Cited by 92Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Task context and organization in free recall

Open access
Polyn, Sean M., Norman, Kenneth A., Kahana, Michael J.·2009·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Prior work on organization in free recall has focused on the ways in which semantic and temporal information determine the order in which material is retrieved from memory. Tulving's theory of ecphory suggests that these organizational effects arise from the interaction of a retrieval cue with the contents of memory. Using the continual-distraction free-recall paradigm [Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173-189] to minimize retrieval during the study period, we show that encoding task context can organize recall, suggesting that task-related information is part of the retrieval cue. We interpret these results in terms of the Context Maintenance and Retrieval model (CMR; [Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116 (1), 129-156]), in which an internal contextual representation, containing semantic, temporal, and source-related information, serves as the retrieval cue and organizes the retrieval of information from memory. We discuss these results in terms of the guided activation theory [Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202] of the role of prefrontal cortex in task performance, as well as the rich neuropsychological literature implicating prefrontal cortex in memory search (e.g., Schacter (1987). Memory, amnesia, and frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychobiology, 15, 21-36).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.013

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abrupt changes in stimulus features and/or task goals produce separation in memory.

    “In particular, inducing abrupt changes in stimulus features and/or task goals creates separation in memory [19,23–25].”

    From Does mental context drift or shift? (2017) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Polyn, Sean M.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
2158-2163
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137146301
Cited by
92
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Princeton University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH078513, R01MH055687, R01MH069456)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
free recall, memory organization, task context, encoding context, prefrontal cortex, memory search, semantic organization, temporal organization, source memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Time Factors, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review