Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a Sociological Theory of Discretion

Open access
CAMPBELL, ELAINE·1999·International Journal of the Sociology of Law
DOI 10.1006/ijsl.1999.0082
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ijsl.1999.0082

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cain, 1979, Trends in the sociology of police work, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7, 143
  2. Hewitt, 1975, ‘Disclaimers’, American Sociological Review, 61, 420
  3. Manning, 1993, Toward a theory of police organization: polarities and change, International Conference on Social Change in Policing
  4. Scott, 1968, Accounts, American Sociological Review, 22, 664

Cited by

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
CAMPBELL, E.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
CAMPBELL, ELAINE
ORCID
CAMPBELL, ELAINE
Venue
International Journal of the Sociology of Law
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
79-101
ISSN
0194-6595 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1006/ijsl.1999.0082
OpenAlex
W2022552148
Cited by
70
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 19 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International journal of law, crime and justice (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
discretion, police discretion, employee autonomy, police theory, policing, police behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.