PreprintCited by 95Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Do different tests of episodic memory produce consistent results in human adults?

Open access
Cheke, Lucy G., Clayton, Nicola S.·2013·Learning & Memory

Abstract

A number of different philosophical, theoretical, and empirical perspectives on episodic memory have led to the development of very different tests with which to assess it. Although these tests putatively assess the same psychological capacity, they have rarely been directly compared. Here, a sample of undergraduates was tested on three different putative tests of episodic memory (What-Where-When, Unexpected Question/Source Memory, and Free Recall). It was predicted that to the extent to which these different tests are assessing the same psychological process, performance across the various tests should be positively correlated. It was found that not all tests were related and those relationships that did exist were not always linear. Instead, two tests showed a quadratic relationship, suggesting the contribution of multiple psychological processes. It is concluded that not all putative tests of episodic cognition are necessarily testing the same thing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.030502.113

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human performance across different episodic-like memory paradigms is not necessarily related, suggesting that distinct psychological processes may be employed for each.

    “Furthermore, human performance across different paradigms is not necessarily related [109], suggesting that distinct psychological processes may be employed for each [107,109,110].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [109]

  • Human episodic memory encompasses a variety of cognitive structures and processes amalgamating into an episodic memory system, and each episodic-like memory paradigm targets a different aspect of this system.

    “human episodic memory encompasses a variety of cognitive structures and processes amalgamating into an episodic memory system, and importantly each episodic-like memory paradigm targets a different aspect of this system [85,109].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheke, L. G., & Clayton, N. S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2013-08-16
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
491-498
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2041591910
Cited by
95
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Girton College, University of Cambridge
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
episodic memory, test-retest reliability, free recall, source memory, quadratic relationship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review