Cited by 190Reading and Literacy DevelopmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing Normal Reading Skills: Aspects of the Visual Processes Underlying Word Recognition

Aghababian, Valérie, Nazir, Tatjana A.·2000·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Visual word recognition performance of first graders (mean age: 6.6 years) through fifth graders (mean age: 10.8 years) was investigated using an experimental technique that is known to elicit the "viewing position effect" in skilled readers. The results showed that this effect, which consists of a systematic variation of performance as a function of fixation position within words, emerged early at the end of the 1st year of reading instruction. Visual field asymmetries in recognizing individual letters in words were also observed starting from first grade. Effects of word familiarity were obtained as early as in second grade. In contrast to skilled readers, children showed a marked word-length effect, which persisted through the first 5 years of instruction. No other qualitative differences between beginning and skilled readers were apparent. Hence, the basics of reading skills, as measured by the present technique, seem to be attained very early during acquisition. Further experience mainly reduces the time a reader needs to extract visual information from print.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jecp.1999.2540

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aghababian, V. 1998, Acquisition de la lecture: Aspects développementaux et neuropsychologiques. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, Marseille, France.
  2. Grimes, M. 1989, Where first grade children look in words during reading. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
  3. Rayner, 1984, Visual selection in reading, picture perception, and visual search: A tutorial review, 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–190 of 190

Metadata

Authors
Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
123-150
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154415882
Cited by
190
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
visual word recognition, reading acquisition, fixation position, visual field asymmetry, word familiarity, word length effect, beginning readers, skilled readers, reading instruction
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review