Cited by 147Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbusePsychiatric care and mental health services

Secondary prevention of attempted suicide in adolescence

Cotgrove, Adnrew, Zirinsky, Linda, Black, Dora, Weston, Diane·1995·Journal of Adolescence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jado.1995.1039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One trial was rated as unclear risk of bias for personnel blinding because no information was reported, but the intervention was a one-off emergency card that could have been given privately (Cotgrove 1995).

    “We rated one trial, however, as having an unclear risk of bias for this item as, although no information on personnel blinding was reported, the intervention consisted of a one-off emergency card which could have been given to participants in private (Cotgrove 1995).”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Cotgrove 1995

  • In one trial, repetition of self-harm data came from clinical or hospital notes supplemented by general practitioners, social workers, and psychologists (Cotgrove 1995).

    “In one trial, information on repetition of SH was obtained from clinical or hospital notes supplemented by information from general practitioners, social workers, and psychologists (where relevant) (Cotgrove 1995).”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Cotgrove 1995

  • That emergency-card study appeared insufficiently powered to test repetition of self-harm properly.

    “However, the study appeared to be underpowered to properly test this outcome.”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Cotgrove 1995

  • In the single emergency-card study, repetition of self-harm did not differ between intervention and control groups.

    “In a single study to assess the effects of provision of an emergency card allowing patients to re-admit themselves to hospital (Cotgrove 1995), there was no difference in repetition of SH between the intervention and control groups.”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Cotgrove 1995

  • Few adolescents used the emergency card, and none who used it repeated self-harm.

    “Few adolescents made use of the emergency card, but none of those who did repeated SH.”

    From Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as Cotgrove 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cotgrove, A., Zirinsky, L., Black, D., & Weston, D.
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
569-577
ISSN
0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968952094
Cited by
143
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
suicide attempts, secondary prevention, adolescents, repeated suicide attempts, hospital readmission, token economy, risk assessment, suicide prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review