Cited by 219Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Youth

Glenn, Catherine R., Esposito, Erika C., Porter, Andrew C., Robinson, Devin J.·2019·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

The current review provides an evidence base update of psychosocial treatments for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) in youth. A systematic search was conducted of 2 major scientific databases (PsycInfo and PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to June 2018. The search identified 26 RCTs examining interventions for SITBs in youth: 17 were included in the 2015 review and 9 trials were new to this update. The biggest change since the prior review was the evaluation of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) as the first Level 1: Well-established intervention for reducing deliberate self-harm (composite of nonsuicidal and suicidal self-injury) and suicide ideation in youth and Level 2: Probably efficacious for reducing nonsuicidal self-injury and suicide attempts. Five other interventions were rated as Level 2: Probably efficacious for reducing SITBs in youth, with the new addition of Integrated Family Therapy. This evidence base update indicates that there are a few promising treatments for reducing SITBs in youth. Efficacious interventions typically include a significant family or parent training component as well as skills training (e.g., emotion regulation skills). Aside from DBT-A, few treatments have been examined in more than one RCT. Given that replication by independent research groups is needed to evaluate an intervention as Well-established, future research should focus on replicating the five promising interventions currently evaluated as Probably efficacious. In addition, an important future direction is to develop brief efficacious interventions that may be scalable to reach large numbers of youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2019.1591281

Cites

107 of 108 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBT was the only intervention to meet the threshold for 'well established treatments' for reducing suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour in children and adolescents.

    “An evidence update concluded that DBT was the only intervention to meet the threshold for ' well established treatments ' for reducing suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviour in children and adolescents 273 .”

    From Suicide and suicide risk (2019) · cites this paper as [273]

    The DBT-A section rates DBT as Level 1: Well-established for reducing suicidal ideation (SI) and deliberate self-harm (DSH) in youth. The paper defines DSH as including acts with or without intent to die, and rates DBT only Level 2: Probably efficacious for reducing suicide attempts. Thus, the claim overstates the well-established rating for suicidal behaviour. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across several different treatment interventions, certain elements seemed to increase treatment efficacy, such as a family-centred approach, the inclusion of skills-training, and (except for suicide attempts) longer treatment duration.

    “Across several different treatment interventions, certain elements seemed to increase treatment efficacy, such as a family-centred approach, the inclusion of skills-training, and (except for suicide attempts) longer treatment duration.”

    From Does treatment method matter? A meta-analysis of the past 20 years of research on therapeutic interventions for self-harm and suicidal ideation in adolescents (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The “Efficacious treatment components across interventions” section identifies family involvement and adolescent skills training as shared features of efficacious treatments. Its “Treatment dose” subsection says very brief interventions generally did not reduce self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, and that efficacious interventions for suicide attempts were intensive for 3–12 months. The claim’s exception for suicide attempts is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • DBT-A met the standard to be classified as a 'well-established intervention' for reducing both self-harm and suicidal ideation and was classified as 'probably efficacious' for reducing NSSI and suicide attempts.

    “In light of this additional evidence, DBT-A now met the standard to be classified as a ‘well-established intervention’ for reducing both self-harm and suicidal ideation and was classified as ‘probably efficacious’ for reducing NSSI and suicide attempts.”
  • DBT-A is an evidence-based treatment for adolescents with emotion dysregulation, especially concerning the reduction of self-harm.

    “According to international standards, Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT®-A) is an evidence-based treatment for these patients, especially concerning the reduction of self-harm (8–11).”
  • A range of psychosocial interventions, including cognitive-behavioural therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy and mentalization based therapy, have all been shown to reduce suicidal and self-harming behaviour in randomized trials with both adolescents and adults.

    “We must emphasize that a range of psychosocial interventions, including cognitive-behavioural therapy, dialectical behaviour therapy and mentalization based therapy have all been shown to reduce suicidal and self-harming behaviour in randomized trials with both adolescents [21] and adults [22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chambless DL, Baker MJ, Baucom DH, Beutler LE, Calhoun KS, Crits-Christoph P, … Woody SR (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. Clinical Psychologist, 51(1), 3– 16.
  2. Henggeler SW, Schoenwald SK, Borduin CM, Rowland MD, & Cunningham PB (2009). Multisystemic therapy for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents (2nd edition). New York, NY: Guilford.
  3. Rathus JH, & Miller AL (2014). Dialectical behavior therapy skills manual for adolescents. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glenn, C. R., Esposito, E. C., Porter, A. C., & Robinson, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Glenn, Catherine R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
357-392
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W4230498762
Cited by
219
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 6
FWCI
27.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (L30 MH101616)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, self-harm, non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal self-injury, suicidal ideation, youth, psychosocial interventions, dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents, parent training, emotion regulation skills, brief intervention, treatment efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review