta1 subunit cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains, driven by the osteoblast-specific osteocalcin promoter. Immature osteoblasts isolated from transgenic animals differentiated normally in vitro until the osteocalcin promoter became active; thereafter they detached from the substratum, suggesting that beta1-DN was impairing adhesion in mature osteoblasts. Transgenic animals had reduced bone mass, with increased cortical porosity in long bones and thinner flat bones in the skull. At 35 days, the rate of bone formation was reduced in cortical bone, and the parietal bones were 45% thinner than in wild-type animals. Active osteoblasts were less polar and had larger areas of cytoplasm with intracellular stores of matrix molecules. Osteocyte lacunae appeared normal around the cell body but did not have normal canilicular structures. At 90 days, the parietal bone of transgenic males was of normal width, suggesting that the original defect in matrix deposition had been repaired or compensated for. In contrast, transgenic females still had decreased bone mass in the parietal bone at 90 days. The decreased bone mass in TG females was accompanied by increased staining for osteoclast activity, suggesting that there was a sex-specific defect in mature animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/dbio.2000.9633

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmerman, D., Jin, F., Leboy, P., Hardy, S., & Damsky, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
220
Issue
1
Pages
2-15
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034014800
Cited by
141
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthritis Foundation
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone and Dental Protein Studies
Keywords
beta1 integrin, osteoblasts, bone formation, osteocalcin promoter, transgenic mice, cell adhesion, bone mass, cortical porosity, osteocyte lacunae, sex differences, osteoclast activity, extracellular matrix deposition
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Development, Bone Resorption, Cell Adhesion, Extracellular Matrix, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Biological, Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Osteocalcin, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Integrin beta1, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review