When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Howard and Kahana showed that people tend to recall items semantically related to the item they just recalled.
“Howard and Kahana (2002) showed that participants tend to recall items which are semantically related to the item just recalled.”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Howard & Kahana, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014420 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Self-citationHoward, M. W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A. V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.75 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationThe benefit of generating errors during learning
Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033194 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Ward, G., Tan, L., & Grenfell-Essam, R. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0020122 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Task context and organization in free recall
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.013 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationDo different tests of episodic memory produce consistent results in human adults?
Cheke, L. G., & Clayton, N. S. (2013) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.030502.113 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Spontaneous thought as an unconstrained memory process
Mildner, J. N., & Tamir, D. I. (2019) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.09.001 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Brandeis University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-98
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081186730
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- free recall, semantic similarity, episodic memory retrieval, episodic memory, latent semantic analysis, temporal proximity, semantic proximity, recall order, memory organization, word lists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review